AUDITORSTo
The Members of Ambuja Cements Limited
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Ambuja Cements Limited(the Company) as at December 31, 2009 and also the Profit and Loss Account andthe cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financialstatements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted inIndia. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonableassurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Anaudit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosuresin the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principlesused and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overallfinancial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basisfor our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) issuedby the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of theCompanies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified inparagraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:
i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of ourknowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;
ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by theCompany so far as appears from our examination of those books;
iii. The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with bythis report are in agreement with the books of account;
iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statementdealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section(3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
v. On the basis of the written representations received from the directors and taken onrecord by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified ason December 31, 2009 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) ofsub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanationsgiven to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956,in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accountingprinciples generally accepted in India;
a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as atDecember 31, 2009;
b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the year ended on thatdate; and
c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on thatdate.
For S. R. BATLIBOI & ASSOCIATES
Chartered Accountants
per Sudhir Soni
Partner
Membership No.: 41870
Mumbai, February 4, 2010
ANNEXURE
Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date
Re: Ambuja Cements Limited ('the Company')
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, includingquantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
(b) The Company has a programme for physical verification on a rotational basis, which,in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature ofits business. Accordingly, certain fixed assets have been physically verified by themanagement during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on suchverification. (c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.
(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonableintervals during the year.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management arereasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of itsbusiness.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no materialdiscrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
(iii) (a) As informed, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured tocompanies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 ofthe Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, sub-clause (b), (c) and (d) are not applicable.
(e) As informed, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured fromcompanies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 ofthe Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, sub-clause (f) and (g) are not applicable.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us,there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company andthe nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for thesale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no major weakness has beennoticed in the internal control system in respect of these areas. During the course of ouraudit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weakness in internalcontrol system of the company.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the management, weare of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to insection 301 of the Act that need to be entered into the register maintained under section301 have been so entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, thetransactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements exceeding value of Rupeesfive lakhs have been entered into during the financial year at prices which are reasonablehaving regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with thesize and nature of its business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuantto the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records undersection 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956, and are of the opinion that prima facie, theprescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained.
(ix) (a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate authoritiesundisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protectionfund, employees state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax,customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, undisputed dues inrespect of provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees stateinsurance, income-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty, cessand other statutory dues which were outstanding, at the year end for a period of more thansix months from the date they became payable are as follows:
| Nature of the Statute | Nature of Dues | Amount (Rs. in Crores) | Period to which the Amount relates | Due Date | Date of Payment |
| Chhattisgarh Vidyut Shulk Adhiniyam, 1949 | Electricity Duty | 0.75 | February to May 2009 | Last day of the relevant next month | January 13, 2010 |
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of income-tax,sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess on account of anydispute, are as follows:
| Name of the statute | Nature of dues | Amount** (Rs. in crores) | Period to which the amount relates | Forum where dispute is pending |
| Central Excise Act, 1944 | Demand of Excise Duty on clearance of Cement & Others | 0.13 | 1999-2005 | CESTAT* |
| | 1.09 | 2005-2007 | CESTAT |
| | 0.37 | 2006-2007 | Commissioner (A) |
| Denial of MODVAT credit on Inputs and Capital Goods | 3.18 | 1993-2007 | CESTAT* |
| | 7.75 | 1993-2007 | CESTAT |
| | 0.98 | 1994-2004 | Commissioner (A)* |
| | 0.11 | 1994-2007 | Commissioner (A) |
| | 0.75 | 1993-2004 | High Court * |
| | 2.02 | 1996-2002 | Supreme Court* |
| Denial of Service Tax Credit | 2.59 | 2005-2007 | CESTAT |
| | 0.24 | 2005-2006 | Commissioner (A) |
| Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Various State Sales Tax Act | Demand of Sales Tax / | 4.92 | 1991-2009 | High Court |
| Additional Tax / | 3.30 | 1999-2003 | High Court * |
| Purchase Tax | 2.30 | 1999-2008 | Supreme Court * |
| | 1.13 | 1988-2008 | Tribunal |
| | 17.70 | 1991-2008 | Commissioner |
| Custom Act, 1962 | Demand of Customs Duty | 0.93 | 1996-2007 | CESTAT |
| | 0.52 | 1996-2007 | CESTAT * |
| | 0.08 | 2007-2008 | Commissioner (A)* |
| | 0.44 | 2000-2008 | Commissioner (A) |
| Rajasthan Land Tax Rules, 2006 | Demand of Land Tax | 21.41 | 2006-2009 | High Court |
| Rajasthan Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1958 | Environment Cess | 2.53 | 2008-2009 | High Court |
| Chhattisgarh Upkar (Sanshodhan Adhiniyam) 2004 | Mineral Area Development Cess | 4.33 | 2006-2009 | High Court |
| Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 | Stamp Duty | 1.45 | 2006-2009 | High Court |
* In respect of these cases the Department is in appeal
** Net of amount deposited
(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it hasnot incurred cash losses in the current and immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and explanations given bythe management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment ofdues to a financial institution, bank or debenture holders.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on thedocuments and records produced to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances onthe basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (AuditorsReport) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities,debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of theCompanies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not applicable to theCompany.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has notgiven any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions.
(xvi) The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the year.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overallexamination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised onshort-term basis have been used for long-term investment.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties orcompanies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company hascreated security or charge in respect of debentures issued.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during the year.Accordingly, the provisions of clause (xx) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the trueand fair view of the financial statements and as per the information and explanationsgiven by the management, we report that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed orreported during the course of our audit.
For S. R. BATLIBOI & ASSOCIATES
Chartered Accountants
per Sudhir Soni
Partner
Membership No.: 41870
Mumbai, February 4, 2010