| |
|
| 'This site is a must read for investors ..' Forbes magazine | |
| India Infoline Sector Reports | Wed, 18-Feb-2004 16:16:31 IST (GMT+5:30) | |
| Refining | ||
|
Deregulation Need For Deregulation As stated in the chapter on APM, the oilindustry is totally controlled and the policies relating to the industry are fullyregulated by the Government of India. Right from the source of crude procurement, controlsexist till the final distribution of finished products, prices, pattern of production,sales plan of oil companies, product availability, expansion of the industry, andconsequently earnings of the players in the sector. To be fair to policy makers, thecurrent controls did succeed to achieve macro-economic goals of the Government for morethan two decades. With the ushering of liberalization since early 90's, the situation hashowever undergone a sea change and the policy makers have begun to feel that the APM mayno longer work successfully as it had in the past and the energy security of the countrywould be under threat if a robust industry is not created. The factors that have causedthis change can be summarized as under.
As per the forecasts published by TERI,petroleum consumption is estimated to increase from 97mtpa to 104mtpa in 2001 and grow at6% and above. The foreign exchange required to meet this demand is massive and thus theforeign exchange reserves could significantly influence the availability of energy andthus economic growth. In this backdrop, the country has been increasingly feeling the needfor energy security, which can be achieved only by curbing excessive dependence on oilimports. The Government is aware that this can be achieved only by massive investments inthe upstream and the downstream sector and it is estimated that an amount of US$100bnwould be required in the next 15 years. Such magnitude of investments can be attractedonly if the industry is free of controls. The concept of APM has also outlived itsutility as it has created large oligopolies with no guarantee that the assets are beingput to the most optimal use. The cost-plus formula may also not be workable with newprivate sector entrants into the industry, over whom the Government can exercise littlecontrol. Capital generation in the upstream sector has seriously been affected with theartificially low price of crude paid to the two NOCs consequently the E&P activity hasnot picked up to the desired extent thus resulting in crude oil production stagnating. Theprice distortions of various products has resulted in inefficient energy use and theluxury of bad energy management cannot be prolonged any further. The Government is aware that the need of theday is to build a robust and an internationally competitive industry, which can provideenergy security to the country. This can be achieved only by freeing the industry from allcontrols and by creation of a climate conducive for productive investment in the sector. Process Of De-regulation The process of partial withdrawal ofregulation in the sector commenced with the decanalisation of several petroleum products,permission to new entrants to market LPG and SKO, decontrol of lubricants, awardingproduction-sharing contracts of oil wells and rationalization of tariff structure. In Nov'94, MOP & NG set up a committee under the Chairmanship of Shri U. Sundararajan, CMDof BPCL to provide a framework for the development of Market Determined Price Mechanism(MDPM). The Government also setup a Strategic Planning Group on re-structuring of the oilindustry (R-Group) in January 1995 to develop a financially sound and internationallycompetitive hydrocarbon sector. The R-Group comprises officials from the GOI, economists,eminent personalities from the industry and is headed by Shri Vijay L. Kelkar, SecretaryMOP & NG. The Sundararajan Committee presented its report "HydrocarbonPerspective: 2010 - Meeting the Challenges" in Feb '95 to the R-Group and the Grouphas acknowledged this report to be an important input in preparation of blueprint forrestructuring of the sector. The R-Group has come out with its first set ofrecommendations on exploration & production, natural gas and tariff & pricingreforms in September 1996. The second & final report on issues related to energysecurity, empowerment of public sector and downstream marketing is yet to be released bythe R-Group. In its bid to carry forward the recommendations of the R-Group, the Govt. hasalready announced a new exploration licensing policy (NELP) in Mar '97 incorporating mostof its recommendations. Sundarajan Committee Report Recommendations of Sundararajan committee The consumption of petroleum products islikely to increase to 149 mmt by the year 2010. The indigenous production is howeverdeclining and by the year 2010, only about 27% of the total demand will be met out ofindigenous production giving rise to large imports resulting in serious repercussions onbalance of payments and energy security Suitable policy measures would therefore be
To achieve this, the sector should becompletely opened up by
The regulatory body shall be established undera statute and shall perform the following functions
The hydrocarbon sector should be totallyde-regulated at one go
|
|
| 5PAISA | PREMIUM CONTENT | ADVERTISE WITH US | FEEDBACK | DISCLAIMER | PRIVACY POLICY | JOBS | FAQS | SITE MAP | HELP |