(This report is a revision of our earlier report dated 29.04.2026 based on observations of The Comptroller and Auditor General of India)
To The Members of MOIL Limited
Report on the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements
Opinion
We have audited the Standalone Financial Statements of MOIL LIMITED (the Company), which comprises the Balance Sheet as at 31st March 2026, and the statement of the Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the statement of Changes in Equity and the statement of Cash Flow for the year then ended, and notes to the Financial Statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information (herein after referred to as Standalone Financial Statements).
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid Financial Statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Act read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended, (Ind AS) and other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2026, the profit and total comprehensive income, the changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit of standalone Financial Statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under section 143 (10) of the Companies Act, 2013. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the Auditors Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the Financial Statements under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the ICAIs Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on the financial statements.
Emphasis of Matter
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to the following matters:
1. Point No. 1.2.15 of accounting policy & Note No. 2.27 for recognition of revenue. The revenue includes Royalty, District Mineral Fund (DMF) and National Minerals Exploration Trust contribution (NMET) collected on behalf of third party on actual basis as per contract. This has been done by the Company as per industry practice and based on expert opinion obtained.
2. Note No. 2.5 (Investment) & Note 3.12 with regard to classification of expenditure of capital nature for exploration (MOIL Share) for proposed Joint Venture with GMDC, amounting to H 765.28 Lakhs. This is disclosed under Investments in the name and style of MOIL-GMDC JV, yet to be incorporated. This amount should have been classified under Other Non- Current Assets.
3. Note No. 2.4 (Intangible asset under development)
& Note No. 3.13 with regard to classification of expenditure of capital nature for exploration for a proposed Joint Venture with MPSMCL. This expenditure amounting to RS.1694.75 Lakhs is being recognized and accounted for as Intangible asset under development in the financial statements. This MoU has been signed to explore the options of manganese ore mining in different districts of the state of Madhya Pradesh. This amount should have been classified under Other Non- Current Assets.
4. Note No 2.4 (Intangible asset under development)
& Note No. 3.14 with regard to classification of expenditure of capital nature for exploration for proposed Joint Venture with Chhattisgarh Mineral Development Corporation (CMDC). This expenditure amounting to RS.115.76 Lakhs is being recognized and accounted for as Intangible assets under development in the financial statements. This MoU has been signed to explore the options of mining for manganese and associated minerals in different districts of the state of Chhattisgarh. This amount should have been classified under Other Non- Current Assets.
5. Note No. 3.15 (i) (b) and 3.16 regarding Land in Bobbili. The land at Bobbili was purchased by MOIL from
APIIC for the setting up of Ferro / Silico Manganese plant. A Joint Venture Company was formed with RINL. Techno economic feasibility report (TEFR) was prepared by MECON in 2000. It was determined that the project was not viable in view of the power tariff increase and the reduction in market prices of the Ferro / Silico Manganese. The land at Bobbili, which is valued at H898.92 lakhs and WDV of Building H8.03 lakhs has been considered as contingent liability by the Company. This amount should not be treated as a contingent liability as there is no expected financial outlay against the same. The land is fully paid for, and the Company does not have any further liabilities against the same.
6. Point No. 1.2.3 of accounting policy & Note No. 2.90 for Inventory. A significant portion of Low-Grade inventory (LGHS) of the opening stock, remains unsold during the year. The determination of NRV for such inventories involves management judgement, particularly in respect of future saleability, pricing and utilisation of such stock. Accordingly, we find that the valuation of such inventory is dependent upon the outcomes of these assessments.
7. We draw attention to Note No. 2.23 to the standalone financial statements regarding the process adopted by the Company for identification of vendors covered under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 ("MSMED Act").
Udyam Registration details of vendors have not been integrated into the SAP vendor master and identification of MSME vendors is being carried out through manual processes based on information and documents obtained from vendors. Consequently, the identification and monitoring of MSME vendors are not fully integrated with the Companys ERP system and continue to be supported through manual controls and procedures established by the management.
8. We draw attention to Note No. 3.10 to the standalone financial statements regarding Related Party Transactions.
The Companys Related Party Transaction Policy, originally approved by the Board and reviewed periodically in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, was revised during the year and approved by the Board in its 368th Meeting held on 19th March 2026 to incorporate provisions relating to proposed subsidiary/joint venture arrangements. Further, the financial statements do not contain a separate accounting policy specifically addressing Related Party Transactions under Ind AS 24. The identification, approval and disclosure of related party transactions continue to be governed by the revised policy and applicable regulatory framework.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of the above matters.
Other Matter:
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to the following matters:
1. A penalty was imposed by the Collector, Balaghat amounting to H 1,677.09 lakhs, along with an additional demand of H54.54 lakhs towards economic benefits, in respect of environmental clearance (EC) capacity expansion violations at Tirodi Mine as per order dated 30/01/2025. The Company has disclosed the entire demand of H 1,731.63 lakhs as a contingent liability. Pursuant to an interim order of the Supreme Court of India, the matter was stayed, which was subsequently recalled on 18th November 2025. In our view, upon recall of the stay, the obligation towards the penalty stands reinstated. Considering that the Company has suo-moto accepted the violation and assessed the minimum payable amount at H 465.06 lakhs, a provision of H 519.60 lakhs (including H 54.54 lakhs towards economic benefits) is required to be recognised in accordance with the applicable Accounting Standards, with the balance amount of H 1,212.03 lakhs to be disclosed as a contingent liability.
A complaint has been filed against the Company for exceeding Environmental Clearance limits at Tirodi Mines during 200609. The potential penalty is not quantifiable, and no provision or disclosure has been made in the financial statements.
2. The Company has not carried out an assessment of any potential financial and operational impact arising from the implementation of the new Labour Codes effective from 21st November 2025. Consequently, no provision or liability has been recognised in the financial statements in respect of any obligations that may arise upon their applicability. Further, no disclosures have been made in the financial statements regarding the possible impact, status of implementation, or the expected implications of the new Labour Codes on the Companys operations, employee benefits, and related costs. In the opinion of management, the impact will not be material.
3. Pursuant to the completion of tenure of the Independent Directors on the Board of the Company, the Companys Board does not have the requisite number of Independent Directors, as required by the provision of SEBI Listing Regulations, Companies Act 2013 and Department of Public Enterprise Guidelines, so as to comply with the quorum as required under Regulation for Audit Committee Meeting under SEBI (LODR) Regulations.
The Annual Accounts for Financial Year ended on 31st March 2026 have therefore been approved by the Board of Directors of the Company on the recommendation of the Audit Committee of the Company being constituted without having requisite number of independent directors as required in terms of the Companies Act 2013 and SEBI Regulation.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of the above matters.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the year. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statement as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. We have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.
| S. Key Audit Matter No. | Auditors Response |
| 1 Revenue from Contract with Customer : Refer Note no. 2.27 and Note No 1.2.15 | Principal Audit Procedures: |
| Revenue is considered as a key audit matter because revenue is a key financial performance measure which could create an incentive to be recognised prematurely. | Our Audit Procedure comprises of assessing the application of the provisions of Ind AS 115 in respect of the Companys revenue recognition and appropriateness of the estimated adjustments in the process. |
| The revenue recognized by the Company in a particular contract is dependent on the sale agreement for the respective customer. Revenue from sale of manganese is recognized in financial statements at declared grade of manganese. Relevant areas for revenue recognition perspective are accuracy of the recognized amounts and timing of revenue recognition. | Our audit procedures include: |
| The timing of such revenue recognition in case of sale of goods is when the control over the same is transferred to the customer, which is mainly upon delivery. | Evaluating the design, the processes and internal controls relating to revenue accounting standard. |
| Revenue includes amounts in respect of royalty, district mineral fund and national mineral exploration trust contributions but excludes GST and any other taxes/cess. Sales are reduced to the extent of the amount of price discount. The Company acts as a principal to its customers, and all the performance obligation stands on the Company, therefore revenue is accounted on Gross basis. | Evaluating the detailed analysis performed by management on revenue streams by selecting samples for the existing contracts with customers and considering revenue recognition policy in the current year in respect of those revenue streams. |
| Manganese ore fines, hutch, dust and HIMS rejects generated during operations are recognised as production as and when they are sold and corresponding sales is treated as revenue from mining products. | Evaluating the appropriateness of the disclosures provided under the revenue standard and assessing the completeness and mathematical accuracy of the relevant disclosures. |
| Ensuring the basis of all estimates are commensurate with the accounting policy. | |
| The system of revenue recognition is found to be appropriate. | |
| 2 Inventory Valuation: | Principal Audit Procedures: |
| Refer Note No. 2.9 and 1.2.3 | Our audit approach involved the following combination of test of control design, implementations, operating effectiveness and substantive testing in respect of verification and valuation of inventories: |
| Verification and valuation of Inventories and related write down, if any, is a significant area requiring Managements judgment of estimates and application of accounting policies that have significant effect on the amounts recognized in the Standalone Ind AS Financial Statements. Accordingly, we consider this as a Key Audit Matter. | We evaluated the system of inventory monitoring and control. |
| Valuation is done on the following basis: | It was observed that inventory has been physically verified by the Management during the year. |
| (a) Finished Goods-Manganese Ore of all grades (except Manganese Ore Fines, Hutch Dust and HIMS rejects) - Valued At cost at mines including depreciation on mine assets or net realizable value, whichever is less. Similar items are grouped and actual sales realisation per tonne is considered for estimating weighted average cost and net realisable value | Production and inventory of manganese ore as well as bulk raw materials and ferro manganese was determined as per weight volume ratio by the production / technical department and the same are accounted for accordingly. |
| (b) Manganese Ore Fines, Hutch Dust and HIMS rejects - Valued At cost per tonne on jigging / processing, transportation etc. allocated on technical estimates or net realizable value, whichever is less. | We have also tested the values considered in respect of Net realizable value, cost of products and have verified these on a sample basis with the inventory valuation and accounting entries posted in this regard. |
| (c) Manganese Ore at port - At landed cost at the port or net realizable value, whichever is less. Landed cost includes freight, unloading charges, sampling charges etc. | We have obtained a copy of inventory verification report, cost sheet and price lists that have been taken into consideration while arriving at the final closing value of inventory. |
| (d) Electrolytic manganese di-oxide [EMD] (including stock as on 31st March at different stages of production, ascertained by technical estimation as a percentage of completed units of EMD) - | The system of inventory valuation and recording of stock level is generally found to be appropriate. |
| At current years cost of production including plants depreciation or net realizable value, whichever is less. | |
| (e) Ferro manganese/silico manganese including stock in cake form as on 31st March, determined by technical assessment - At current years cost of production including plants depreciation (less realizable value of slag) or net realizable price, whichever is less. | |
| (f) Stock in process - The quantity of Ferro Manganese/ Silico Manganese in process cannot be weighed, seen or assessed and hence, no value is assigned. | |
| (g) Stock of slag - Slag is a molten mass of impurities generated during manufacture of Ferro Manganese, which is treated as scrap and, accordingly, valued at net realizable price. | |
| 3 Deferred tax: | Principal Audit Procedures: |
| As disclosed in Note 3.8, the Company has recognised deferred tax assets in respect of certain deductions on account of provision for Leave Encashment, provision for Post-Retirement Medical Benefit, provision for Doubtful Debts and provision for Bonus to the extent that it is probable that they will get tax benefits in future. This requires management judgement in estimating future taxable income and is accordingly a key audit matter. | Our audit procedures included the following: |
| Obtaining an understanding of the managements process for estimating the recoverability of the deferred tax assets and identifying key controls in the process. | |
| Obtaining and analysing the future projections of taxable profits estimated by management, assessing the key assumptions used, including the analysis of the consistency of the actual results obtained by the various segments with those projected in the previous year. | |
| We have reviewed the assumptions made by management for uncertain current and deferred tax positions to assess whether appropriate current and deferred tax provisions have been recognized and are based on the most probable outcome. We found the disclosures relating to the income tax and deferred tax balances to be appropriate. | |
| 4 Valuation of Defined Benefit Plan Obligations: | Principal Audit Procedures: |
| The valuation of the Companys defined benefit obligations involves significant judgment and estimation. It is based on actuarial assumptions such as discount rates, inflation, salary escalation, and mortality rates. These obligations are determined by discounting future cash flows to present value. | Our audit procedures focused on assessing the reasonableness of key actuarial assumptions such as discount rate, inflation, and mortality. We tested internal controls over the review and approval of these assumptions, as well as the completeness and accuracy of data provided to the external actuary, including reconciliation with actuarial reports. |
| The Company has recognized long-term employee benefit liabilities and post-employment benefits, and has engaged external actuarial experts to assist in determining appropriate assumptions and valuations. | We also discussed the valuation with management to identify any inconsistencies and verified the adequacy of disclosures in compliance with Ind AS 19. |
| Given the complexity of the calculations and the high degree of estimation involved, this was considered as a key audit matter. | Based on the procedures performed, the assumptions used by management in valuing the defined benefit obligations were found to be reasonable and supported by available evidence. |
| 5 Provision for Post-Retirement medical benefit: | Principal Audit Procedures: |
| The valuation provision of the PRMB requires assumptions which are based upon market conditions, discount rate, life expectancy of employees and other dependants to be considered for setting aside fund for medical benefit. | In testing the valuation, we have examined the reports of external actuarial specialist to review the key actuarial assumptions used, both financial and demographic, and considered the methodology utilized to derive these assumptions. |
| The setting of these assumptions is complex and requires the exercise of significant management judgement with the support of external actuary. | Furthermore, we have examined the sensitivity analysis adopted by the external party viz. actuarial on the key assumptions in valuing the defined benefit obligations. |
| We state that the methodology and assumptions applied in relation to determination of liability is acceptable. | |
| 6 Property, Plant & Equipment and Intangible Assets | Principal Audit Procedures: |
| As disclosed in Note 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4; during the year the Company has incurred capital expenditure on various Property, Plant and Equipment including the capitalisation of work in progress based on its readiness for intended use as determined by the management. The estimates of useful lives and residual value of Property, Plant and Equipment is a significant area which involves management judgement, technical assessment, consideration of historical experience, anticipated technical changes etc. | Our audit procedure included but was not limited to the following: |
| Considering the materiality in the context of the Balance Sheet of the Company and the level of management judgement and estimates required, the above matter has been determined as a key audit matter | Assessing the nature of additions made to PPE and capitalization of capital work in progress on a test check basis to test whether they meet the recognition criteria as per Ind-AS 16 -Property, Plant and Equipment, including its readiness for intended use as determined by the management. |
| Understanding, evaluating and testing the design and operating effectiveness of key controls relating to capitalization of various cost incurred. | |
| Reviewing the judgement and assessment of the management including the nature of underlying cost capitalized, determination of realizable value of the assets, appropriateness of assets lives applied in the calculation of depreciation. | |
| We have test checked the depreciation calculation | |
| We observe that the management has regularly reviewed the judgements and estimation. | |
| We have also assessed the adequacy and appropriateness of the disclosures in the standalone financial statements. | |
| Based on the audit procedures involved, we observe that the assumptions made by the management were acceptable. | |
| 7 Export sales in the Capacity of State Trading Enterprise / Canalizing Agent | Principal Audit Procedures: |
| Export sales where the Company has been appointed as a canalizing agent represent transactions wherein the Company facilitates the export of goods without assuming significant risks and rewards of ownership. In such arrangements, the Company earns a fixed 3% as commission or service fee for its role as an intermediary rather than recognizing the gross value of exports as revenue. | Our audit procedures focused on reviewing contractual arrangements to understand the Companys role as a canalizing agent and assessing whether it acts as a principal or agent in accordance with Ind AS 115. |
| Accordingly, such transactions require careful evaluation of the underlying contractual terms to determine whether the Company is acting as a principal or an agent in accordance with Ind AS 115. The accounting treatment should reflect the substance of the arrangement, with only the commission income being recognized as revenue where the Company acts as an agent. Proper disclosure of the nature of such arrangements and the basis of revenue recognition is also required to be made. Given the judgment involved in evaluating the nature of the arrangement and ensuring appropriate revenue recognition and disclosures, this area was considered a key audit matter. | We tested export transactions by verifying supporting documents, calculations, fund flows, and reconciliation with shipping records. |
| These procedures enabled us to conclude that revenue recognition and disclosures for such export arrangements are appropriate. |
Information other than the Standalone Financial Statements and Auditors Report thereon
The Companys Management and Board of Directors is responsible for the preparation of the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Management Discussion and Analysis, Boards Annual Report including Annexures to Boards Report, Business Responsibility Report, Corporate Governance Report and Shareholders Information, Corporate Social Responsibility but does not include the Financial Statements and our Audit Report thereon.
Our opinion on the Standalone Financial Statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the Standalone Financial Statements, our responsibility is to read the other information when it becomes available and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the Standalone Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to communicate the matter to those charged with governance, as applicable under relevant laws and regulations.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Financial Statements
The Companys Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) with respect to the preparation and presentation of these Standalone Financial Statement that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance including other comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and cash flow of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) specified under section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 issued thereunder. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provision of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting fraud and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of Standalone Financial Statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the Standalone Financial Statements, Board of Directors is responsible for assessing the Companys ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. The Companys Board of Directors is also responsible for overseeing the Companys financial reporting process.
Auditors Responsibility for the Audit of Standalone Financial Statements
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Companys preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Companys Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Financial Statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken based on these Financial Statements. As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also: i. Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for oneresultingfromerror,asfraudmayinvolvecollusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
ii. Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under Section 143(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the entity has adequate internal financial controls system in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls. iii. Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management. iv. Conclude on the appropriateness of managements and Board of Directors use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditors report to the related disclosures in the Standalone Financial Statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditors report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern. v. Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the Standalone Financial Statements, including the disclosures, and whether the Standalone Financial Statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
Materiality is the magnitude of misstatements in the Standalone Financial Statements that, individually or in aggregate, makes it probable that the economic decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable user of the Standalone Financial Statements may be influenced. We consider quantitative materiality and qualitative factors in (i) planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of any identified misstatements in the Standalone Financial Statements.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards. From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the Standalone Financial Statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditors report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
ReportonotherLegalandregulatoryrequirements:
1. As required by section 143(3) of the Act, based on our audit, we report that: a. We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations, which, to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit. b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books. c. The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss including Other Comprehensive Income and Statement of Cash Flow and the Statement of Changes in Equity dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account. d. In our opinion, the aforesaid Standalone Financial Statements comply with the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) specified under Section 133 of the Act, subject to Emphasis of Matter stated above. e. In terms of Notification no. G.S.R. 463 (E) dated 05th June 2015 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, provisions of Section 164(2) of the Act regarding disqualifications of the Directors, are not applicable as it is a Government Company.
f. With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls with reference to Standalone Financial Statements of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in Annexure A. Our report expresses an unmodified opinion on the adequacy and operating effectiveness of the Companys internal financial controls with reference to Standalone Financial Statement. g. Based on our audit, we report that the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act are not applicable to the Company since the Company is a Government company as defined under section 2(45) of the Act. Accordingly, reporting under section 197(16) is not applicable. h. As per notification number G.S.R. 463 (E) dated 5th June 2015 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, section 197 of the Act as regards managerial remuneration is not applicable to the Company, since it is a Government Company i. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditors Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us: i. The company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations as at March 31, 2026, on its financial position in its standalone financial statements- Refer Note 3.15 (i) (a) & (b) to the Standalone Financial Statements. ii. There are no long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which provision for material foreseeable losses is required. iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company. iv. a) The Management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in the notes to the accounts, no funds (which are material either individually or in aggregate) have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or share premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the company to or in any other persons or entities, including foreign entities (Intermediaries), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Intermediary shall, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or provide any guarantee, security or the like in behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries. b) The Management has represented, that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in the notes to accounts, no funds (which are material either individually or in the aggregate) have been received by the Company from any persons or entities, including foreign entities (Funding Parties), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries. c) Based on the audit procedures performed that have been considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to our notice that has caused us to believe that the representations under subclause (i) and (ii) of rule 11(e) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, as provided under (a) & (b) above contain any material misstatement.
2. The dividend declared or paid during the year by the Company is in compliance with Section 123 of the Act.
3. Based on our examination which includes test checks, it appears that the Company has used an accounting software (SAP) for maintaining its books of accounts which has a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility and the same has operated throughout the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the software. Further, during the course of our audit, we did not come across any instance of audit trail feature being tampered with or disabled. The requirement to preserve the audit trail as per Section 128(5) of Companies Act 2013 has been complied with by the Company.
4. As required under section 143(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 we give in the Annexure B a statement on directions issued by the Comptroller & Auditor General of India after complying with the suggested methodology of audit, action taken thereon and its impact on the accounts and Standalone Financial Statement of the Company.
5. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2020 (the Order), issued by the Central Government in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, we give in the Annexure C a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.
Annexure A
to the Independent Auditors Report 2025-26
(Referred to in paragraph 1 (f) under Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements section of our report and in terms of section 143 (3)(i) of the Act)
Report on the Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting under Clause (i) of Subsection 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act)
We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of MOIL Limited (the Company) as of 31 March 2026 in conjunction with our audit of the Standalone Ind AS financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.
Managements Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls
The Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to companys policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting (the Guidance Note) and the Standards on Auditing, issued by ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting were established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.
Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditors judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Companys internal financial controls system over financial reporting.
Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting
A companys internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting
Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management of override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Opinion
In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at 31 March 2026, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
| Name of statute | Amount demanded (In Rs. lakhs) | Amount Paid under protest (In Rs. lakhs) | Period to which amount relates | Forum where dispute is pending |
| M.P.Entry Tax Act 1975 | 13.68 | 8.45 | 2008-09 | M.P. High Court, Jabalpur |
| M.P.Entry Tax Act 1975 | 6.28 | 6.28 | 2012-13 | M.P. Commercial Tax Appellate Board, Bhopal |
| M.P.Entry Tax Act 1975 | 2.86 | 0.72 | 2013-14 | 1st appeal to M.P. Commercial Tax Appeals, Jabalpur |
| M.P.Entry Tax Act 1975 | 21.75 | 5.44 | 2014-15 | 1st appeal to M.P. Commercial Tax Appeals, Jabalpur |
| M.P.Entry Tax Act 1975 | 10.72 | 2.68 | 2015-16 | 1st appeal to M.P. Commercial Tax Appeals, Jabalpur |
| M.P.Vat Act 2002 | 3.68 | 1.47 | 2011-12 | M.P. Commercial Tax, Chhindwara |
| M.P.Vat Act 2002 | 9.15 | 6.66 | 2012-13 | M.P.Commercial Tax Appellate Board,Bhopal |
| M.P.CST Act 1956 | 6.10 | 1.53 | 2013-14 | 1st appeal to M.P. Commercial Tax Appeals, Jabalpur |
| M S CST ACT 1956 | 0.40 | 0 | 2010-11 | Sales tax Appeallate M.S. |
| M S CST ACT1956 | 2.01 | 0 | 2011-12 | Sales tax Appellate M.S. |
| M S VAT ACT 2002 | 3.24 | 1.08 | 2010-11 | Sales tax Appellate M.S. |
| M S VAT ACT 2002 | 0.71 | 0.47 | 2011-12 | Sales tax Appellate M.S. |
| MGST ACT 2017 | 7.20 | 3.30 | 2018-19 | Assessing Officer, LTU-1, Nagpur |
| MGST ACT 2017 | 180.73 | 7.08 | 2021-22 | Appeal has been filed before Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Nagpur |
| MPGST ACT 2017 | 424.76 | 23.33 | 2021-22 | Appeal has been filed before Commissioner, Appeal of State Tax Bhopal |
| MPGST ACT 2017 | 211.24 | 0.00 | 2022-23 | Appeal filed against the order of Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Chhindwara Division, Jabalpur |
| Profession Tax Act 1975 | 2.27 | 1.13 | 2006-07 | Sales tax appellate M.S. |
| Profession Tax Act 1975 | 7.70 | 1.93 | 2007-08 | Sales tax appellate M.S. |
| Central Excise - IMB | 50525.43 | 1082.69 | Mar. 2011- Dec. 2015 | M.P. High Court, Jabalpur |
| Service Tax Act, 1994 | 184.74 | 55.67 | 2012-13 to 2016-17 | Central Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai |
| Service Tax Act, 1994 | 732.51 | 17.73 | April 2016 to June 2017 | Commissioner Appeal, CGST & Excise |
| Service Tax Act, 1994 | 5.09 | 0.11 | April 2016 to June 2017 | Add. Commissioner CGST & C.Ex, Jabalpur. |
| Collector Balaghat | 1731.67 | 2002-03 & 2007-08 | District Mining Office, Balaghat | |
| *Income Tax Act, 1961 | 133.67 | 133.67 | 2017-18 | Commissioner Appeals, Income tax |
| *Income Tax Act, 1961 | 70.10 | 70.10 | 2018-19 | Assessing Officer, Income tax |
| *Income Tax Act, 1961 | 633.86 | 613.19 | 2019-20 | Commissioner Appeals, Income tax |
| *Income Tax Act, 1961 | 99.72 | 99.72 | 2020-21 | Assessing Officer, Income tax amount refunded on 15.04.2025 |
| *Income Tax Act, 1961 | 27.94 | 27.94 | 2005-06 | VSV Demand adjustment |
| *Income Tax Act, 1961 | 49.56 | 49.56 | 2007-08 | VSV Demand adjustment |
| *Income Tax Act, 1961 | 27.71 | 27.71 | 2013-14 | VSV Demand adjustment |
| *Income Tax Act, 1961 | 100.69 | 100.69 | 2015-16 | VSV Demand adjustment |
| Gram Panchayat, Chikla Mine | 148.88 | 0 | 2019-20 to 2025-26 | High Court, Nagpur |
| Gram Panchayat, Sitasaongi Mine | 193.78 | 0 | 2019-20 to 2025-26 | High Court, Nagpur |
Other matters
We bring to the attention of the users the overview of the internal financial control system over financial reporting and the operating effectiveness of such internal financial controls over financial reporting which was done by us indicated areas where the internal control system requires to be strengthened further.
Such matters are summarized below:
The Company has not followed a process of periodic review of the Audit trail process to ensure that the data collected is complete, accurate, and consistent. The Company is required to conduct a review of the audit trails on a daily, weekly, monthly or periodic basis depending on whether it is a high, medium or low risk area. However, we note that such review had been conducted only for two quarters and the report for the same was received after the completion of the financial year.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of the above matters.
IIFL Customer Care Number
(Gold/NCD/NBFC/Insurance/NPS)
1860-267-3000 / 7039-050-000
IIFL Capital Services Support WhatsApp Number
+91 9892691696
IIFL Capital Services Limited - Stock Broker SEBI Regn. No: INZ000164132 (Member ID - NSE: 10975 BSE: 179 MCX: 55995 NCDEX: 01249), DP SEBI Reg. No. IN-DP-185-2016, IA SEBI Regn. No: INA000000623, Merchant Banker SEBI Regn. No. INM000010940, RA SEBI Regn. No: INH000000248, BSE Enlistment Number (RA): 5016, AMFI-Registered Mutual Fund Distributor & SIF Distributor
ARN NO : 47791 (Date of initial registration – 17/02/2007; Current validity of ARN – 08/02/2027), PFRDA Reg. No. PoP 20092018, IRDAI Corporate Agent (Composite) : CA1099

This Certificate Demonstrates That IIFL As An Organization Has Defined And Put In Place Best-Practice Information Security Processes.