Container Corporation Of India Ltd Auditor Reports

TO THE MEMBERS OF

CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED

Report on the Audit of Standalone Financial Statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED (the Company), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 st March, 2026, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including other comprehensive income), the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended and notes to the Standalone financial statements, including a summary of material accounting policies and other explanatory information (herein after referred to as the standalone financial statements).

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid Standalone Financial Statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Act read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules,2015, as amended (Ind AS) and other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 st March 2026, its profit (including other comprehensive income), changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Basis of Opinion

We conducted our audit of the standalone financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under Section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act). Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the Auditors Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the standalone financial statements under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence obtained by us is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Emphasis of Matters

We draw the attention to:

a) Refer Note no. 30, 39 and 51, which describe payment of Land License Fee to Indian Railways for land leased to it on the basis of company assessment in line with Master circular dated 04.10.2022 issued by Ministry of Railway and is not final. In view of the uncertainty of the lease terms, No Right of Use (ROU) has been assessed as required under Ind AS 116.

b) . Refer Note no. 12 of the financial statements, which discloses trade receivables of ^29.34 crore that have remained outstanding for more than three years. The management has made a provision for doubtful debts amounting to ^4.82 crore. No provision has been made for the remaining ^24.52 crore, which includes ^6.52 crore from certain parties against whom the company has initiated legal proceedings. The ultimate outcome of these litigations remains uncertain.

c) . Balances of Sundry Debtors, Sundry Creditors, advances etc. to/from parties including Railways shown in financial statements are subject to confirmation/reconciliation as referred to Note no. 68(a). These balances include outstanding for more than three years. The effect of the same is not ascertainable.

d) . Refer Note 2.8 and Note 32.2 to the financial statements, wherein the Company has re-assessed the estimated useful life of LNG Trucks and Trailers and revised the same from 8 years to 15 years.

Consequently, the depreciation expense recognised during the current financial year has been reduced by Rs. 8.07 Crores on account of such change in accounting estimate.

Our opinion is not modified in respect of the above matters

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current year ended 31 st March 2026.

We have determined that there are no key audit matters to communicate in our report.

Information Other than the Standalone Financial Statements and Auditors Report Thereon

The Companys Board of Directors is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the Management Discussion and Analysis, Directors Report including annexure to Directors Report, Business Responsibility Report, Corporate Governance, ten years Financial/physical performance and data and letter from CMD included in the annual report of the company, but does not include the standalone financial statements and our auditors report thereon. The annual report is expected to be made available to us after the date of this auditors report.

Our opinion on the standalone financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the standalone financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above when it becomes available and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the standalone financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to communicate the fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Standalone Financial Statements

The Companys Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the Board of Directors is responsible for assessing the Companys ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

The Companys Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Companys financial reporting process.

Auditors Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect

a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:

a) Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial results, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

b) Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under Section 143(3) (i) of the Act, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the company has adequate Internal Financial Control System in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.

c) Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the Board of Directors.

d) Conclude on the appropriateness of the Board of Directors use of the going concern basis of accounting and based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditors report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditors report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

e) Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the standalone financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

Materiality is the magnitude of misstatements in the standalone financial statements that, individually or in aggregate, makes it probable that the economic decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable user of the standalone financial statements may be influenced. We consider quantitative materiality and qualitative factors in (i) planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of any identified misstatements in the standalone financial statements.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditors report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements:

1. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) order, 2020 (the Order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the

Act, we give in the Annexure A , a statement on the

matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the order, to the extent applicable.

2. The Comptroller & Auditor General of India has issued directions indicating the areas to be examined in terms of Sub section (5) of Section 143 of the Act, compliance of which are set out in Annexure B .

3. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

a. We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

b. In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

c. The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including other comprehensive income), the Statement of Changes in Equity and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of accounts.

d. In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Indian Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act.

e. As per the notification number G.S.R. 463(E) dated 5 th June, 2015 issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, section 164(2) of the Act regarding the disqualifications of Directors is not applicable to the Company, since it is a Government Company.

f. With respect to the adequacy of internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in Annexure C .

g. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditors Report, as per notification number G.S.R. 463(E) dated 5 th June, 2015 issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, section 197(16) of the Act regarding the Managerial Remuneration is not applicable to the Company, since it is a Government Company.

h. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditors Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations/arbitrations on its financial position in its standalone financial statements. Refer note no. 42 to the standalone financial statements.

ii. The company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

iv. (a) The Management of the Company have represented to us that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, no funds (which are material either individually or in the aggregate) have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or share premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the Company to or in any other person or entity, including foreign entity Intermediaries), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Intermediary shall, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company or any of such subsidiaries (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries.

(b) The Management of the Company has represented to us that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, no funds (which are material either individually or in the aggregate) have been received by the Company or any of such subsidiaries from any person or entity, including foreign entity (Funding Parties), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries.

(c) Based on the audit procedures that have been considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances performed by us on the Company, nothing has come to our notice that has caused us to believe that the representations under sub-clause (i) and (ii) of Rule ll(e), as provided under (a) and (b) above, contain any material misstatement.

v. As stated in Note 19.2 to the standalone financial statements:

a. The final dividend proposed in the previous year, declared and paid by the Company during the year is in accordance with Section 123 of the Act, as applicable.

b. The interim dividend declared and paid by the Company during the year and until the date of this report is in compliance with Section 123 of the Act.

c. The Board of Directors of the Company have proposed final dividend for the year which is subject to the approval of the members at the ensuing Annual General Meeting. The amount of dividend proposed is in accordance with section 123 of the Act, as applicable.

vi. We draw attention to the fact that, as on March 31 st , 2026, the Company have three Independent Directors on its Board, which is not in compliance with the requirements of Section 149(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 and relevant provisions of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.

vii. Based on our examination which included test checks, the company has used an accounting software (i.e. Oracle e Business Suite) for maintaining its books of account for the Financial Year ended 31 st March 2026 which has a feature of recording audit trail (Edit Log) facility and the same has been operated throughout the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the software. During the course of our audit, we did not come across any instance of audit trail feature being tampered with. Further, the same has been preserved as per the statutory requirements for record retention.

For Hem Sandeep & Co.

Chartered Accountants FRN:009907N

	CA. Priyank Varshney
	Partner
Place: Delhi	M. No. 421308
Date: 25 th May 2026	UDIN: 26421308GIWZTE8909

Annexure - A to the Independent Auditors Report

(Referred to Paragraph - 1 under the Report on other Legal and Regulatory requirements section of our report to the Members of Container Corporation of India Limited of even date)

To the best of our information and according to the explanations provided to us by the Company and the books of account and records examined by us in the normal course of audit, we state that:

i. In respect of the Companys Property, Plant and Equipment and Intangible Assets:

a. (A) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of Property, Plant and Equipment and relevant details of right-of-use assets.

(B) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars of intangible assets.

b. The Company has a program of physical verification of Property, Plant and Equipment and right-of use assets which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. According to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c. Based on our examination of the records of the company, we report that, the title in respect of self- constructed buildings and title deeds of all other immovable properties (other than properties where the company is the lessee and the lease agreements are duly executed in favour of the lessee), disclosed in the financial statements included under Property, Plant and Equipment are held in the name of the Company as at the balance sheet date except the cases given in Appendix-I where title deeds of immovable properties are not held in the name of the company.

d. The Company has not revalued any of its Property, Plant and Equipment (including right-of-use assets) and intangible assets during the year.

e. No proceedings have been initiated during the year or are pending against the Company as at March 31, 2026 for holding any benami property under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 (as amended in 2016) and rules made there under.

ii. (a) The Company has carried out physical verification

of inventory at the year end and in our opinion, the coverage and procedure of such verification is appropriate. As per the information and explanations given to us, no discrepancies of 10% or more in the aggregate for each class of inventory were noticed during such verification, and as such no adjustments were required to be made in the books of accounts.

(b) The Company has not been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of Rs. 5 crores, in aggregate, at any points of time during the year, from banks or financial institutions on the basis of security of current assets and hence reporting under clause 3(ii) (b) of the Order is not applicable.

iii. The Company, during the year, has made additional investment of Rs.42.80 crores as equity share capital in Angul Sukinda Railway Limited (ASRL), its joint venture. In our opinion, the investment made during the year is not prejudicial to the Companys interest. However, the Company has not provided any guarantee or security or granted any loans or advances in the nature of loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships or any other parties. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(iii) (a) to (f) of the Order are not applicable to the company except clause 3(iii) (b) for investment made.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of loans granted, investments made and guarantees and securities provided, as applicable.

v. The Company has not accepted any deposit or amounts which are deemed to be deposits. Hence, reporting under clause 3(v) of the Order is not applicable.

vi. The maintenance of cost records has not been specified by the Central Government under sub-section (1) of section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the business activities carried out by the Company. Hence, reporting under clause 3(vi) of the Order is not applicable to the Company

vii. In respect of statutory dues:

a. In our opinion, the Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Goods and Services tax, Provident Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, duty of Custom, duty of Excise, Value Added Tax, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it with the appropriate authorities, except Provident Fund (PF) dues amounting to Rs.52,74,474/- pertaining to September 2025, which is outstanding for approximately six months as on 31 st March 2026. The same could not be deposited within the stipulated time due to technical issues on the PF portal. However, the amount was subsequently deposited on 06 th May 2026. Further, there were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Goods and Service tax, Provident Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, duty

of Custom, duty of Excise, Value Added Tax, Cess and other material statutory dues in arrears as at March 31, 2026 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

b. Details of statutory dues referred to in sub-clause (a) above which have not been deposited as on March 31 st ,2026 on account of disputes are mentioned in Appendix-II.

viii. There were no transactions relating to previously unrecorded income that have been surrendered or disclosed as income during the year in the tax assessments under the Income Tax Act, 1961(43 of 1961).

ix. (a) The Company has not taken any loans or other borrowings from any lender. Hence reporting under clause 3(ix)(a) of the Order is not applicable.

(b) The Company has not been declared wilful defaulter by any bank or financial institution or government or any government authority.

(c) The Company has not taken any term loan during the year and there are no outstanding term loans at the beginning of the year and hence, reporting under clause 3(ix)(c) of the Order is not applicable.

(d) According to the information and explanations given to us, funds have not been raised on short- term basis. Hence, reporting under clause 3(ix)(d) of the order is not applicable.

(e) On an overall examination of the financial statements of the Company, the Company has not taken any funds from any entity or person on account of or to meet the obligations of its subsidiaries.

(f) The Company has not raised any loans during the year on the pledge of securities held in its subsidiaries, joint ventures or associate companies and hence reporting on clause 3(ix)(f) of the Order is not applicable.

x. (a) The Company, during the year, has not raised moneys by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments) and hence reporting under clause 3(x)(a) of the Order is not applicable.

(b) The Company, during the year, has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or convertible debentures (fully or partly or optionally) and hence reporting under clause 3(x)(b) of the order is not applicable.

xi. (a) No fraud by the Company and no fraud on the

Company has been noticed or reported during the year and hence reporting under clause 3(xi)(a) of the Order is not applicable.

(b) No report under sub-section (12) of section 143 of the Companies Act has been filed in Form ADT-4 as prescribed under rule 13 of Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 with the Central Government, during the year and up to the date of this report.

(c) As per the information and explanations given to us, no whistle blower complaints have been received by the company during the year.

xii. The Company is not a Nidhi Company and hence reporting under clause 3(xii) of the Order is not applicable.

xiii. In our opinion, the Company is in compliance with Section 177 and 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 with respect to applicable transactions with the related parties and the details of related party transactions have been disclosed in the standalone financial statements as required by the applicable accounting standards.

xiv. (a) As per information and explanations given to us, the company has appointed independent firms of Chartered Accountants for conduct of Internal Audit. In our opinion, the internal audit system commensurate with the size and the nature of its business.

(b) We have considered the internal audit reports for the year under audit, issued to the Company during the year and till date, in determining the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures.

xv. In our opinion, during the year, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with its directors or persons connected with its directors and hence provisions of section 192 of the Companies Act, 2013 are not applicable to the Company.

xvi. (a) In our opinion, the Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. Hence, reporting under clause 3(xvi)(a), (b) and (c) of the Order is not applicable.

(b) In our opinion, there is no core investment company within the Group (as defined in the Core Investment Companies (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016) and accordingly reporting under clause 3(xvi)(d) of the Order is not applicable.

xvii. The Company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and the immediately preceding financial year.

xviii. There has been no resignation of the statutory auditors of the Company during the year.

xix. On the basis of the financial ratios, ageing and expected dates of realisation of financial assets and payment of financial liabilities, other information accompanying the financial statements and our knowledge of the Board of Directors and Management plans and based on our examination of the evidence supporting the assumptions, nothing has come to our attention, which causes us to believe that any material uncertainty exists as on the date CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED

of the audit report indicating that Company is not capable of meeting its liabilities existing at the date of balance sheet as and when they fall due within a period of one year from the balance sheet date. We, however, state that this is not an assurance as to the future viability of the Company. We further state that our reporting is based on the facts up to the date of the audit report and we neither give any guarantee nor any assurance that all liabilities falling due within a period of one year from the balance sheet date, will get discharged by the Company as and when they fall due.

xx. (a) There are no unspent amounts towards Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on other than on-going projects requiring a transfer to a Fund specified in Schedule VII to the Companies Act in compliance with second proviso to subsection (5) of Section 135 of the said Act. Accordingly, reporting under clause 3(xx)(a) of the Order is not applicable for the year.

(b) In respect of ongoing projects, the Company has transferred unspent Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) amount as at the end of the previous financial year, to a Special account within a period of 30 days from the end of the said financial year in compliance with the provision of section 135(6) of the Act.

	For Hem Sandeep & Co. Chartered Accountants FRN:009907N
Place: Delhi Date: 25 th May 2026	CA. Priyank Varshney Partner M. No. 421308 UDIN: 26421308GIWZTE8909

APPENDIX-I

Cases where title deeds of Immovable properties are not held in the name of the company: -

Areas/ CO	Description of property		Gross carrying value	Held in name of		Whether promoter, director or their relative or employee	Period held- indicate range, where appropriate		Reason for not being held in name of company
Area-I	Kanakpura (Jaipur)		1,52,68,500.70	Indian Railway		N.A.	03-Jan-02		Agreement not executed
Area-I	Ravtha Road (Kota)		-	Indian Railway		N.A.	11-Nov-13		Agreement executed, however period not mentioned in deed
Area-II	Freehold Land at Varnama		11,38,34,006.00	Land Owners- Farmers of Varanama Village		Not Applicable	2014 & 2019		Acquisition completed. Updation in Govt record is pending (7/12)
Area-II	Freehold Land at Varnama		7,09,53,065.00	Land Owners- Farmers of Varanama Village		Not Applicable	2022		Acquisition completed. Updation in Govt record is pending (7/12)
Area-II	Aurangabad 3-Housing flats Purchased from CIDCO		9,47,726.00	City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd., (CIDCO)		Not Applicable	12 May 2000		Possession slips issued by City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd., (CIDCO) for all the three flats (no.5,9 &12 at N-4, Shopping Complex at Aurangabad) are in the name of Company.
Area-II	Mumbai, Powai 10 LIG flats Purchased from MHADA		1,50,05,850.00	MHADA (Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority)		Not Applicable	01 May 1998		No title deed or agreement executed by MHADA & only allotment / possession letter issued by MHADA is available.
Area-II	Building no. 19, Oshiwara, Mumbai- 2 MIG flats Purchased from MHADA		56,12,658.00	MHADA (Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority)		Not Applicable	01 May 1998		No title deed or agreement executed by MHADA & only allotment / possession letter issued by MHADA is available.
Area-II	Building no. 16, Oshiwara, Mumbai-2 MIG flats Purchased from MHADA		62,96,452.00	MHADA (Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority)		Not Applicable	01 May 1998		No title deed or agreement executed by MHADA & only allotment / possession letter issued by MHADA is available.
Area-III	Freehold land at Krishnapatnam (Land Area- 141.95 Acs)		33,30,01,871.00	Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation		Not Applicable	21-Mar-18		The sale agreement for the said land was executed With Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC) on 21.03.2018. However, in-accordance with clause 3 of the sale agreement, which mentions that CONCOR should execute sale deed on implementation of the project and commencement of Commercial production, the sale deed can executed only after the project is completed, which is under process.
Area-III	Leasehold at SRO (RAILWAY QUARTER)		1,30,00,000.00	Southern Railway		Not Applicable	2010		The draft lease deed was prepared by Company and submitted to Zonal Railway for approval and the same is awaited.
Area-III	Leasehold at SRO (REGIONAL OFFICE BUILDING)		2,00,00,000.00	Southern Railway		Not Applicable	2014
Area-III	Residential Flat		17,00,000.00	Southern Railway		Not Applicable	11-Jun-99
Area-III	Residential Flat		22,00,000.00	Southern Railway		Not Applicable	01-Jun-98
Area-III	Leasehold land at MMLP Naya Raipur (land area 2.99 acres)			South East Central Railways		Not Applicable	Sep-22		In Sept-2022, the permanent connectivity has been made and connected with the newly commissioned Naya Raipur Railway Station. In this connection, to arrive at exact Railway area used by CONCOR, a joint survey has been carried out by Railways/CONCOR and submitted the Land Licensing Plan for approval to Railways. The revised land area is = 12598 Sqms. Once the land plan gets approved, the land licensing agreement will be executed with Railways.
Areas/ CO		Description of property	Gross carrying value	Held in name of	Whether promoter, director or their relative or employee			Period held- indicate range, where appropriate		Reason for not being held in name of company
Area-III		Leasehold land at Sanathnagar (land area 9.24 acres)		South Central Railway	Not Applicable			23-May-01		CONCOR had leased a parcel of railway land measuring 9.24 acres at ICD Sanathnagar. However, the lease agreement for this land has not yet been executed. Continuous follow-up is being carried out with the Railways to finalize the draft lease agreement for the land at ICD/SNF. A new agreement is due, and the matter has been apprised to the Railways. The relevant information will be provided after the agreement is finalized with the Railways.
Area-IV		Land taken on lease at CTKR Terminal from Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port Trust	42,77,24,118.77	Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port Trust	Not Applicable			25-02-2004		The Land Lease Agreement with Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port Trust for 85,500 Sq. metres of land taken on lease at CTKR Terminal got expired on 24-02-2019. CONCOR has requested and appealed to port authorities for 50% concession in lease rent but no formal decision has been received from the port authorities. The execution of the lease deed will be taken up after the response of port authorities.
Area-IV		Land taken on lease at Shalimar Terminal from South Eastern Railways		South Eastern Railways	Not Applicable			01-02-1992		CONCOR has taken a land on lease from South Eastern Railways measuring 15.01 Acres for a period of 30 years with effect from 01-02-1992. The Lease agreement got expired on 31-01-2022 and pending for renewal as on the reporting date of the balance sheet for FY 2021-22.The lease agreement is pending on account of difference in the area of the land taken on lease as per South Eastern Railways and CONCOR. Once the issue in the area of land taken on lease is resolved, the lease agreement will be executed.
Area-IV		Land taken on lease at MMLP Jharsuguda Terminal from South Eastern Railways		South Eastern Railways	Not Applicable			26-08-2016		CONCOR has taken a land on lease from South Eastern Railways measuring 2.142 Acres for a period of 5 years with effect from 26-08-2016. The Lease agreement got expired on 25-08-2021 and pending for renewal as on the reporting date of the balance sheet for FY 2021-22. CONCOR has taken up the issue of non-execution of lease agreement with concerned railways and awaiting necessary action from railways side.
Area-IV		Office Space taken on Lease at Shalimar Terminal from South Eastern Railways		South Eastern Railways	Not Applicable			01-02-1992		CONCOR has taken an Office Space on rent from South Eastern Railways measuring 285 Sq. feet in respect of which no lease agreement has been entered. South Eastern Railways has raised Office rent invoices which are not in consonance with the Railway board circular no. 2010/ LML/18/64 dated 11-07-2018. The Company has represented to revise the office rent invoice as per the said railway board circular. However, revised bill is awaited from railways. The Execution of the lease agreement will be taken upon receipt of office rent invoice in accordance with the railway board circular dated 1107-2018.

APPENDIX-II

CO/Area	Name of the Statute	Nature of the Dues	Amount (Rs. in crores)	Period to which the amount relates	Forum where dispute is pending	Status of Dispute
CO	The Income Tax Act, 1961	Income Tax: Disallowance of deduction claimed for contribution to provident fund and superannuation fund	Rs. 1.76 (excluding interest of Rs 0.44)	AY 202021	Income Tax Depar tment	1. CONCOR received a communication under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 proposing an adjustment of ^1.76 crore in respect of employees contribution towards superannuation / employee welfare funds on the grounds of alleged delayed deposit beyond the prescribed due date under Section 36(1)(va).
						2. Although the Company submitted a detailed response within the stipulated timeline, the Central Processing Centre (CPC), Bengaluru proceeded with the adjustment while processing the return for Assessment Year 2020-21, resulting in reduction of the refund due. Aggrieved by the same, the Company filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on 26.08.2022.
						3. Vide order dated 07 November 2025 passed under Section 250, the appellate authority partly allowed the appeal and directed the Assessing Officer to verify the Companys claim and grant relief, wherever employee contributions were deposited within the statutory due dates.
						4. The Company has subsequently filed the necessary appeal effect request with the Assessing Officer, and the matter is currently under process.
CO	The Income Tax Act, 1961	Income Tax: Disallowance of deduction claimed under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961	Rs. 0.22 (excluding interest of Rs. 0.06)	AY 202021	Income Tax Depar tment	1. CONCOR had claimed a deduction under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of expenditure incurred towards CSR activity for supporting the operations of Varanasi Super 30 at Shivpur, Varanasi, undertaken under CONCORs CSR initiatives to impart residential coaching to 30 underprivileged students. The said activity was executed through the Centre for Social Responsibility and Leadership (CSRL), a registered civil society organization engaged in conducting seminars and training programmes.
						2. While computing the taxable income for Assessment Year 2020-21, a deduction of ^22,50,000 was claimed under Section 80G of the Act being 50% of Rs 45,00,000 incurred on aforementioned CSR Activity. However, the said claim was disallowed during the course of assessment.
						3. Aggrieved by the disallowance, CONCOR preferred an appeal before the CIT (Appeals) vide Acknowledgement No.610627680011022, dated 28.09.2022.
						4. The appellate proceedings are currently ongoing.

CO/Area	Name of the Statute	Nature of the Dues	Amount (Rs. in crores)	Period to which the amount relates	Forum where dispute is pending	Status of Dispute
CO	Service Tax	The said Statement of Demand alleges wrong availment of exemption of Rs.2,980 crore (abatement benefit on Transportation of rail freight services) and raised the demand on CONCOR of Rs.445.13 crore along with interest and penalties under sections 76 and 77.	445.13	April 2016 to June 2017	CESTAT Delhi	The said demand, amounting to ^445.13 crore, was dropped by the Additional Director General (Adjudication), DGGSTI, vide Order No. 82/2024- ST dated 30.04.2024. However, the Principal Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax, Delhi South Commissionerate, has filed an appeal before the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). In response, CONCOR has filed cross-objections before the CESTAT on 06.03.2025. The matter is currently pending before the Tribunal.
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	1 Post GST Audit FY 2017-18 to 201920, interest amount related to PDA was not deposited as in principle it is a deposit but department consider it as advance. 2. Post audit penalty amount was not deposited as per the law but department is demanding the same	0.06	2017 2020	Office of the Superintendent, CGST, Baddi	Penalty u/s 74 was not applicable as post audit the ITC and interest was already paid before issuing of SCN. Interest on PDA is not applicable as it is deposit in nature and not an advance. First Appellate authority order dated 19-08-2025 was received. Demand revised to ^4,68,500/-.FSTAT Appeal to be filed.
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	Under declaration of Ineligible ITC, Reversal as per Rule 42, ITC claimed from cancelled suppliers	7.31	2019-20	Office of : Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana, Punjab	Ineligible ITC not availed, Reversal as per Rule 42 already done monthly and annually, ITC not claimed from cancelled suppliers (Tax 3,67,97,887/- Interest 3,25,55,545/- Penalty 36,97,927/-) and Appeal is submitted.
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	GST Audit FY 2017-18 to 2022-23	0.01	2017-23	GST (AUDIT), CIRCLE BADDI	Related to GST Audit (ZD021125006501A dated 25-11-2025 Penalty 1,40,000/-) and Appeal is submitted.
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	Short payment of tax in GSTR-3B compared to GSTR-1	3.06	2021-22	Office of Joint Commissioner, Ward-CTO, Circle-D, Jaipur-III	Short payment of tax in GSTR-3B compared to GSTR-1, tax already been deposited (Tax- 17395775 Interest 11481209 Penalty 1739575 Total 30616559/-) and Appeal is submitted.
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	Ineligible ITC Passing/ Claimed- SASA Creations Pvt Ltd	0.24	2018-19	Office of the Superintendent, Okhla, Delhi South,	Passing/Availing of ineligible ITC-whereas in fact CONCOR has supplied the services to customer and the tax liability has already been deposited. And just because the customer is non-existent, non-operational GST dept asking for Tax and penalty (Tax-1222916+ Penalty 1222916/-) and Appeal is submitted.
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	Ineligible ITC Passing/ Claimed-Aadhar India	0.00	2018-19	Office of the Superintendent, Okhla, Delhi South,	Passing/Availing of ineligible ITC-whereas in fact CONCOR has supplied the services to customer and the tax liability has already been deposited. And just because the customer is non-existent, non-operational GST dept asking for Tax and penalty (Tax-3978+ Penalty 3978/-) and Appeal is submitted.
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	Ineligible ITC Passing/ Claimed-Navneet Enterprises	0.00	2018-19	Office of the Superintendent, Okhla, Delhi South,	Passing/Availing of ineligible ITC-whereas in fact CONCOR has supplied the services to customer and the tax liability has already been deposited. And just because the customer is non-existent, non-operational GST dept asking for Tax and penalty (Tax-1917+ Penalty 1917/-) and Appeal is submitted.

CO/Area	Name of the Statute	Nature of the Dues	Amount (Rs. in crores)	Period to which the amount relates	Forum where dispute is pending	Status of Dispute
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	Ineligible ITC Passing/ Claimed- Prachi Exports	0.00	2018-19	Office of the Superintendent, Okhla, Delhi South,	Passing/Availing of ineligible ITC-whereas in fact CONCOR has supplied the services to customer and the tax liability has already been deposited. And just because the customer is non-existent, non-operational GST dept asking for Tax and penalty (Tax-1134+ Penalty 1134/-) and Appeal is submitted.
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	Order Issued against SCN ZD080226022716G for Short Payment of GSTR-1 V/s GSTR 3B	0.92	2019-20	Office of the Joint Commissioner Circle-D, Jaipur III, AC / CTO Ward, Circle-D, Jaipur III, Jaipur-III, Rajasthan	GSTR-9 vs GSTR-1 liability difference, the tax is already deposited and Appeal to be filed.
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	Ineligible ITC Passing/ Claimed- Startling	0.01	2019-20	O/o Assistant Commissioner, GST Commissionera-te, CGST Okhla Division Delhi South, Bhikhaji Cama Place, R K Puram, New Delhi	Passing/Availing of ineligible ITC-whereas in fact CONCOR has supplied the services to customer and the tax liability has already been deposited. And just because the customer is non-existent, non-operational GST dept asking for Tax and penalty. Total tax and penalty amount- 1,21,023 and Appeal to be filed.
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	Ineligible ITC Passing/ Claimed- Scarlet	0.00	2019-20	O/o Assistant Commissioner, GST Commissionerat-e, CGST Okhla Division Delhi South, Bhikhaji Cama Place, R K Puram, New Delhi	Passing/Availing of ineligible ITC-whereas in fact CONCOR has supplied the services to customer and the tax liability has already been deposited. And just because the customer is non-existent, non-operational GST dept asking for Tax and penalty. Total tax and penalty amount- 3,324 and Appeal to be filed.
Area-I	Goods and Services Tax	Ineligible ITC Passing/ Claimed- ERA International	0.32	2019-20	Office of the Superintendent Jurisdiction : RANGE - 78, OKHLA, DELHI SOUTH, DELHI, CBIC, State/UT : Delhi	Passing/Availing of ineligible ITC-whereas in fact CONCOR has supplied the services to customer and the tax liability has already been deposited. And just because the customer is non-existent, non-operational GST dept asking for Tax and penalty. Total tax and penalty amount- 32,47,040 and Appeal to be filed.
Area-II	Goods and Services Tax	It has been alleged that GST is not paid on unbilled revenue.	0.12	FY 201819 TO FY 20-21	Appellate Authority, Additional/Joint Commissioner (Appeals), CGST & Central Excise, Indore.	A Show Cause Notice was issued in the said case, after which detailed replies were submitted to the GST department. However the same were not fully considered by the GST department and final order was issued in form of DRC-07 on 0804-2024. We have gone for appeal to Appellate authority for the issues raised. Order in appeal has been received in this case. Appeal before GSTAT is to be filed.
Area-II	Goods and Services Tax	The said order contains issues such as: Ineligible ITC availed, Excess ITC availed in GSTR-3B as compared to table 8A of GSTR-9 , GST not paid for various services received which are covered under RCM, short payment of GST on account of services provided under SAC 996711 and 996719	0.55	FY 201718 TO FY 202223	Commissioner (Appeal-I), CGST & C.Ex, Mumbai	A Show Cause Notice was issued in the said case, after which detailed replies were submitted to the GST department. Detailed explanations were also provided during the Personal hearing. However, all the issues were not fully considered by the GST department and final order was issued in form DRC07 dated 31-01-2025. We have gone for appeal to the Appellate authority against the Order issued. Order in appeal has been received in this case. Appeal before GSTAT is to be filed.

CO/Area	Name of the Statute	Nature of the Dues	Amount (Rs. in crores)	Period to which the amount relates	Forum where dispute is pending	Status of Dispute
Area-II	Goods and Services Tax	The brief of the case is that department has disallowed transitional credit of Rs.30,70,234/- under CGST head on the grounds that CONCOR failed to claim transitional credit under table 6K/6L of GSTR-9 or GSTR-9C and also despite repeated communications with CGST Authorities, no verification report of such TRAN-1 credit availed by CONCOR under CGST Act, 2017 was provided by Central Jurisdictional Authority till date. Hence the dispute of TRAN-1 credit of Rs. 30,70,234/-.	0.31	FY 201718	Appellate Authority, Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Mumbai	A Show Cause Notice was issued in the said case, after which detailed replies were submitted to the GST department. However the same were not fully considered by the GST department and final order was issued in form of DRC07. We have gone for appeal to the Appellate authority against the Order issued.
Area-II	Goods and Services Tax	The said order contains issues such as : Excess availment of ITC, Short payment of tax, when compared with outward tax liability declared in GSTR-9 and outward	2.76	FY 18-19	Appellate Authority, Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Mumbai	A Show Cause Notice was issued in the said case, after which detailed replies were submitted to the GST department. However the same were not fully considered by the GST department and final order was issued in form of DRC07 dated 29.04.2024. We have gone for appeal to the Appellate authority against the Order issued.
		supply reported in GSTR-3B, availment of Inadmissible ITC, reversal of ITC on Credit Notes appearing in GSTR 2A.
Area-II	Goods and Services Tax	The said order contains issues such as : ITC claimed from GSTR 3B non-filer, Excess IGST claimed by CONCOR in GSTR 3B/9 is not confirmed in GSTR 2A or 8A of GSTR-9.	2.92	FY 19-20	Appellate Authority, Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Mumbai	A Show Cause Notice was issued in the said case, after which detailed replies were submitted to the GST department. However the same were not fully considered by the GST department and final order was issued in form DRC07 dated 26.08.2024. We have gone for appeal to the Appellate authority against the Order issued.
Area-II	Goods and Services Tax	The brief of the case is that as per impugned Order dated 27.04.2024, CONCOR has excess claimed the ITC as well as there are short reversals on account of Section 42/43.	2.92	FY 18-19	Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Appellate Authority, Gujarat Ghatak 7 (Ahmedabad): Range- 2:Division - 1:Gujarat	A Show Cause Notice was issued in the said case, after which detailed replies were submitted to the GST department. However the same were not fully considered by the GST department and final order was issued in form DRC07 dated 27-04-2024. We have gone for appeal to the Appellate authority against the Order issued.
Area-II	Goods and Services Tax	The said order contains issues such as : Under declaration of output tax, Tax Liability on Other Revenue, Scrutiny of ITC reversals on the basis of comparison between ITC reversed in table 4(B) of GSTR-3B and ITC reversed in table 7(I) of GSTR-9, Blocked Credit under section 17(5), ITC short reversed under Rule 42 and 43 of CGST Rules, etc	9.16	FY 19-20	Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Appellate Authority, Gujarat Ghatak 7 (Ahmedabad):Range - 2:Division - 1:Gujarat	A Show Cause Notice was issued in the said case, after which detailed replies were submitted to the GST department. However the same were not fully considered by the GST department and final order was issued in form DRC07 dated 31-08-2024. We have gone for appeal to the Appellate authority against the Order issued.

CO/Area	Name of the Statute	Nature of the Dues	Amount (Rs. in crores)	Period to which the amount relates	Forum where dispute is pending	Status of Dispute
Area-II	Goods and Services Tax	The said order contains issues such as : Turnover Mismatch, Tax implications on the other revenue as per Balance Sheet, ITC claimed in GSTR 3B is in excess to the ITC available, Credit Notes/ Supplies Reduced through amendments, etc	8.80	FY 20-21	Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Appellate Authority, Gujarat Ghatak 7 (Ahmedabad):Range - 2:Division - 1:Gujarat	A Show Cause Notice was issued in the said case, after which detailed replies were submitted to the GST department. Detailed explanations were also provided during the Personal hearing. However the same were not fully considered by the GST department and final order was issued in form DRC07 dated 27-02-2025. We have gone for appeal to the Appellate authority against the Order issued.
Area-II	Goods and Services Tax	The said order contains issues such as: Excess availment of ITC, Short payment of tax, when compared with outward tax liability declared in GSTR-9 and outward supply reported in GSTR-3B, availment of Inadmissible ITC, reversal of ITC.	0.46	FY 21-22	Appellate Authority, Additional/Joint Commissioner (Appeals), CGST & Central Excise, Indore.	A Show cause notice for FY 2021-22 was received. Post which, a final order in form DRC-07 has been issued by the department on 30-12-2025. We have filed an appeal before the appellate authority for the issues raised.
Area-II	Goods and Services Tax	The said order contains issues such as :	1.30	FY 21-22	Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Appellate Authority, Gujarat Ghatak 7 (Ahmedabad): Range- 2:Division - 1:Gujarat	A Show cause notice for FY 2021-22 was issued on Gujarat State of CONCOR. Post which, a final order in form DRC07 has been issued on 2012-2025. We have gone for appeal to Appellate authority for the issues raised.
		(i) Under-declaration of Exempted/Nil Rated/ Non-GST outward Supply of GSTR-3B with higher of the GSTR-1/GSTR-9/ GSTR-9C
		(ii) Short Payment of tax on liabilities
		(iii) Short Payment of tax on Reconciliation of Liabilities between GSTR-01, GSTR-3B & GSTR-9 .
		(iv) Excess ITC availed / utilised on B2B supplies: (All Other ITC)
		(v) Short reversal of ITC under Section 17 (2) read with Rule 42 amounting.
Area-II	Goods and Services Tax	The incident involving JSW MG Motor India Pvt. Ltd., Halol, where the company had issued a transport order for last-mile delivery through In Time Cargo. A vehicle (registration number MH06BD1354), carrying an import container (MSDU8818903) for JSW MG Motor, was stopped by the Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), Enforcement, Vadodara for transporting goods without an e-way bill.	0.10	FY 21-22	State tax Officer, Vadodara, Gujarat	The incident involving JSW MG Motor India Pvt. Ltd., Halol, where the company had issued a transport order for last-mile delivery through In Time Cargo. A vehicle (registration number MH06BD1354), carrying an import container (MSDU8818903) for JSW MG Motor, was stopped by the Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), Enforcement, Vadodara for transporting goods without an e-way bill. We have gone for appeal to Appellate authority for the issues raised.
Area-III	Goods and Services Tax	Excess and Irregular availment of GST ITC	0.38	FY 202122	Andhra Pradesh Appellate Authority	CONCOR has filed the appeal on 23-02-2026, and awaiting for the first hearing date post filing before the Commissioner.

CO/Area	Name of the Statute	Nature of the Dues	Amount (Rs. in crores)	Period to which the amount relates	Forum where dispute is pending	Status of Dispute
Area-III	Goods and Services Tax	The matter pertains to the following: 1. ITC on Repair & Maintenance, and 2. GST on Other Miscellaneous Income.	0.76	FY 201920 to FY 202324	Telangana Appellate Authority	CONCOR has filed the appeal on 23-02-2026, and the first hearing post filing was attended virtually before the Commissioner on 27-022026. Appellate Authority has passed the order against CONCOR for 2 points i.e., ITC on R&M and GST on Other Income. Further Appeal to GSTAT is under process.
Area-III	Goods and Services Tax	The said order contains issues such as: i) Excess ITC availed in GSTR-3B ii) Non-Payment of GST under RCM iii) GST on Unbilled revenue	1.80	FY 201920	Karnataka Appellate Authority	Reply submitted and personal hearing attended on 19.06.2024, 28.06.2024, 10.07.2024 & 22.07.2024 for clarification and other documents demanded by GST department. After that department informed that case will be further proceed based on grounds and clarification submitted by CONCOR. On 30.08.2024 department served a demand order. Appeal is filed against demand order.
Area-IV	Goods and Services Tax	Office of the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), GST & CX, Burmamines Ranges, Jamshedpur	0	FY 202021	Office of the Commissioner , CGST & Central Excise (Appeal), Ranchi	A Show Cause Notice was issued in the said case, after which detailed replies were submitted to the GST department. However the same were not fully considered by the GST department and DRC-07 Demand Order was issued (Section 73) on 24-02-2025 for the FY 2020-21. Appeal against the Order of Superintendent was filed on 22/05/2025. Date of Hearing was 10.09.2025. Hearing Attended and Matter explained well to the Commissioner Appeals. Appeal was decided against CONCOR via order dated 25.02.2026. CONCOR have paid the amount of Demand in the month of April 2026.

Annexure B to the Independent Auditors Report

Referred to Paragraph 2 under the heading of Report on other Legal and Regulatory Requirements of our Report of even date. According to the information and explanations given to us we report as under:

SN Areas Examined	Observations/Findings	Impact on Financial Statement
1 Assess the fair valuation of all the investments, both quoted and unquoted, made directly by the Company or through Trusts, for Post retirement benefits of the employees. This includes verifying valuation methodologies, ensuring consistency with Ind AS and reviewing supporting documentation. The auditor shall provide a brief note on the valuation approach, its reasonability, and compliance with applicable regulations, reporting any material deviations or misstatements.	The investments relating to Post retirement employee benefits are made by the Trust (Gratuity Fund, Provident Fund, Post Retirement Medical Scheme and Superannuation Pension), which are established by CONCOR. In case of Superannuation Pension Trust, the funds are managed under group policy arrangements with Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and the trust/company does not undertake any independent valuation of the underlying investment. Therefore, no separate valuation note is required as the investments are managed by LIC. However, in respect of other trusts, the fair valuation of investments relating to Post-retirement benefits is conducted by the Company through an independent registered valuer. This process encompasses a rigorous review of valuation methodologies, verification of supporting documentation, and assurance of strict compliance with Ind AS frameworks. In accordance with Ind AS 113 (Fair Value Measurement);	Nil
	For Government Bonds and Securities, quoted securities are valued based on prevailing market yields, whereas unquoted securities are valued using the yield curve methodology sourced from RBI/ FIMMDA yield curve for GOI securities on 31-03-2026.
	For Mutual Fund Investments, Debt Mutual Funds are valued based on NAVs as per fund house disclosures on 31-03-2026 (AMFI data), Equity mutual funds based on published NAVs as per SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations. No material deviations or misstatement was identified.
2 Whether the company has a system in place to process all the accounting transaction through IT systemRs If yes, whether review of this system and controls that are significant to the Companies financial reporting process as well as cyber security has been done by Information Security Auditing Organization empanelled by Cert-In at a minimum frequency of once in a year and material discrepancies found, if any, have been suitably reportedRs The implications of processing of accounting transactions outside IT system on the integrity of the accounts along with the financial implications may also be reported.	The Company has a system in place to process all the accounting transactions through IT system i.e. Oracle e-business suite. The operational entries of the company like revenue, customer ledger account, pre deposits accounts etc. have been recorded in a separate IT system (viz. DTMS, ETMS and CCLS) other than financial reporting IT system (viz. Oracle e-business suite). Further, payroll of the Company is maintained through HRMS system, payment to vendors/contractors bills is done in e-billing module and inventory of the Company is maintained through Maximo. Based on the audit procedure carried out and as per the information and explanations given to us, no accounting transactions have been processed/carried outside the IT system.	Nil
	Further, it has been informed to us that an audit of Information security management system has been conducted by STQC, an attached office under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), under Government of India.
	As per Management, the audit and further certification can be done from STQC or a Cert-in empanelled vendor. Once audit is conducted from STQC, there is no further requirement of getting audit done from Cert-in empanelled vendor. Both Cert-in and STQC are critical government bodies in India under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY).
	The STQC after conducting audit has issued ISMS certificate with validity upto 27-01-2025. The agency conducted 1 st ISMS surveillance audit from 13.02.2026 to 17.02.2026 and allowed continuation of its certification till Jan,2028. Accordingly, there are no implications on the integrity of the accounts.
3 Whether funds (grants/subsidy etc.) received/ receivable for specific schemes from Central/ State Government or its agencies were properly accounted for/utilized as per its term and conditionsRs Whether accounting of interest earned on grants received has been done as per terms and conditions of the Grant. List the cases of deviation.	Based on the information and explanation furnished to us, the Company has not received (grant/subsidy etc.) towards any specific scheme from Central/State Government or its agencies during the financial year 2025-26.	Nil

SN Areas Examined	Observations/Findings	Impact on Financial Statement
4 Whether the Company has identified the key Risk areasRs If yes, whether the Company has formulated any Risk Management Policy to mitigate these risksRs If yes, (a) whether the Risk Management Policy has been formulated considering global best practicesRs (b) whether the Company has identified its data assets and whether it has been valued appropriatelyRs	The company has identified the key Risk areas and has formulated a Risk management policy to mitigate these risks.	Nil
	(a)The Company has an elaborate Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework in place. As a part of implementation of the ERM framework and in terms of SEBI (Listing Obligations & Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, the Company has in place a Board level Risk Management Committee (RMC) which reports to the Board about the risk elements, their mitigation plans, etc. at regular intervals.
	(b)The company has not identified any customer data for commercial use and consequently these data assets are not subject to valuation.
5 Whether the Company is complying with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, and other applicable rules and regulations of SEBI, Department of Investment and Public Asset Management, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Department of Public Enterprises, Reserve Bank of India, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, CERT-IN, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and National Payments Corporation of India wherever	Based on the information and explanations given to us and audit procedures carried out by us, the company is complying with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, and other applicable rules and regulations of SEBI, Department of Investment and Public Asset Management, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Department of Public Enterprises, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, CERT-In, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and National Payments Corporation of India wherever applicable and RBI regulations is not applicable to the Company not being NBFC except as mentioned below:	Nil
applicableRs If not, the cases of deviation may be highlighted	The Company have three Independent Directors on its Board, which is not in compliance with the requirements of Section 149(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 and relevant provisions of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015

	For Hem Sandeep & Co.
	Chartered Accountants
	FRN:009907N
	CA. Priyank Varshney
	Partner
Place: Delhi	M. No. 421308
Date: 25 th May 2026	UDIN: 26421308GIWZTE8909

Annexure - C to the Independent Auditors Report

Referred to Paragraph - 3(f) under the heading of Report on other Legal and Regulatory Requirements our Report of even date

Report on the Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act)

We have audited the Internal Financial Control over financial reporting of CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED

(the Company) as on 31 st March, 2026 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Managements Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

The Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to respective companys policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.

Auditors Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the Guidance Note) issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Standards on Auditing prescribed under Section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects. Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditors judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the internal financial controls system over financial reporting of the Company.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

A companys internal financial controls over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys Internal financial controls over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail ,accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and 299(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

Because of the inherent limitations of Internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that internal financial controls over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over

financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at 31 st March, 2026, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

	For Hem Sandeep & Co.
	Chartered Accountants
	FRN:009907N
	CA. Priyank Varshney
	Partner
Place: Delhi	M. No. 421308
Date: 25 th May 2026	UDIN: 26421308GIWZTE8909

THINK LOGISTICS, THINK CONCOR