Netvision Web Technologies Ltd Share Price Auditors Report
NETVISION WEB TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
ANNUAL REPORT 2005-2006
AUDITORS REPORT
TO, 
THE MEMBERS OF 
NETVISION WEB TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
1. We have audited the attached Balance sheet of NETVISION WEB TECHNOLOGIES 
LIMITED as at 31st March, 2006 and also the Profit and Loss Account and the 
cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto.  These 
financial  statements are the responsibility of the  Companys  management. 
Our  responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial  statements 
based on our audit.
2.  We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards  generally 
accepted  in  India. Those Standards require that we plan and  perform  the 
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements 
are  free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a  test 
basis,  evidence  supporting the amounts and disclosures in  the  financial 
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used 
and  significant  estimate made by managements, as well as  evaluating  the 
overall  financial  statement  presentation.  We  believe  that  our  audit 
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
3.  As required by the Companies (Auditors report) Order, 2003  issued  by 
the central Government of India in terms of sub Section (4A) of Section 227 
of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the annexure a statements on  the 
matters specified in paragraph 4 of the said Order.
4.  Further  to our comments in the annexure referred to above,  we  report 
that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best 
of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;
(b) In Our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law, have  been 
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books. 
(c)  The Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and the Cash  Flow  Statement 
dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred  to 
in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 to the extent 
applicable  except. The company has not accounted for  retirement  benefits 
arising on account of gratuity payable to employees, the amount of which is 
not  ascertainable.  This is contrary to the Accounting Standard AS  -  15 
Accounting  for Retiring Benefits in the Financial Statement  of  employer 
issued  by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The  effect  of 
this on profit & liability could not be ascertain.
(d) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as 
on  31st  March,  2006 and taken on record by the Board  of  Directors,  we 
report  that none of directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2006  from 
being appointed as a director in terms of Clause (g) of sub Section (I)  of 
Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(e) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to  the 
explanations given to us, the said accounts read with the notes thereon and 
documents  annexed thereto five the information required by  the  Companies 
Act, 1956, in the manner so required, Subject to the remark that:
(i) No provision is made for net amount of fixed deposit of Rs. 386.11 lacs 
with  Kuber  Co-Op.  Bank Ltd. Together with interest of  Rs.  109.17  lacs 
accrued  thereon, reliability of which in our opinion, is doubtful  as  the 
bank has discontinued its operation. AS a result of this Loss for the  year 
are understated by Rs. 495.28 Lacs and reserves are overstated by the  same 
amount.
(ii) No provision is made in the account for liability of Rs. 1.75 lacs  In 
respect of Fringe Benefit Tax.
The effect of (i) & (ii) above is that loss for the year is understated and 
reserved  are overstated by Rs. 497.03 Lacs. Assets are overstated  by  Rs. 
495.88 and liabilities are understated by Rs. 1.75 Lacs.
(iii)  We are unable to form opinion about realisability of investments  of 
Rs.  801.67  lacs  in  shares for the reasons stated in  Note  No.  H  of 
Schedule 19.
Give  a  true and fair view in conformity with  the  accounting  principles 
generally accepted in India:
(a) In the case of Balance Sheet of the state of affairs of the Company  as 
at 31st March, 2006;
(b) In the case of Profit & Loss Account of loss for the year ended on that 
date; and
(c) In case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on 
that date.
                                                For U.M. JINTANWALA & CO.
	                                           CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
PLACE : AHMEDBAD
DATED : 04.09.2006	                                     Sd/-
                                                     Umesh M. Jintanwala
	                                             PROPRIETOR
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT
(Referred to in paragraph (3) of our report of even data)
(i) In respect of its Fixed Assets:
(a) The Company is in the process of preparing fixed asset register showing 
full  particulars  including quantitative details and  situation  of  fixed 
assets.
(b) The fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during 
the  year,  according  to the information and explanation given  to  us  no 
material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(c)  In  our opinion the company has not disused off  substantial  part  of 
fixed assets during the year.
(ii) In respect of its Inventories:
(a)  The  inventory  has been physically verified during the  year  by  the 
management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.
(b) The Procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by  the 
management  are  reasonable  and adequate in relation to the  size  of  the 
Company and the nature n its business;
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no  material 
discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
(iii)  In respect of Loans, secured or unsecured, granted or taken  by  the 
company,  to  or  from companies, firms or other  parties  covered  in  the 
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, according 
to the information and explanations given to us:
(a)  The Company has not granted loans, secured or unsecured, to  companies 
covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies  Act, 
1956. Hence clause iii (a) to (d) are not applicable.
(b)  The  company  has taken loans from directors listed  in  the  register 
maintained  under  Section  301 of The Companies  Act,  1956.  The  Maximum 
balance  involved during the period 37542089/- and year end balance is  Rs. 
35892897/-.
(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations  given 
to  us,  the  rate  of interest wherever applicable  and  other  terms  and 
conditions  of  the loans obtained are not prime facie prejudicial  to  the 
interest to the company.
(d) In respect of loans taken by the company, there are no overdue amounts.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given 
to us, there are adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the 
size  of  the Company and the nature of its business for  the  purchase  of 
inventory  and  fixed assets and with regard to sale of goods.  During  the 
course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct 
major weaknesses in internal control.
(v)  In respect of transactions covered under Section 301 of the  Companies 
Act, 1956:
(a)  The transactions that need to be entered in the register in  pursuance 
of sections 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.
(b)   None  of the said transaction are exceeding the value  of  five  lacs 
rupees.
(vi)  The  Company  has not accepted deposits from the  public  within  the 
meaning of Section 58A and Section 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 and  the 
Rules framed there under. We are informed that no Order has been passed  by 
the  Company Law Boards or National Company Law Boards or Reserve  Bank  of 
India or any court or other Tribunal.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company did not have formal internal audit system 
during the year. However its internal checks are adequate.
(viii)  The Central Government has not prescribed for maintenance  of  cost 
records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956.
(ix)  (a) In our opinion and according to the information  and  explanation 
given  to  us,  the  company has  been  regular  in  depositing  undisputed 
statutory  dues  with the appropriate authorities in respect  of  provident 
fund,   employees  state  insurance,  income-tax,  wealth  tax,   investor 
Education and Protection fund and other material statutory dues  applicable 
to  it, except professional tax. Further since the Central  Government  has 
till date not prescribed the amount of cess payable u/s 441 A of  Companies 
Act,  1956,  we  are not in a position to comment upon  the  regularity  of 
otherwise of the Company in deposition the same.
i. According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed 
amounts payable in customs duty, excise duty, and cess were in arrears,  as 
at  31st March 2006 for a period of more than six month for the  date  they 
became  payable  except for in the case of professional  tax,  Rs.  27813/- 
which outstanding for more than six months as at 31st March, 2006.
ii. According to the information and explanations given to us, there ate no 
dues  of  income tax, wealth tax, sales tax, excise duty, custom  duty  and 
cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.
(x)  The  Company has accumulated losses as at Match 31, 2006 and  has  not 
incurred  cash  losses during the year of during  the  immediate  preceding 
financial Year.
(xi)  The Company has not defaulted in repayments of any dues to  Financial 
Institution of Banks or debenture holders except amount of overdraft of Rs. 
113.89 Lac due to Kuber Co-op. Bank Ltd (See Note No. `g in Schedule (19).
(xii)  The  Company  has not granted loans and advances  on  the  basis  of 
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii)  The  company  is nod dealing in or trading  in  shares  securities, 
debenture and other Investment.
(xiv) According to the information and explanation given to us, the company 
has  not  provided  guarantees for loans taken by  others  from  banks  and 
financial institutions.
(xv)  In our opinion, the term loans have been applied for the purpose  for 
which they were raised.
(xvi) According to records examined by and the information and explanations 
given  to  us, on an overall basis, funds raised on short-term  basis  have 
not, prime facie, been used during the year for long term investments.
(xvii) During the year the Company has not made any preferential  allotment 
of shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under 
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xviii) There are not debentures issued and outstanding during the year.
(xix) During the year, the Company has not raised money by public issue(s).
(xx)  To  the  best  of our knowledge and  belief,  and  according  to  the 
information and explanation given to us, no fraud on or by the Company  was 
noticed or reported during the year.
(xxi) The nature of the Companys activities is such that the  requirements 
of clauses (xiii) or paragraph 4 of the Order are not applicable.
                                                For U.M. JINTANWALA & CO.
	                                           CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
PLACE : AHMEDBAD
DATED : 04.09.2006	                                     Sd/-
                                                     Umesh M. Jintanwala
	                                             PROPRIETOR