Bellary Steels & Alloys Ltd liquidated Share Price Auditors Report
BELLARY STEELS AND ALLOYS LIMITED
ANNUAL REPORT 2008-2009
AUDITORS REPORT
To
The Members,
M/s. Bellary Steels and Alloys Limited., 
S. 10/11,Anantapur Road, 
BELLARY-583 101
1.  We  have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/s. Bellary  Steels  &
Alloys Limited, as at 31st March 2009; the Profit & Loss Account; and  the
Cash  Flow Statement for the year ended as on that date, annexed  thereto.
These  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of  the  companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
2.  We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted  in  India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform  the
audit   to   obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the  financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
on  a test basis, evidences supporting the amounts and disclosures in  the
financial  statements.  An  audit also includes assessing  the  accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by the management, as  well
as  evaluating the overall financial statements presentation.  We  believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
3.  As  required  by  the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,  2003,  duly
amended  by  the  DCA  notification GSR 766(E) dated 25th  November  2004,
(hereinafter  to  be  referred to as the Order) issued  by  the  Central
Government  of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section  227  of  the
Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters
specified  in  paragraphs  4  and  5 of the  said  Order,  to  the  extent
applicable.
4.  Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above,  we  report
that:
i) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best
of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;
ii)  In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have  been
kept  by  the company so far as it appears from our examination  of  those
books;
iii)  The  Balance  Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash  Flow  Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with books of account;
iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement  dealt  with  by  this report comply with  Accounting  Standards
referred to in sub section (3C) of section 211 of the companies Act  1956,
except as stated in Notes on accounts No. 20,26 and 27.
v)  On the basis of written representations received from the directors as
on  31st  March  2009 and taken on record by the Board  of  Directors,  we
report that none of the directors are disqualified as on 31st March  2009,
from being appointed as directors in terms of clause (g) of Sub-Section(1) 
of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
vi)  In  the year 2002-03, the company has created Deferred Tax  Asset  in
pursuance of AS-22, Accounting for taxes on Income amounting to Rs 85.50
crores.  As the virtual certainty does not exist to substantiate that  the
company would generate sufficient taxable income in future, we are of  the
view that the continuation of deferred tax asset shall be discontinued  by
the company.
vii)  Subject  to  the  above, in our opinion  and  to  the  best  of  our
information  and  according to the explanations  given  to  us,  the  said
accounts  read with significant accounting policies and notes to accounts,
give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so
required  and give a true and fair view in conformity with the  accounting
principles generally accepted in India;
a. In the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as
at 31st March 2009;
b.  In the case of Profit and Loss Account, of the loss for the year ended
on that date; and
c.  In  the  case of Cash flow Statement, of the Cash Flows for  the  year
ended on that date.
                                         For Manohar Chowdhry & Associates
                                                     Chartered Accountants
                          
                                                   (CA. ASHOK KUMAR DODDI)
Place: Bangalore                                                   Partner
Date : 31st August, 2009                                    M. NO.: 217909
THE  ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH-3 OF OUR REPORT TO THE  MEMBERS  OF
M/S.  BELLARY STEELS AND ALLOYS LIMITED, BELLARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 31ST
MARCH 2009.
WE REPORT THAT:
1.  a)  The  Company  has  maintained  records  showing  full  particulars
including  quantitative  details and situation of Fixed  Assets.  However,
item-wise value in respect of assets other than land and buildings are not
available  since the assets acquired are added to the block value  of  the
assets.
b)  Verification of fixed assets is being conducted in a phased manner  by
the  management designed to cover all assets over a period of three years,
which  in  our  opinion is reasonable having regard to  the  size  of  the
Company  and  the  nature  of assets. The discrepancies  noticed  on  such
verification were not material and have been properly dealt  with  in  the
books of account.
c)  Some  of  the  fixed assets have been disposed  of  during  the  year.
However,  in our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern  is
not affected.
2.  a)  The  inventory of the Company (excluding consignment  stocks  with
third  parties) has been physically verified by the management during  the
year  according to a phased manner normally so designed that each material
item  is  physically verified at least once in a year and at more frequent
intervals in appropriate cases. We are given to understand that there  was
no consignment stock lying with the third party at the end of the year. In
our opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable.
b)  The  procedures of physical verification of Inventory followed by  the
management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of  company
and nature of its business.
c)   The   company  is  maintaining  proper  records  of  inventory.   The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and book
records were not material and accordingly dealt in the books.
3.  a)  According  to the information and explanation  given  to  us,  the
company has, during the year, not granted any secured or un secured  loans
to  companies,  firms or other parties covered in the register  maintained
under section 301 of the companies Act 1956. Accordingly paragraph 4 (iii)
(a), (b),(c),(d) of the order, are not applicable.
e)  The  company has taken interest free unsecured loans from the  parties
covered  in register maintained u/s. 301 of the Companies Act. The details
of which are mentioned here below:
Name of the Maximum  amount  due  at  any Balance  due as at the  end
Directors/ Parties time during the year          of the financial year
                   Amount (Rs.)                  Amount (Rs.)
Mr. S. Madhava          29,49,33,086                  29,45,85,496
Smt. S. Parvathi         1,07,50,000                   1,07,50,000
Bellary Steel               8,89,256                      7,83,596
Rolling Mill
f)  As  we  have not been provided with the terms and conditions  of  loan
agreement, we are unable to comment on whether the terms and conditions of
the said loans are prejudicial to the interest of the company.
g)  The  company has not been regular in payment of principal  portion  of
loan taken from the parties referred above.
4. In  our opinion and according to the information and explanations given
to us there are adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the
size of the company and nature of its business with regard to purchase  of
inventory,  fixed  assets and for sale of goods and services.  During  the
course  of  our  audit,  we have not observed any  continuing  failure  to
correct major weaknesses in Internal Controls.
5. According to the information and explanation given to us, we are of the
opinion  that  the transactions that need to be entered  in  the  register
maintained u/s. 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered.
6.  The  Company has not accepted any deposits from the public during  the
year.  Consequently,  the provisions of section 58A,  58AA  or  any  other
relevant   provisions  of  the  companies  Act,  1956  and  the  companies
(Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 are not applicable to the company.
7.  The  Company  has  an Internal Audit system on a  quarterly  reporting
basis. However, considering the size of the company and the nature of  its
business in our opinion, the same needs to be done on monthly basis.
8.  We  have  broadly reviewed the books of account relating to materials,
labour  and other items of cost maintained by the company pursuant to  the
Rules  made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost  records
under  sec.  209  (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and  we  are  of  the
opinion  that  prima facie the prescribed accounts and records  have  been
made  and maintained. We have not, however made a detailed examination  of
the same.
9.  a) According to the records of the company, undisputed statutory  dues
including  provident fund, employees state insurance,  investor  education
and  protection  fund,  income tax, sales tax, wealth  tax,  service  tax,
customs  duty,  excise duty and other statutory dues have  been  generally
regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities.
Further,  since  the Central Government has till date not  prescribed  the
amount  of cess payable under section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956,  we
are  not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of  the
Company in depositing the same.
b)  According to the information and explanations given to us,  there  are
dues of Sales Tax, Income Tax, Excise Duty, Cess, which are disputed,  and
the forums where the disputes are pending is mentioned here below.
Name of the		 Maximum	               Balance due
Directors/		 amount due	               as at the end
Parties		         at any time	               of the
	                 during the year	       financial year
	                 Amount (Rs.)	               Amount (Rs.)
Mr. S. Madhava		   29,49,33,086	               29,45,85,496
Smt. S. Parvathi	    1,07,50,000	                1,07,50,000
Bellary Steel                  8,89,256 	           7,83,596
Rolling Mills		
b)  According  to the information and explanations given to us,  there are 
dues  of Sales Tax, Income Tax, Excise Duty, Cess, which are disputed, and 
the forums where the disputes are pending is mentioned here below.
Name of the  Nature of          Amount of    Period to         Forum where 
Statute      dues   	          Tax due    which the	dispute is pending
			            (Rs.)    amount 
                                             Relates
Central	     Disputed	         4,77,292    1991-92	      Appeal filed
Sales	     Turnover		             to	          before Karnataka
Tax			                     1995-96	         Appellate 
                                                                  Tribunal
KST &	     Disputed	     10,51,83,487    1996-97	     Supreme Court 
Central	     Turnover		             From Appeal    filed with the
Sales Tax		                     1997-98 to       Tribunal and  
                                             2000-01	     Commissioner.
             Disputed 
Entry Tax    Turnover	           24,464    1994-95	         Appellate 
                                                                 Tribunal, 
                                                                Bangalore.
Entry Tax    Disputed            6,50,804    1995-96	         Appellate 
             Turnover                                            Tribunal, 
                                                                Bangalore.
             
Entry Tax    Disputed            7,42,345    1996-97	         Appellate 
             Turnover	                                         Tribunal, 
                                                                Bangalore.
Income Tax   U/s 234A, 	      2,17,42,739    A.Y.1997-98        Income Tax 
	     234B, 234 C,                                        Appellate
             Additional                                           Tribunal
             Tax U/s 154,                                        Bangalore
             disallowance                             
	     of Lease 
             Rentals and
	     Interest on 
             Lease
	     Rentals
Sales Tax    Disputed           10,40,000    1990-91	           Special 
             Turnover	                                         Appellate 
                                                                  Tribunal 
                                                                   Chennai
Central      MODVAT           2,18,14,814    2002-03	           CESTAT, 
Excise	     disallowed	                                           Chennai
Central      MODVAT           1,43,47,222	1998	            CESTAT 
Excise	     disallowed	                                         Bangalore
Central      MODVAT              2,74,280    Sep 93	            CEGAT,
Excise	     disallowed	                                         Bangalore
Central      MODVAT             14,79,180    April 02	     CEGAT,Chennai
Excise	     disallowed	
Central      MODVAT              7,19,511    Sep 02	      Commissioner  
Excise	     disallowed	                                        (Appeals);
                                                                 Mangalore
Central      MODVAT           2,18,14,814    2002-03	       CE, Belgaum
Excise	     disallowed	                                            CESTAT
Central      Stock            6,18,71,454    2000-01	   Commissioner of 
Excise	     Variation	                                       CE, Belgaum
Central      CENVAT             28,26,587    2001-02	   CESTAT,Chennai.
Excise	     Utilization		
Central      Stock            7,46,24,640    2002	  CESTAT,Bangalore
Excise	     Variation		
Central      ISP cenvat      10,21,10,684    2008-09	            CESTAT 
Excise	     credit		                                 Bangalore
             disallowed
Central      MODVAT             17,37,249    July 02	   Commissioner of 
Central      ISP cenvat      10,21,10,684    2008-09	           CESTAT,
Excise	     utilized in                                         Bangalore
             existing 
             disallowed
10. In our Opinion,the accumulated losses of the company at the end of the 
financial year have eroded the entire net worth of  the company.  Further, 
the  company has incurred cash loss in the financial year  covered by  our 
audit report and the immediately preceding financial year.
       BANKS                                Period of default       Rs. in   
       WORKING CAPITAL LOANS                                          lacs  
1      HDFC                                 7 years 3 months          5452
2      Dhanlakshmi Bank Ltd                 9 years                   6983
3      Central Bank of India                9 years 6 months          5938
4      Indian Bank                          9 years 7 months          3567
5.     LOAN PORTFOLIO TAKEN                                      
       OVER BY ARCIL                                             
       a. State Bank of India               7 years 5 months          8642
       b. ICICI Bank                        8 years 4 months          8247
       c. Punjab National Bank              8 years                   5834
       d. The South Indian Bank Ltd.        8 years 9 months          8821
       e. State Bank of Travancore          7 years 5 months          4369
       f. State Bank of Mysore              8 years 9 months          3306
       g. Dena Bank                         9 years 6 months          3217
       h. Bank of Maharashtra               7 years 10 months         5750
       i. Bharath Overseas Bank             8 years 8 months          4072
       TERM LOANS                                                
1      IDBI 9 years                         1507                 
2      IIBI 9 years                         20                   
       LOAN PORT FOLIO TAKEN                                     
       OVER BY ARCIL                                             
       a. ICICI                             9 years                   1462
       TERM LOANS (ISP)                                          
1      IDBI                                 8 years 6 months         46659
2      IFCI                                 8 years 6 months         26991
3      IIBI                                 8 years 6 months          4987
4      Exim Bank                            6 years 6 months          6703
       LEASE FINANCE                                             
5      Canara Bank                          10 years 3 months         3688
6      KSFC                                 10 years 3 months        10043
       LOAN PORT FOLIO TAKEN                                     
       OVER BY ARCIL                                             
       a. ICICI                             7 years 6 months         34217
       b. State Bank India                  5 years 6 months         24997
       c. Punjab National Bank              5 years 6 months          9786
       d. State Bank of Mysore              6 years 6 months          4684
       e. Dena Bank                         6 years 6 months          9190
       f. Bank of Maharashtra               6 years 6 months          7421
11. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given 
to  us,  the  company  has defaulted in  repayment  of  dues  to financial 
institutions and banks. The details of defaults are as follows:
12. The Company has not granted loans or advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of Shares, Debentures and other Securities.
15.  In  our Opinion, the company is not a chit fund or a nidhi or  mutual
benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii)  of  the
Companies  (Auditors  Report)  Order, 2003  are  not  applicable  to  the
company.
14.  In  our  opinion, the company is not dealing or  trading  in  shares,
Securities, Debentures and other Investments. Accordingly, the  provisions
of  clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are  not
applicable to the company.
15. The company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others.
16.  In our opinion, the company has not raised any term loans during  the
year under audit.
17.  According to the information and explanations given to us and on  the
basis  of  overall  examination of the balance sheet of  the  company,  we
report  that no funds raised on short term basis have been used  for  long
term investment.
18.  According to the information and explanation given to us, during  the
year  under our audit the company has not made any preferential  allotment
of  equity shares to the parties listed in the registered maintained  u/s.
301 of the Companies Act.
19.  According to the information and explanations given to us, during the
year under audit the company has not issued any debentures.
20.  According to the information and explanations given to us, during the
year  under audit, the company has not raised any money by way  of  public
issue.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on
or  by  the company has been noticed or reported during the course of  our
audit.
                                         For Manohar Chowdhry & Associates
                                                     Chartered Accountants
                          
                                                   (CA. ASHOK KUMAR DODDI)
Place: Bangalore                                                   Partner
Date : 31st August, 2009                                    M. NO.: 217909