Nuchem Ltd Share Price Auditors Report
NUCHEM LIMITED
ANNUAL REPORT 2009-2010
AUDITORS REPORT
To, the Members of
Nuchem Limited
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Nuchem Limited as at 31st
March, 2010 and also the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date, annexed thereto.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
2. We have conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
oenerally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 as amended
by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order 2004 (Collectively
the Order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section
227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956 and on the basis of such checks as we
considered appropriate and according to the information and explanations
given to us, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters
specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account, as required by law, have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement, dealt with by this report, comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in sub - section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies
Act, 1956 except Accounting Standards AS-13 as explained in Clause 4(g)
below.
(e) The company has defaulted in repayment of principal amount of fixed
deposits and payment of interest thereon in respect of deposits pertaining
to earlier years. (Reference is drawn to our comments in clause 6 of
Annexure to this report). The company has been legally advised that the
defaults related to the period prior to enactment of section 274(1)(g) of
the Companies Act, 1956 and, therefore, the present directors of the
company do not attract any disqualification under section 274(1)(g) of the
Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly on representation of the company based on
legal opinion taken by it, and written representations received from the
directors of the company, as on 31st March, 2010, none of the directors of
the company is disqualified to act as a director under Section 274(1)(g) of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(f) Refer note no. B - 13 of Schedule 17, the company has accounted for net
deferred tax assets accumulated upto the end of current accounting year of
Rs.1542.49 lacs on timing differences arising on unabsorbed losses,
depreciation and other matters under Income tax law. The company has
incurred losses in the recent past. In view of this, we are unable to
comment on the realisation of such assets against future taxable Income.
(g) There is investment of Rs.204.33 lac in Nuchem Infrastructure Limited,
a subsidiary company. The companys proportionate share in the losses of
subsidiarys accumulated losses is Rs.257.71 lac (Previous year Rs.268.82
lac) as per the latest audited Balance Sheet. Decline in the value of
investment in the subsidiary company has not been provided tor in terms of
Accounting Standard AS-13 Accounting for Investments notified pursuant to
the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006.
We understand that management has been in the process of disinvestment of
subsidiary which includes sale of part of its holding in earlier year. On
the basis of report on valuation of assets of subsidiary done by a
professional firm and based on this valuation, the management having sold
part of its holding in the previous year, the management is of the view
that the companys stake in the subsidiary is fully covered by the value of
its assets.
(h) Reference is drawn to note no. B -6 of Schedule 17, wherein it has been
stated that in the process of financial restructuring continuing from the
initial relief package and modifications thereof, the company entered into
OTS arrangement with most of its term lenders and has already made
payment/s as per terms of sanction. Reliefs thereof have been accounted for
in earlier years.
During the year, the company has further entered into OTS arrangement with
one more Institution and payments are being made in terms of sanction. The
company is yet to make balance payment of Rs. 185.65 lac. In case of this
Institution, relief/s of Rs. 117.57 lac have been considered in earlier
years and Rs. 5.78 lac has been considered in the current year. In case of
default, leading to revoking of OTS, if any, it would lead to increase in
provision for interest for the year of Rs. 120.32 lac, total such
unprovided for liability up to the end of the year would be Rs.465.09 lac,
apart from amounts treated as waived off of Rs.97.07 lac in earlier years.
(i) The company has made disinvestment of 48.96% shareholding of Nuchem
Infrastructure Limited (formerly Nuchem Machine Tools Limited), a
subsidiary company, profit of Rs.2352.00 lac thereof was recognised in the
previous year. The company had received Rs.200 lac against the sale
consideration and realisation of the balance amount of Rs. 2348.00 lac is
due from March 2010 upto September 2012. Overdue amount as on 31.03.2010 is
Rs.254.80 lac. The management is pursuing the matter and in the opinion of
the management, this amount will be realised within the stipulated period.
We have relied on the opinion of management in this regard.
(j) During the year, the company has entered into an agreement to sell in
respect of one of its properties at Faridabad. The agreement is subject to
necessary approvals and clearances, including from the Banks and Financial
institutions, which are yet to be received. Pending the approvals, the sale
transaction resulting in a profit of a Rs. 610.68 Lac has not been
recognised in this year accounts.
5. We further report that, had the observations made by us at clause 4(g)
above been considered, accumulated losses would increase by Rs.204.33 lac
and Investment in subsidiary would reduce by Rs.204.33 lac, the impact of
observation at 4(f) is not determinable at this stage.
6. Subject to above, in our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read with the
Accounting policies and Notes thereon give the information required by the
Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view
in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
i. In the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as
at 31st March, 2010;
ii. In the case of Profit and Loss Account, of the loss for the year ended
on that date; and
iii. In the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
For D.S. Talwar & Co. For S.S. Kothaii Mehta & Co.
Chartered Accountants Chartered Accountants
Firm Regn.No.- 000993N Firm Regn.No.- 000756N
Sd/- V. Talwar Sd/- Arun K. Tulsian
Partner Partner
Membership No. 7542 Membership No. 89907
Place: Faridabad
Dated: 12th November, 2010
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT (Annexure referred to in our report of even
date)
1.a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars,
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets except in
respect of furniture and fixtures as evidenced by the records examined by
us and the information made available to us.
b) The Management has physically verified fixed assets during the period
except furniture and fixtures and office equipments. In our opinion, the
frequency of such verification is reasonable having regard to size of the
company and nature of its assets. Discrepancies noticed on such
verification as compared to book records were not material and have been
properly adjusted in the books of account.
c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year,
except that during the year, the company has entered into an agreement to
sell in respect of one of its properties at Faridabad (refer clause 4(j)
above). This has not affected the going concern assumption.
2.a) The inventory, except material lying with third parties, in transit
and stock of semi finished goods at MDF Division, has been physically
verified by the management during the year. The semi finished stock of MDF
Division is physically verified at an interval of two years as per policy.
In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.
b) The procedures for the physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are , in our opinion, reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and nature of its business.
c) In our opinion, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory.
The discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as
compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealt
with in the books of account.
3.a) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to
Companies, firms and other parties covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
b) Since there are no such loans, comments on conditions regarding
repayment of the principal amount, interest thereon and overdue amounts are
not applicable.
c) The Company has taken unsecured interest free loan of Rs 1.40 Lac
(Maximum amount outstanding during the year and year end balance Rs 1.40
Lac) from a director and unsecured loan of Rs 468.83 lac(Maximum amount
outstanding during the year and year end balance Rs 468.83 Lac) from its
subsidiary company. The Company has not taken any other loan, secured or
unsecured, from companies, firms and other parties covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
d) The rate of interest where provided and other terms and conditions are,
prima facie, not prejudicial to the interest of the company.
e) Payment of principal amount and interest has not become due as on 31st
March 2010 in respect of loan from the subsidiary and in other case, the
loan is repayable on demand and no demand has been received.
f) There is no overdue amount of principal or interest.
4. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations given
to us during the course of audit, there are adequate internal control
systems commensurate with size of the Company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the
sale of goods and services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the
books and records of the company, carried out in accordance with the
generally accepted auditing practices in India, we have neither come across
nor have we been informed of any instance of major weaknesses in the
aforesaid internal control systems.
5.a) Based upon the audit procedures applied by us and according to the
information and explanations given to us by management, the particulars of
contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Act have been
entered in the register required to be maintained under that Section.
b) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations given
to us, each of these transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements required to be entered in the register maintained under
Section 301 of the Act and exceeding the value of Rs. five lac in respect
of each party during the year, has been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time, where
such market prices are available.
6. In respect of deposits accepted from public in earlier years in terms of
section 58-A of the Companies Act, 1956 and Rules framed thereunder, the
company has not been able to make payments towards principal and interest
thereon in accordance with the Order dated 20.05.1997 of the Honble
Company Law Board (CLB). The matter is before the Court at the instance of
Registrar of Companies in view of non compliance of earlier Order dated
20.05.1997. In view of the liquidity position, the Company approached
Honble Company Law Board and had been sanctioned revised Order dated
10.06.2005, effective 01.10.2005 envisaging payments over a period of 4
years. In view of continuing losses and its consequent effect on its
liquidity position, the company has not been able to make payments as
stipulated, the company has re approached Honble Company Law Board seeking
more time for making payment of balance amounts as on 30.09.09. As
informed, the companys request is under consideration. The amounts
including interest outstanding as on 31.03.2010 is Rs. 222.47 tac.
7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate
with the size and nature of its business.
8. The Central Government has prescribed maintenance of cost records under
section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of two of the
products of the company namely Formaldehyde and Brooksite . We are of the
opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed records have been made and
maintained. We are, however, not required to carry out a detailed
examination of the same.
9.a) According to the records of the company, undisputed statutory dues
including Employees Provident fund, Investor Education and Protection fund,
Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax, Wealth-tax, Custom Duty,
Excise Duty, Service Tax, Cess and other statutory dues, as applicable,
have not been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities during
the year. There are arrears of Rs.51.52 lac, Rs.14.65 lac ,Rs.0.58 lac,
Rs.6.99 lac, Rs.2.01 lac and Rs.4.70 lac in respect of Income tax.FBT, VAT,
CST, ESI and Service Tax respectively payable as at the end of the year for
a period of more than six months from the date they became payable. b)
According to the information and explanations given to us and as per the
books and records examined by us, there are no dues of income tax, custom
duty, excise duty, wealth tax, cess and service tax which have not been
deposited on account of any dispute, except the following in respect of
disputed sales tax/lncometax alongwith the forum where dispute is pending:
Name of the Nature of Amount Period to Forum where dispute
Statute dues (Rs. in which the is pending
lacs) amount
relates
Delhi Sales Sales Tax 14.58 1984-85 Appellate Tribunal at
Tax Act 1975 Delhi.
12.08 1985-86 - do -
30.17 1986-87 - do -
0.65 1993-94 Deputy Commissioner,(A)
Delhi
Haryana Value VAT 129.79 2006-07 Joint ETC(A) Faridabad
Added Tax
Central Sales CST 5.00 1993-94 Deputy Commissioner, (A)
Tax Act 1956 Delhi
Central CST 0.50 1998-99 Appellate Tribunal at
Sales Tax Chandigarh.
3.98 2003-04 Joint ETC(A) Faridabad.
5.37 2005-06 -do-
115.17 2006-07 -do-
Trade Tax 0.02 1995-96 The Trade Tax Officer
NOIDA
0.09 1996-97 -do-
0.12 1997-98 -do-
0.03 2001-02 -do-
Income Tax 15.44 1994-95 CIT(A), FBD
3.28 1997-98 -do-
0.33 2006-07 -do-
0.77 2007-08 -do-
0.76 2008-09 -do-
10. The accumulated losses of the company as at the end of current
financial year have exceeded fifty percent of its net worth. The company
has incurred cash losses during the current accounting year. There were no
cash losses during immediately preceding accounting period.
11. During the year, the company has defaulted in repayment of dues to
banks. The total amount of default as on 31.03.2010 has been Rs. 361.23
lac, with date of earliest default in February 2009.The defaults have
continued upto the close of the accounting year.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of
pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The Company does not fall within the category of Chit fund / Nidhi /
Mutual Benefit fund / Society and hence the related reporting requirements
of the Order are not applicable.
14. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company
is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other
investments and hence the related reporting requirements of the Order are
not applicable.
15. TheXompany has given corporate guarantee of Rs.112.66 lac to a bank
against the working capital facilities taken by a company. The terms and
conditions of such guarantee do not, prima facie, appear to be prejudicial
to the interest of the company.
16. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given
to us, the term loans raised during the year by the Company have been
applied for the purpose for which the said loans were obtained, where such
end use has been stipulated by the lenders.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and as per
the books and records examined by us, as on the date of balance sheet, the
funds raised by the Company on short term basis have been applied for
payment of long term dues under OTS, to the extent of Rs. 1938.93 Lac.
18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares, during
the year, to parties and Companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
19. The company does not have any debentures outstanding as at the year
end.
20. The Company has not raised any money by way of public issues during the
year.
21. During the course of our examination of the books and records of the
Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing
practices in India, we have neither come across any instance of fraud on or
by the Company, noticed and reported during the year, nor have we been
informed of such case by the management.
For D.S. Talwar & Co. For S.S. Kothaii Mehta & Co.
Chartered Accountants Chartered Accountants
Firm Regn.No.- 000993N Firm Regn.No.- 000756N
Sd/- V. Talwar Sd/- Arun K. Tulsian
Partner Partner
Membership No. 7542 Membership No. 89907
Place: Faridabad
Dated: 12th November, 2010