TO THE MEMBERS OF
AHLUWALIA CONTRACTS (INDIA) LIMITED
REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF STANDALONE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying standalone financial Statements of Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Limited (the Company), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2024, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including other comprehensive income), the Statement of Cash Flow, the Statement of Changes in Equity, Notes to the Financial Statements for the year ended on that date, and a summary of the material accounting policies and other explanatory information (hereinafter referred to as the standalone financial statements).
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended, ("IND AS") and other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2024, the profit and total comprehensive income, changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the Auditors Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the standalone financial statements under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the ICAIs Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on the standalone financial statements.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the standalone financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the standalone Ind AS financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. We have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.
S. No. | Key Audit Matters |
Auditors Response |
1 | Revenue recognition for long term construction contracts |
Our audit procedures include the following: |
The Companys significant portion of business is undertaken through long term construction contracts. Revenue from these contracts is recognized over a period of time in accordance with the requirements of Ind AS 115, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Due to the nature of the contracts, revenue recognition involves usage of percentage of completion method which is determined based on output method such as surveys of performance completed to date, appraisal of results achieved, milestones reached, units produced or units delivered which involves significant judgements, identification of contractual obligations and the Companys rights to receive payments for performance completed till date, changes in scope and consequential revised contract price and recognition of the liability for loss making contracts. (Note No. 2.3) | Reading the companys revenue recognition accounting policies and assessing compliance with the policies in terms of Ind AS 115. | |
We performed test of controls over revenue recognition with specific focus on determination of progress of completion and recording of costs incurred. | ||
We performed tests of details, on a sample basis, and read the underlying customer contracts and its amendments, if any, key contract terms and milestones etc. for verifying estimation of contract revenue and cost and /or any change in such estimation. | ||
We reviewed the managements evaluation process to recognize revenue over a period of time, status of completion for projects and total cost estimates. | ||
We tested contracts with exceptions including contracts with low or negative margins, contracts with significant changes in planned cost estimates, contracts with significant contract assets and liabilities, and significant overdue net receivable positions for contracts and tested these exceptions with its correlation with the underlying contracts, documents for the triggers during the period. | ||
We tested that the contractual positions and revenue for the year are presented and disclosed in compliance of Ind AS 115 in the Standalone financial statements. |
S. No. | Key Audit Matters |
Auditors Response |
2 | Trade Receivables and Contract Assets |
Our Audit procedures amongst other included the following: |
Trade receivables and Contract Assets amounting to 78107.74 lakhs and 71744.84 lakhs respectively represent approximately 46.88 % of the total assets of the Company as at March 31, 2024. In assessing the recoverability of the aforesaid balance managements judgement involves consideration of aging status, evaluation of litigations and the likelihood of collection based on the terms of the contract. Management estimation is required in the measurement of work completed during the period for recognition of unbilled revenue. We considered this as key audit matter due to the materiality of the amounts and significant estimates and judgements as stated above. | We understood and tested on a sample basis the design and operating effectiveness of management control over the recognition and the recoverability of the trade receivables and contract assets. | |
We performed test of details and tested relevant contracts, documents and subsequent settlements for material trade receivable balances and amounts included in contract assets that are due on performance of future obligations. | ||
We tested the aging of trade receivables at year end. | ||
We performed test of details and tested relevant contracts and documents with specific focus on measurement of work completed during the period for material unbilled revenue balances included in contract asset. | ||
We performed additional procedures, in respect of material over- due trade receivables and long outstanding contract assets, i.e. tested historical payment records and legal advice obtained by the management on litigations from legal experts. | ||
We assessed the allowance for impairment made by management. |
3 | Litigation and Claims & other Contingent Liabilities- |
Our audit procedures amongst others included the following: |
The Company is involved in direct, indirect tax and other litigations that are pending with different statutory authorities. (Refer note 40(i)(a) to the Standalone Financial Statements). | Obtained list of pending litigations as at March 31, 2024 from management. | |
The level of management judgement associated with determining the need for, and the quantum of, provisions for any liabilities is dependent on a number of significant assumptions and assessments which involves interpreting the various applicable rules, regulations, practices and considering precedents in the various jurisdictions. | We analysed the completed assessments for pending cases of similar nature. | |
This matter is considered as a key matter, in view of the uncertainty regarding the outcome of these litigations, the significance of the amounts involved and the subjectivity involved in managements judgement as to whether the amount should be recognized as a provision or only disclosed as contingent liability in the standalone financial statements. | Discussed the matters with the management to understand the possible outcome of these disputes. | |
We have also considered legal precedence and other rulings in evaluating management position on these uncertain tax & other litigations. | ||
Obtained experts opinion in major cases to review the managements assessment of the possible outcome of the disputes relating to direct, indirect tax and other litigations. | ||
Assessed contingent liability disclosure in note 40(i)(a) to the accompanying Standalone financial statements. |
Other Information
The Companys Board of Director is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Management Discussion and Analysis, Boards Report including Annexures to Boards Report, Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report, Corporate Governance and Shareholders Information, but does not include the standalone financial statements and our auditors
report thereon. The above-mentioned report is expected to be made available to us after the date of this auditors report.
Our opinion on the Standalone financial statements does not cover the other information and we will not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the Standalone financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information
identified above when it becomes available and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the Standalone financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
When we read the Annual Report, if we conclude that there is a material misstatement therein, we are required to communicate the matter to those charged with governance.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Standalone Financial Statements
The Companys Board of Director is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements to give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance (including other comprehensive income), cash flows and changes in equity of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards specified in the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 (as amended) under Section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the standalone financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Companys ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
The Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Companys financial reporting process.
Auditors Responsibility for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee
that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these standalone financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:
Materiality is the magnitude of misstatements in the standalone financial statements that, individually or in aggregate, makes it probable that the economic decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable user of the standalone financial statements may be influenced. We consider quantitative materiality and qualitative factors in (i) planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of any identified misstatements in the standalone financial statements.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the standalone financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditors report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
Changes in Equity and the Standalone Statement of Cash Flow dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the relevant books of account.
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the remuneration paid by the Company to its directors during the year is in accordance with the provisions of section 197 of the Act.
Further, during the course of our audit we did not come across any instance of the audit trail feature being tampered with.
As proviso to Rule 3(1) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 is applicable from April 1, 2023, reporting under Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 on preservation of audit trail as per the statutory requirements for record retention is not applicable for the financial year ended March 31, 2024.
For Amod Agrawal & Associates
Chartered Accountants Firm Registration No. 005780N
AMOD AGRAWAL
Partner
Place: New Delhi Membership No.- 084175 Dated: 29-05-2024 UDIN: 24084175BKHZUV9121
ANNEXURE-A TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
(Referred to in paragraph 1 (f) under "Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements" section of our report to the Members of Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Limited of even date)
REPORT ON THE INTERNAL FINANCIAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING UNDER CLAUSE (I) OF SUB- SECTION 3 OF SECTION 143 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 ("THE ACT")
We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Limited ("the Company") as of March 31, 2024 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.
Managements Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls
The Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to the Companys policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the "Guidance Note") and the Standards on Auditing, issued by ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls, both applicable to an audit of Internal Financial Controls and, both issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.
Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over
financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditors judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the standalone financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Companys internal financial controls system over financial reporting.
Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting
A companys internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of standalone financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of standalone financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the standalone financial statements.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting
Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Opinion
In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at March 31, 2024, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial
Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
For Amod Agrawal & Associates
Chartered Accountants Firm Registration No. 005780N
AMOD AGRAWAL
Partner
Place: New Delhi Membership No.- 084175 Dated: 29-05-2024 UDIN: 24084175BKHZUV9121
ANNEXURE-B TO INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
(Referred to in paragraph 2 under "Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements" section of our report to the Members of Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Limited of even date)
of the Company and the nature of its assets. In accordance with the said programme part of the Property, Plant and Equipment have been physically verified by the management during the year. As informed, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
Description of property | Gross carrying value ( In Lakhs) |
Held in the name of |
Whether promoter, director or their relative or employee | Period held- indicate range, where appropriate | Reason for not being held in the name of the company Also indicate if in dispute |
Building 5th & 8th Floor, KB-25, Sector III Bidhurnagar Kolkata |
337.63 |
Lok Nayak Jaiprakash Memorial Committee |
No |
2007-2010 |
The possession and original agreement to sale of the property is in the name of the Company. The Company is in process of to get the title deeds registered with appropriate authority. No dispute. |
In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable and procedures and coverage as followed by management were appropriate. No discrepancies were noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records that were more than 10% in the aggregate of each class of inventory.
of cost records under section 148(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have not carried out detailed examination of such accounts and records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete.
Name of the Statute | Nature of Dues |
Amount ( in lakhs) |
Period to which the amount relates |
Forum where dispute is pending |
Central Excise Act, 1944 | Demand for Excise duty | 319.70 | Mar.11 to Nov.12 | Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Bangalore |
Central Excise Act, 1944 | Demand for Excise duty | 364.31 |
April-12 to Feb.- 2016 |
CESTAT, Allahabad |
Central Excise Act, 1944 | Demand for Excise duty | 236.86 |
April-12 to Feb.- 2016 |
CESTAT, Allahabad |
Commercial Taxes, Jharsuguda | VAT Demand | 61.25 |
19.02.08 to 31.03.12 |
Additional Commissioner, SGST-Jharsuguda (Orissa) |
Goods & Services Tax, Act | GST Demand | 13.15 | 2017-18 | Appellate Tribunal, Delhi |
Goods & Services Tax, Act | GST Demand | 41.40 | 2018-19 | DETC, Gurgaon |
Goods & Services Tax, Act | GST Demand | 33.03 | 2020-21 | Appellate Authority, Mumbai |
Goods & Services Tax, Act | GST Demand | 89.37 | 2021-22 | Appellate Authority, Mumbai |
Goods & Services Tax, Act | GST Demand | 59.65 | 2022-23 | Appellate Authority, Mumbai |
Name of the Statute | Nature of Dues |
Amount ( in lakhs) |
Period to which the amount relates |
Forum where dispute is pending |
Goods & Services Tax, Act | GST Demand | 431.97 | 2017-18 | Appellate Authority, Kolkata |
Goods & Services Tax, Act | GST Demand | 78.22 | 2018-19 | Jt. Commissioner, LTU, WB |
Haryana Value Added Tax | VAT Demand | 239.42 | 2011-12 | PHHC, Chandigarh |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 521.37 | 2007-08 TO 2011-
12 |
CESTAT, DELHI |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 64.82 | 2009-10 to 2011-12 | CESTAT, DELHI |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 721.00 | 2011-12 | CESTAT, DELHI |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 207.55 | 2014-15 TO
30.06.17 |
Appellate Tribunal, Delhi |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 1,201.14 | April-12 to March-13 | CESTAT, DELHI |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 36.49 | 2006-09 | Asst. Commissioner, Jamnagar |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 8.71 | Apr.07 to Feb.08 | Asst. Commissioner, Jamnagar |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 3,309.91 | 2010-11 | CESTAT, CHANDIGARH |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 870.41 | 2005-06/2008-09 | Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 573.60 | 2007-2011 | CESTAT, MUMBAI |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 84.53 | 2006-07 to 2010-11 | Commissioner-CGST-GZB. |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 13.57 | 2013-14 | CESTAT, Allahabad |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 2,804.68 | June-07 to Sep-10 | CESTAT, Allahabad |
Name of the Statute | Nature of Dues |
Amount ( in lakhs) |
Period to which the amount relates |
Forum where dispute is pending |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 31.44 | Mar.12 to Mar.13 | Commissioner Appeal, Noida |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 45.35 | Oct 10 to Feb 12 | CESTAT, Allahabad |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 57.10 | 2016-17 | Adjudication Authority, Kolkata |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 38.54 | 2017-18 | Adjudication Authority, Kolkata |
The Finance Act, 2004 and the Service Tax Rules | Service Tax Demand | 103.48 | Oct.05 to Jan.08 | CESTAT, KOLKATA |
Value Added tax Act, Chandigarh | VAT Demand | 44.71 | 2012-13 | Dy. Comm. (Appeals), Chandigarh |
Value Added Tax Act, DELHI | VAT Demand | 69.88 | 2013-14 | Special Commissioner, DVAT |
Value Added Tax Act, DELHI | VAT Demand | 5.30 | 2014-15 | Special Commissioner, DVAT |
Value Added Tax Act, DELHI | VAT Demand | 16.77 | 2015-16 | Special Commissioner, DVAT |
Value Added Tax Act, DELHI | VAT Demand | 7.49 | 2016-17 | Special Commissioner, DVAT |
Value Added Tax Act, DELHI | VAT Demand | 37.20 | 2017-18 | Special Commissioner, DVAT |
Value Added Tax Act, MH | VAT Demand | 16.43 | 2005-06 | Dy Commissioner (Audit), Mumbai |
Value Added Tax Act, UP | VAT Demand | 4.27 | 2005-06 | Appellate Tribunal, Ghaziabad |
Value Added Tax Act, UP | VAT Demand | 2.67 | 2006-07 | Additional Commissioner (A), Ghaziabad |
Value Added Tax Act, UP | VAT Demand | 59.36 | 2008-09 | Appellate Tribunal, Ghaziabad |
Value Added Tax Act, UP | VAT Demand | 6.84 | Jan.08 to March-08 | Additional Commissioner (A), Ghaziabad |
Value Added Tax Act, WB | VAT Demand | 1.54 | 1997-98 | appellate Tribunal, Kolkata |
Value Added Tax Act, WB | VAT Demand | 3.01 | 1998-99 | Sr. Jt. Commissioner, Kolkata |
Value Added Tax Act, WB | VAT Demand | 0.22 | 2005-06 | Sr. Jt. Commissioner, Kolkata |
Income Tax Act, 1961 | Income Tax Demand | 66.45 | AY 2016-17 | Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals-New Delhi |
Income Tax Act, 1961 | Income Tax Demand | 70.8 | AY 2019-20 | Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals-New Delhi |
Income Tax Act, 1961 | Income Tax Demand | 2.86 | AY 2020-21 | Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals-New Delhi |
Income Tax Act, 1961 | Income Tax Demand | 17.57 | AY 2021-22 | Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals-New Delhi |
Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provision Act,1952 | Provident Fund Demand | 5,457.34 | 2007 to 2009 | Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi and High Court, New Delhi |
Indian Stamp Act | Stamp Duty on Real Estate Project | 57.42 | 1990-91 | Allahabad High Court |
b. According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year. Accordingly, the clause 3 (x)(b) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.
related parties and the details have been disclosed in the standalone financial statements, as required by the applicable accounting standards.
(b) We have considered, the internal audit reports for the year under audit, issued to the Company during the year and till date, in determining the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures.
(b) In our opinion no amount is required to transfer in respect of ongoing projects, to a Special Account within thirty days from the end of the financial year as required under the sub-section (6) of section 135 of the Act.
For Amod Agrawal & Associates
Chartered Accountants Firm Registration No. 005780N
AMOD AGRAWAL
Partner
Place: New Delhi Membership No.- 084175 Dated: 29-05-2024 UDIN: 24084175BKHZUV9121
Invest wise with Expert advice
IIFL Customer Care Number
(Gold/NCD/NBFC/Insurance/NPS)
1860-267-3000 / 7039-050-000
IIFL Capital Services Support WhatsApp Number
+91 9892691696
IIFL Capital Services Limited - Stock Broker SEBI Regn. No: INZ000164132, PMS SEBI Regn. No: INP000002213,IA SEBI Regn. No: INA000000623, SEBI RA Regn. No: INH000000248
ARN NO : 47791 (AMFI Registered Mutual Fund Distributor)
This Certificate Demonstrates That IIFL As An Organization Has Defined And Put In Place Best-Practice Information Security Processes.