Astrazeneca Pharma India Ltd Auditor Reports

<dhhead>Independent Auditor’s Report</dhhead>

 

To the Members of

AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited

Opinion

• We have audited the accompanying financial statements of AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2025, and the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other comprehensive income), the Statement of changes in equity and the Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements, including material accounting policy information and other explanatory information.

• In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2025, and total comprehensive income (comprising of profit and other comprehensive income), changes in equity and its cash flows for the year then ended.

 

Basis for Opinion

• We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the "Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements" section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements under the provisions of the Act and the Rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have

obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis

for our opinion.

Key audit matters

• Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current

period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

 

Rs.In Million

Key audit matter	How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Appropriateness of provisions recognised and contingencies disclosed with regards to certain tax and regulatory matters (Refer to the note 19 · “Provisions”, Note 20 · “Current tax liabilities (net)” and Note 32(b) “Contingent liabilities” to the financial statements)	Our procedures included the following:
There are certain direct, indirect tax cases and regulatory matters pending against the Company.	Understood, evaluated and tested the design and operating effectiveness of controls over the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure made in the financial statements in respect of these matters;
As at March 31, 2025, the Company has tax demands pertaining to direct and indirect tax matters aggregating to 1,740.9 million (including interest and penalties where applicable) of which 88.6 million has been provided for and 984.1 million along with regulatory demand of 1,573.9 million has been disclosed as contingent liabilities, which are significant to the financial statements.	Obtained a listing of the litigation matters and, read the correspondence with tax and regulatory authorities and where relevant, the advice received by the management from its external experts;
The Company has filed appeals against these tax demands with various appellate forums and with The Honourable High Court of Delhi on the NPPA matter which are currently pending adjudication.	Evaluated the independence, objectivity and competence of the management experts involved;
Management judgement is involved in evaluation of the likelihood of ultimate outcome of the tax and regulatory disputes and the probable amount of the provisions to be recognised and contingent liability to be disclosed and is hence determined to be a key audit matter.	Along with Auditor’s tax and regulatory experts:
	a. Gained an understanding of the current status of litigations through our inquiries with the management and determined impact, if any, based on recent rulings and latest developments in respective laws.
	b. Evaluated management’s assessment on the probability of outcome and the magnitude of potential outflow of economic resources in respect of:
	(i) provisions for uncertain tax exposures based on case history and other available evidence to challenge the valuation and completeness of the provisions recognised by the Management, and (ii) regulatory matter.
	c. Examined the evaluation obtained from the Company’s internal legal counsel to confirm our understanding of outstanding cases;
	d. Evaluated the adequacy of disclosures made in the financial statements.
Appropriateness of restructuring provision	Our audit procedures relating to provision for restructuring included the following:
(Refer Note 19 “Provisions” and Note 27B on “Exceptional items” to the financial statements)	Obtained an understanding and evaluated the management’s process for assessing the need for restructuring cost provision.
The Company’s management has approved a plan to shut down and dispose of its manufacturing facility located in Bengaluru. Management has prepared a detailed plan for the closure of the manufacturing facility.	Evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of financial controls over provision for restructuring costs including the assessment of the estimates involved and the timing of utilization of the provision.
Accordingly, a provision relating to such restructuring cost has been accounted for in the books amounting to 613.2 million. The expense related to the restructuring of 636.4 million has been presented as an ‘Exceptional item’ in the Statement of Profit and Loss.	Understood and evaluated the management’s plan for restructuring, which gave rise to a constructive obligation on the Company resulting in recognition of restructuring cost provision.
Significant management judgement is involved in estimation of the provision for restructuring, which is based on the Company’s policy, past history of settlements and best estimates of current expectations.	Verified the accuracy and completeness of the provision for restructuring cost by assessing the basis of restructuring provision and the mathematical accuracy of the computation.
Hence, this has been considered as a key audit matter.	Assessed the accounting principles applied by the Company to measure and recognise the restructuring cost provision.
	Verified the adequacy of disclosures in accordance with the Indian Accounting Standards and Companies Act Schedule III requirements.

 

 

 

Other Information

• The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

Responsibilities of management and those charged with governance for the financial statements

• The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Act with respect to the preparation of these financial

statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance, changes in equity

and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act. This responsibility

also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for

preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

• In preparing the financial statements, Board of Directors is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
• Those Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.

Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the

financial statements

• Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect

a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

• As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under Section 143(3)(i) of the Act, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the Company has adequate internal financial controls with reference to financial statements in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.
• Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to

draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report.

However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
• We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
• We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
• From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on other legal and regulatory requirements

• As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020 ("the Order"), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of Section 143 of the Act, we give in the "Annexure B" a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.
• As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:
• We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.
• In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company

so far as it appears from our examination of those books, except for the requirement of maintaining back up of certain books of account and other books and papers (which, however, have been maintained from January 20, 2025) and the matters stated in paragraph 15(h)(vi) below on reporting under Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended) ("the Rules") including the related backup of audit trail.

• The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other comprehensive income), the Statement of changes in equity and the Statement of cash flows dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.
• In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Indian Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act.
• On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2025, taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2025, from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.
• With respect to the maintenance of accounts and other matters connected therewith, reference is made to our remarks in paragraph 15(b) above on reporting under Section 143(3)(b) and paragraph 15(h)(vi) below on reporting under Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended).
• With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in "Annexure A".
• With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11

of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended), in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

• The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements – Refer Note 19 and 32(b) to the financial statements.
• The Company was not required to recognise a provision as at March 31, 2025 under

the applicable law or Indian Accounting Standards, as it does not have any material foreseeable losses on long-term contract. The Company did not have any derivative contracts as at March 31, 2025.

• There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company during the year.
• (a) The management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in Note 44(vi) to the

financial statements, no funds have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or share premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the Company to or in any other person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities

("Intermediaries"), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Intermediary shall, whether directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company ("Ultimate Beneficiaries") or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries;

• The management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in the Note 44(vii) to the financial statements, no funds have been received by the Company from any person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities ("Funding Parties"), with the

understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, whether directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party ("Ultimate Beneficiaries") or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries; and

• Based on such audit procedures that we considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to our notice that has caused us to believe that the representations under sub- clause (a) and (b) contain any material misstatement.
• The final dividend paid by the Company during the year in respect of the same declared for the previous year is in accordance with section 123 of the Companies Act 2013 to the extent it applies to payment of dividend.

As stated in Note 46 to the financial statements, the Board of Directors of the Company have proposed final dividend for the year which is subject to the approval

of the members at the ensuing Annual General Meeting. The dividend declared is in accordance with section 123 of the Act to the extent it applies to declaration of dividend.

• Based on our examination, which included test checks, the Company has used multiple accounting software for maintaining its books of account which has a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility and that has operated throughout the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the software, except that:
• in one accounting software, the audit trail was not maintained in case of modification by users with specific access during the period April 1, 2024 to March 5, 2025 and for direct database changes; and
• in accounting software which is operated by a third party service provider for maintaining books of account, the audit trail for one software does not contain the pre-modified values for direct database changes; in another software, audit

trail is maintained for direct database changes from October 1, 2024 onwards; and in another software, in the absence of any information pertaining to audit trail for direct database changes in the independent service auditor’s report, we are unable to comment on the audit trail (edit log) feature in that accounting software.

During the course of performing our procedures, other than the aforesaid instances of audit trail not maintained where the question of our commenting does not arise, we did not notice any instance of audit

trail feature being tampered with. Further, the audit trail, to the extent maintained in the prior financial year, has been preserved by the Company as per the statutory requirements for record retention.

• The Company has paid/ provided for managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of Section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.

For Price Waterhouse & Co Chartered Accountants LLP Firm Registration Number: 304026E/E-300009

 

Sharmila Ramaswamy

Partner

Place: Bengaluru Membership Number: 215131 Date: May 30, 2025 UDIN: 25215131BMNPYU4040

 

Annexure A to Independent Auditor’s Report

Referred to in paragraph 15(g) of the Independent Auditor’s Report of even date to the members of AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited on the financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2025

 

Report on the Internal Financial Controls with reference to Financial Statements under clause (i) of sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Act

• We have audited the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements of AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited ("the Company") as of March 31, 2025 in conjunction with our audit of the financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Management’s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

• The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting ("the Guidance Note") issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India ("ICAI"). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively

for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company’s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Act.

Auditor’s Responsibility

• Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal financial controls with reference to financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note and the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls, both applicable to an audit of internal financial controls and both issued by the ICAI. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan

and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls with reference to financial statements was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

• Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system with reference to financial statements and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls with reference to financial statements included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls with reference to financial statements, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on

the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

• We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company’s internal financial

controls system with reference to financial statements.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls with

reference to financial statements

• A companys internal financial controls with reference to financial statements is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal financial controls with reference to financial statements includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that,

in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

 

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls

with reference to financial statements

• Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls with reference to financial statements, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material

misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

• In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, adequate internal financial controls system with reference to financial statements and such internal

financial controls with reference to financial statements were operating effectively as at March 31, 2025, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note issued by ICAI.

 

For Price Waterhouse & Chartered Accountants LLP Firm Registration Number: 304026E/E-300009

 

Sharmila Ramaswamy

Partner

Place: Bengaluru Membership Number: 215131 Date: May 30, 2025 UDIN: 25215131BMNPYU4040

 

Annexure B to Independent Auditor’s Report

Referred to in paragraph 14 of the Independent Auditor’s Report of even date to the members of AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited on the financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2025.

 

In terms of the information and explanations sought by us and furnished by the Company, and the books of account and records examined by us during the course of our audit, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, we report that:

• (a)(A) The Company is maintaining proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation, of Property, Plant and Equipment.

(B) The Company is maintaining proper records

showing full particulars of Intangible Assets.

• The Property, Plant and Equipment are physically verified by the Management according to a phased programme designed to cover all the items over

a period of three years which, in our opinion,

is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. Pursuant to the programme, a portion of the Property, Plant and Equipment has been physically verified by the Management during the year and no

material discrepancies have been noticed on such verification.

• The title deeds of all the immovable properties (other than properties where the Company is the lessee and the lease agreements are duly executed in favour of the lessee), as disclosed in

Note 3A to the financial statements, are held in the

name of the Company.

• The Company has chosen cost model for its Property, Plant and Equipment (including Right of Use assets) and Intangible Assets. Consequently, the question of our commenting on whether

the revaluation is based on the valuation by a Registered Valuer, or specifying the amount of change, if the change is 10% or more in the

aggregate of the net carrying value of each class of

Property Transactions Act, 1988 (as amended in 2016) (formerly the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 (45 of 1988)) and Rules made thereunder, and therefore the question of our commenting on whether the Company has

appropriately disclosed the details in the financial

statements does not arise.

• (a)The physical verification of inventory (excluding stocks with third parties) has been conducted at reasonable intervals by the Management during the year and, in our opinion, the coverage and procedure of such verification by Management is appropriate. In respect of inventory lying with third parties, these have substantially been confirmed by them. The discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared to book records were not 10% or more in aggregate for each class of inventory.

• During the year, the Company has not been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of

5 crores, in aggregate from banks and financial institutions on the basis of security of current assets and accordingly, the question of our commenting on whether the quarterly returns or statements are in agreement with the unaudited books of account of the Company does not arise.

• (a)The Company has granted unsecured loans and advances in nature of loans to the employees of the Company. The aggregate amount during the year, and balance outstanding at the balance sheet are as per the table given below:

(in million)

 

Property, Plant and Equipment (including Right of Use assets) or Intangible Assets does not arise.

(e) Based on the information and explanations

Aggregate amount granted/ provided during the year

Balance outstanding as at

4.0 0.7

 

2.9 0.3

furnished to us, no proceedings have been initiated on (or) are pending against the Company for holding benami property under the Prohibition of Benami balance sheet (Also, refer Note 4 and Note 8 to the financial statements)

 

 

• In respect of the aforesaid loans/ advances in nature of loans, the terms and conditions under which such loans were granted are not prejudicial to the Company’s interest.

• In respect of the loans/ advances in nature of loans, the schedule of repayment of principal has been stipulated, and the parties are repaying the principal amounts, as stipulated.

• In respect of the loans/ advances in nature of loans, there is no amount which is overdue for more than ninety days.

• There were no loans/ advances in nature of loans which have fallen due during the year and were renewed/ extended. Further, no fresh loans were granted to same parties to settle the existing overdue loans/ advances in nature of loan.

• There were no loans/ advances in nature of loans which were granted during the year to promoters/ related parties.

The Company has not made any investments, granted secured loans or stood guarantee or provided security to any parties. Accordingly, to this extent, the reporting under clause 3(iii)(a), (iii)(b), (iii)(c), (iii)(d), (iii)(e) and (iii)(f) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• The Company has not granted any loans or made any investments or provided any guarantees or security to the parties covered under Sections 185 and 186.

Therefore, the reporting under clause 3(iv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

• The Company has not accepted any deposits or amounts which are deemed to be deposits referred in Sections 73, 74, 75 and 76 of the Act and the Rules framed there under.

• Pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government of India, the Company is required to maintain cost records as specified under Section 148(1) of the Act

in respect of its products. We have broadly reviewed the same and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

• (a)In our opinion, the Company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including income tax, provident fund, employees’ state insurance, sales tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess, goods

and services tax and other statutory dues, as applicable, with the appropriate authorities. Also, refer Note 45 to the financial statements regarding management’s assessment on certain matters relating to provident fund

• There are no statutory dues of provident fund,

employees’ state insurance, sales tax, duty of excise and value added tax which have not

been deposited on account of any dispute. The particulars of other statutory dues referred to in sub-clause (a) as at March 31, 2025 which have not been deposited on account of a dispute, are as follows:

 

 

Rs.In Million

Name of the statute	Nature of dues	Gross demand (in million)	Amount paid under protest (in million	Net amount (in million)	Period to which the amount relates	Forum where the dispute is pending
The Income Tax Act, 1961	Income Tax	28.5	5.1	23.4	2009-10	Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore
	Income Tax*	23.1	6.2	16.9	2010-11
	Income Tax*	201.9	201.9	-	2013-14	Honourable High Court of Karnataka
	Income Tax*	141.4	141.4	-	2014-15	Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore
The Income Tax Act, 1961	Income Tax*	156.1	53.7	102.4	2015-16	Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore
	Income Tax	312.1	3.5	308.6	2016-17	Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore
	Income Tax*	48.9	19.5	29.4	2017-18
	Income Tax	23.2	--	23.2	2019-20	Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bangalore
	Income Tax	161.5	37.0	124.5	2019-20	Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore
	Income Tax	196.8	40.0	156.8	2020-21
Customs Act, 1962	Duty of customs	21.2	-	21.2	2005-06	Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai
The Finance Act, 1994	Service Tax#	25.6	1.8	23.8	2006-07 to 2011-12	Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore
		4.9	0.2	4.7	2012-13
		1.5	0.1	1.4	April 2016 to June 2017
		51.6	1.9	49.7	December 2012 to March 2016
	Service Tax##	3.4	1.5	1.9	2013-14 to 2015-16
The Finance Act, 1994	Central Excise and Service Tax#	49.7	24.8	24.9	April 2016 to June 2017	Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore
Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017	Goods and Services Tax##	51.7	2.1	49.6	2017-18	Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Appeals), Thane
		211.0	9.2	201.8	2018-19
		10.4	-	10.4	April 2019 to March 2023	Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals), Bengaluru
	Goods and Services Tax#	16.4	-	16.4	April 2016 to June 2017
Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)	Improvement charges	70.8	-	70.8	2014	Honourable High Court of Karnataka

*Amount paid includes refunds due to the company which have been adjusted by the assessing officer, towards demands pending for other financial years. The amount paid in the table above has been restricted to the extent of the disputed amount.

#Includes penalty

##includes interest and penalty.

 

 

• There are no transactions previously unrecorded in the books of account that have been surrendered or disclosed as income during the year in the tax assessments under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

• (a)As the Company did not have any loans or other borrowings from any lender during the year, the reporting under clause 3(ix)(a) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• On the basis of our audit procedures, we report that the Company has not been declared Wilful Defaulter by any bank or financial institution or government or any government authority.

• The Company has not obtained any term loans. Accordingly, reporting under clause 3(ix)(c) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• According to the information and explanations given to us, and the procedures performed by us, and on an overall examination of the financial statements of the Company, the Company has

not raised funds on short-term basis. Accordingly, reporting under clause 3(ix)(d) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• According to the information and explanations

given to us and procedures performed by us, we report that the Company did not have any subsidiaries, joint ventures or associate

companies during the year. Accordingly, reporting under clause 3(ix)(e) and 3(ix)(f) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(x) (a) The Company has not raised any money by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments) during the year. Accordingly, the reporting under clause 3(x)(a) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• (b) The Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partially or optionally convertible debentures during the year. Accordingly, the reporting under clause 3(x)(b) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• (a)During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, we have neither come across any instance of material fraud by the Company or on the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor have we been informed of any such case

(xi) (b) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, a report under Section 143(12) of the Act, in Form ADT-4, as prescribed under rule 13 of Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 was not required to be filed with the Central Government. Accordingly, the reporting under clause 3(xi)(b) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(xi) (c) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, the Company has received whistle-blower complaints during the year, which

have been considered by us for any bearing on our audit and reporting under this clause. As explained by the management, there were certain complaints in respect of which investigations are ongoing as on the date of our report and our consideration of the complaints having any bearing on our audit is based on the information furnished to us by the management.

• As the Company is not a Nidhi Company and the Nidhi Rules, 2014 are not applicable to it, the reporting under clause 3(xii) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• The Company has entered into transactions with related parties in compliance with the provisions of Sections 177 and 188 of the Act. The details of related party transactions have been disclosed in the financial statements as required under Indian Accounting Standard 24 "Related Party Disclosures" specified under Section 133 of the Act. Refer Note 33 to financial statements for related party disclosures.

(xiv) (a) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of the business.

(xiv) (b) The reports of the Internal Auditor for the period

under audit have been considered by us.

• In our opinion, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with its directors or persons connected with him. Accordingly, the reporting on compliance with the provisions of Section 192 of the Act under clause 3(xv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• (a) The Company is not required to be registered under

Section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act,

? 138

by the Management.

1934. Accordingly, the reporting under clause 3(xvi)

• of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• The Company has not conducted non-banking financial housing finance activities during the year. Accordingly, the reporting under clause 3(xvi)(b) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• The Company is not a Core Investment Company (CIC) as defined in the regulations made by the Reserve Bank of India. Accordingly, the reporting under clause 3(xvi)(c) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• In our opinion, the Group (as defined in the Core Investment Companies (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016) does not have any CICs, which are part

of the Group. Accordingly, the reporting under clause 3(xvi)(d) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

• The Company has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year or in the immediately preceding financial year.

• There has been no resignation of the statutory auditors during the year and accordingly the reporting under clause 3(xviii) of the Order is not applicable.

• On the basis of the financial ratios, ageing and expected dates of realisation of financial assets and payment of financial liabilities, other information accompanying the financial statements, our knowledge of the Board of Directors and management plans

and based on our examination of the evidence supporting the assumptions, nothing has come to our attention, which causes us to believe that any material

uncertainty exists as on the date of the audit report that the Company is not capable of meeting its liabilities existing at the date of balance sheet as and when they fall due within a period of one year from the balance sheet date. We, however, state that this is not an assurance as to the future viability of the Company. We further state that our reporting is based on the facts up to the date of the audit report and we neither give any guarantee nor any assurance that all liabilities falling due within a period of one year from the balance sheet date will get discharged by the Company as and when they fall due.

• As at balance sheet date, the Company does not have any amount remaining unspent under Section 135(5) of the Act. Accordingly, reporting under clause 3(xx) of the Order is not applicable.

• The reporting under clause 3(xxi) of the Order is not applicable in respect of audit of Standalone Financial Statements. Accordingly, no comment in respect of the said clause has been included in this report.

 

For Price Waterhouse & Chartered Accountants LLP

Firm Registration Number: 304026E/E-300009

 

Sharmila Ramaswamy

Partner

Place: Bengaluru

Membership Number: 215131 Date: May 30, 2025

UDIN: 25215131BMNPYU4040