These central banks need to ensure price stability. That means; prices cannot be allowed to spiral out of control. At the same time, these central banks must also ensure maximum employment. Normally, maximum employment is also used as a proxy for GDP growth since it is only when GDP growth is robust that jobs are created. In the last couple of years, this dilemma had largely reduced because growth continued to be robust, unemployment levels were very low but inflation was spiralling out of control. Hence central banks only had to focus on inflation. That is changing as countries are increasingly facing the ghost of weak consumer demand. Economists are apprehensive that there could be a full-fledged recession.
It is in this context that the recent lecture by Governor Philip Jefferson, member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, at Harvard University assumes significance. At the Harvard University, Governor Jefferson spoke at length about “Recent Inflation and the Dual Mandate”. While inflation is something that is almost palpable to everyone, from a policy standpoint it is the measurement of inflation and the appropriate policy response that really matters. After all, there is the dual mandate always lurking in the background.
Measuring inflation – The US experience
Normally, WPI inflation is not very useful in inflation policy responses and it is the consumer inflation that is of greater import. However, the idea of consumer inflation, itself, is nuanced. For instance, in the US, there are broadly two types of consumer inflation that is tracked. On the one hand, there is the consumer (CPI) inflation that is announced by the Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) in the second week of each month. However, what the Fed actually uses for its policy decisions is the PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditure) inflation. This PCE inflation is normally announced towards the end of each month. But, how exactly does the PCE inflation differ from the traditional consumer inflation (CPI). In PCE and CPI inflation, Fed looks separately at headline inflation and also at core inflation components.
Broadly, both the CPI inflation and the PCE inflation are similar in that they measure the change in the index of prices of a basket of goods against the base year. Positive changes in this index are recorded as inflation and in the US, there is importance given to YOY inflation and also to MOM inflation. The two indices differ in the weight assigned to specific items. PCE price index has a broader scope than the CPI. The CPI is limited to expenditures that households pay out of pocket, while the PCE also covers items like Medicaid provided to them. Housing is much bigger in CPI while medical services is much bigger in PCE. Also, PCE provides time-varying weights, while CPI provides static weights. Hence, policymakers find the PCE more reflective of inflation from a policy perspective.
Why inflation has been the focus since 2021
One thing is clear, the Fed has veered towards inflation control in its policy focus. The reasons are not far to seek. The negative real GDP growth in the first two quarters of 2022 were largely driven by very high levels of inflation. In fact, if the inflation deflator was excluded, then the nominal rates of growth were attractive all through this period. That reinforced the Fed commitment to focus more on inflation control as the theme of central bank policy. The other aspect was employment. The unemployment rate in the US had fallen to 3.5%, which is almost 150 bps below what the Fed defines as full employment levels. As a result, the Fed had to be doubly focused on inflation so as to make rate hikes impactful after adjusting for the effect of strong labour data.
Advantages of focusing on 2% inflation in the US
There are several reasons why the Fed has focused hard on containing inflation to 2% levels or, at least, wait till inflation is on a sure shot journey towards 2%.
Why the dual mandate assumes importance?
As Jefferson rightly pointed out in his speech, this dual mandate is especially relevant as it is all about Fed credibility. As long as the Fed is working on containing inflation, it keeps the consumers happy and confident that inflation would eventually come under control. That is why the hawkishness of the Fed is important. However, that is where the dual mandate come in. There are several indications that the US economy could eventually slip into recession and there are 3 such indications.
Here is where the Fed has to balance the dual mandate. After all, if inflation is bad then a recession is worse. That is something, the Fed can ill afford.
What are the takeaways for India?
In a sense, the Indian economy also finds itself in a similar situation. The RBI has been steadfast about containing inflation. However, the impact on growth has not been too visible, although the third quarter of FY23 did see real GDP growth dip to 4.4% and nominal GDP growth also dip to 10.8%. India has managed inflation control through monetary policy while it has managed to sustain growth through fiscal policy. The latest budget measures on putting more money in the hands of people and infrastructure spending are cases in point.
RBI believes, and rightly so, that persistently high inflation hurts everyone and hence the RBI is unlikely to relent on its anti-inflation stance. The 4% inflation target may still be quite far away and how India manages to contain inflation without hampering the GDP growth will be the litmus test.
Related Tags
IIFL Customer Care Number
(Gold/NCD/NBFC/Insurance/NPS)
1860-267-3000 / 7039-050-000
IIFL Capital Services Support WhatsApp Number
+91 9892691696
IIFL Capital Services Limited - Stock Broker SEBI Regn. No: INZ000164132, PMS SEBI Regn. No: INP000002213,IA SEBI Regn. No: INA000000623, SEBI RA Regn. No: INH000000248, DP SEBI Reg. No. IN-DP-185-2016
ARN NO : 47791 (AMFI Registered Mutual Fund Distributor)
This Certificate Demonstrates That IIFL As An Organization Has Defined And Put In Place Best-Practice Information Security Processes.