March 2023 marks exactly 3 years since the post-COVID phase started in late March 2020. It was a bottom from where the economy and the stock markets bounced back sharply, as India emerged as the fastest growing large economy by a margin. In this entire growth story, one very key player was the growth in financial inclusion with more investors adopting the mutual funds route. Let us look at how the mutual fund AUMs have grown in the post COVID 3 year period.
Macro picture for MF AUM growth since COVID
The first quarter of calendar 2020 marked one of the worst periods economically and also from a stock markets point of view. Surprisingly, that also proved the pivot point for investors to adopt the mutual funds route more aggressively. Here is the macro view.
All Mutual Funds |
AUM (Mar-23) |
AUM (Mar-22) |
AUM (Mar-21) |
AUM (Mar-20) |
3-Year Growth |
OPEN ENDED SCHEMES |
39,07,838 |
36,95,800 |
29,96,553 |
20,50,734 |
90.56% |
CLOSED ENDED SCHEMES |
34,193 |
60,883 |
1,46,211 |
1,75,469 |
-80.51% |
Grand Total AUM |
39,42,031 |
37,56,683 |
31,42,764 |
22,26,203 |
77.07% |
Data Source: AMFI (figures in Rs crore)
As seen in the table above, the overall AUM of Indian mutual funds has gone up by 77%, partially helped by positive markets but also largely by flows. Since the COVID recovery started in March 2020, the AUM of open ended funds has grown by over 90% while the AUM of closed ended funds has shrunk to a fifth of the COVID levels.
Diverse trends emerge in debt funds AUM
Since the post COVID recovery started in March 2020, the AUM of debt funds are up 14.85%. That looks like a reasonable number, but that probably conceals the vastly diverse trends that are underlying this average. The table below is self-explicit.
Income / Debt Funds |
AUM (Mar-23) |
AUM (Mar-22) |
AUM (Mar-21) |
AUM (Mar-20) |
3-Year Growth |
Long Duration Fund |
8,798 |
2,523 |
2,578 |
1,670 |
426.95% |
Gilt Fund 10-year-D |
3,760 |
1,261 |
1,500 |
941 |
299.38% |
Gilt Fund |
21,458 |
15,222 |
16,246 |
9,285 |
131.11% |
Money Market Fund |
1,08,468 |
1,14,219 |
89,758 |
57,017 |
90.24% |
Floater Fund |
52,989 |
80,632 |
65,436 |
32,490 |
63.09% |
Dynamic Bond Fund |
29,287 |
25,312 |
27,552 |
18,116 |
61.66% |
Corporate Bond Fund |
1,30,767 |
1,30,073 |
1,60,125 |
81,730 |
60.00% |
Overnight Fund |
95,626 |
1,03,071 |
71,009 |
80,174 |
19.27% |
Banking and PSU Fund |
80,517 |
93,383 |
1,19,559 |
72,476 |
11.10% |
Ultra-Short Duration |
79,123 |
87,948 |
91,998 |
72,226 |
9.55% |
Low Duration Fund |
86,693 |
1,12,745 |
1,29,767 |
81,371 |
6.54% |
Liquid Fund |
3,32,498 |
3,45,903 |
3,36,598 |
3,34,725 |
-0.67% |
Short Duration Fund |
91,239 |
1,15,856 |
1,45,662 |
93,444 |
-2.36% |
Medium Duration Fund |
27,091 |
32,983 |
31,740 |
28,290 |
-4.24% |
Medium / Long Duration |
8,895 |
10,055 |
10,390 |
9,805 |
-9.28% |
Credit Risk Fund |
24,776 |
27,772 |
28,308 |
55,381 |
-55.26% |
Debt Funds Total |
11,81,982 |
12,98,961 |
13,28,226 |
10,29,142 |
14.85% |
Data Source: AMFI (figures in Rs crore)
Let us look at the funds that have shown de-growth in AUM over March 2020. There are 5 categories of funds with the worst being Credit Risk funds that have seen AUMs compress by over 55% since the COVID crisis. That is understandable as it also coincided with the Templeton credit risk fiasco. Also, in the last 3 years, the downside risks of credit risk funds have been ruthlessly exposed. The AUM has also shrunk in funds like the short duration funds and medium duration funds. Essentially, these are funds where the fund manager has good deal of discretion on asset allocation and that is not what investors appear to be comfortable with.
On the positive side, several categories of funds like long duration funds, 10-year gilt funds and gilt bond funds have seen a smart growth in AUM. One argument could be the low base, and that is largely true, but it also underlines a trend where investors are increasingly inclined to take price risk for the longer term for the safety of longer term returns. Interestingly, there is also substantial appetite for dynamic funds and corporate bond funds. However, the AUM of debt funds have fallen very sharply by 10% to 11% as compared to March 2021 and March 2022.
Equity funds saw a new breed of investors
It is not just that equity funds have been the stars of the post COVID recovery. The equity funds AUM has overall grown by a whopping 162%, but the good thing is that each of the equity classes have more than doubled their AUM since the post-COVID recovery started. For simplicity, we have combined flexi-cap and multi-cap funds since that would make them more comparable over a 3 year period.
Equity Funds |
AUM (Mar-23) |
AUM (Mar-22) |
AUM (Mar-21) |
AUM (Mar-20) |
3-Year Growth |
Dividend Yield Fund |
13,994 |
9,819 |
6,735 |
3,282 |
326.39% |
Small Cap Fund |
1,33,384 |
1,06,857 |
69,799 |
35,832 |
272.25% |
Sectoral/Thematic Funds |
1,72,819 |
1,48,830 |
98,080 |
49,844 |
246.72% |
Large & Mid Cap Fund |
1,27,842 |
1,10,143 |
76,428 |
42,972 |
197.50% |
Mid Cap Fund |
1,83,256 |
1,59,928 |
1,16,403 |
65,805 |
178.48% |
Multi / Flexi Cap Fund |
3,09,020 |
2,80,363 |
1,78,616 |
1,13,908 |
171.29% |
Focused Fund |
98,673 |
96,710 |
68,603 |
39,072 |
152.54% |
Value Fund/Contra Fund |
90,584 |
78,774 |
61,150 |
39,460 |
129.56% |
Large Cap Fund |
2,35,760 |
2,26,191 |
1,78,324 |
1,13,541 |
107.64% |
ELSS |
1,51,751 |
1,47,841 |
1,25,228 |
74,791 |
102.90% |
Equity Funds Total |
15,17,082 |
13,65,456 |
9,79,367 |
5,78,508 |
162.24% |
Data Source: AMFI (figures in Rs crore)
The bottom performer in the equity funds category is the ELSS category, and even that has grown AUM at 103% since the post-COVID recovery started. At the top, the dividend yield funds have grown due to the very low base. Also, much of the growth impetus came with the SBI Dividend Yield Fund NFO in March 2023. But there are other interesting stories emerging. For example, there is a strong preference for the alpha oriented stories like small-cap funds, mid-cap funds, thematic funds, sectoral funds etc.
Investors are more willing to opt for specific equity stories and would rather prefer passive funds to play the generic diversified stories. That is evident in the large cap funds showing subdued growth in AUM since the COVID recovery. A new breed of young millennial investors is not only willing to take the right kind of risks, but also willing to play the passive game where necessary.
Hybrids were all about fancy ideas
Hybrid funds have gone through phases. First it was conservative hybrids, then it was BAFs (balanced advantage funds) and now it is multi-allocation funds. The table below captures the changing tastes in the world of hybrids.
Hybrid Funds |
AUM (Mar-23) |
AUM (Mar-22) |
AUM (Mar-21) |
AUM (Mar-20) |
3-Year Growth |
Multi Asset Allocation Fund |
26,591 |
19,582 |
14,795 |
9,439 |
181.70% |
Dynamic Asset Allocation / BAF |
1,91,810 |
1,78,863 |
1,07,883 |
77,091 |
148.81% |
Conservative Hybrid Fund |
23,170 |
21,074 |
12,916 |
11,190 |
107.07% |
Aggressive Hybrid Fund |
1,53,899 |
1,48,519 |
1,23,075 |
1,00,990 |
52.39% |
Equity Savings Fund |
16,012 |
16,664 |
9,759 |
11,229 |
42.60% |
Arbitrage Fund |
67,435 |
95,217 |
74,530 |
52,210 |
29.16% |
Hybrid Funds Total |
4,78,917 |
4,79,918 |
3,42,957 |
2,62,150 |
82.69% |
Data Source: AMFI (figures in Rs crore)
The overall growth of hybrid funds AUM is impressive at 82.7%, but it has been more about changing tastes in the market. In many cases, the AUMs have grown rapidly in a short span of time but have then saturated once the yields did not match up.
Finally, the big story of passive growth
The biggest story of post COVID recovery was the shift to passives. The lower cost and the index tracking yields were good enough for investors as can be seen from the table.
Passive Funds |
AUM (Mar-23) |
AUM (Mar-22) |
AUM (Mar-21) |
AUM (Mar-20) |
3-Year Growth |
Index Funds |
1,67,517 |
68,676 |
19,164 |
8,089 |
1970.92% |
Fund of funds (Overseas) |
22,991 |
22,609 |
12,408 |
2,734 |
740.82% |
Other ETFs |
4,84,277 |
4,11,362 |
2,75,931 |
1,46,463 |
230.65% |
GOLD ETF |
22,737 |
19,281 |
14,123 |
7,949 |
186.03% |
Passive Funds Total |
6,97,522 |
5,21,928 |
3,21,626 |
1,65,235 |
322.14% |
Data Source: AMFI (figures in Rs crore)
With passive AUMs growing 322% in the post-COVID period, this is possibly the biggest story. Low costs, index tracking returns and limited risk has made these funds a preferred choice for investors. The phenomenal growth in index funds is not just explained by equity index funds but debt index funds as well. The big story is that index ETFs have today emerges as the single category with the highest AUM in the entire mutual fund industry. That, perhaps, best sums up the story of the post-COVID recovery in mutual fund AUM.
Related Tags
IIFL Customer Care Number
(Gold/NCD/NBFC/Insurance/NPS)
1860-267-3000 / 7039-050-000
IIFL Capital Services Support WhatsApp Number
+91 9892691696
IIFL Capital Services Limited - Stock Broker SEBI Regn. No: INZ000164132, PMS SEBI Regn. No: INP000002213,IA SEBI Regn. No: INA000000623, SEBI RA Regn. No: INH000000248
ARN NO : 47791 (AMFI Registered Mutual Fund Distributor)
This Certificate Demonstrates That IIFL As An Organization Has Defined And Put In Place Best-Practice Information Security Processes.