FED MINUTES BETRAY A FRACTURED HOUSE
If you though that the minutes of the September 18, 2024 Fed monetary policy would read like a consensus decision to cut rates by 50 basis points, think again. The previous week saw the Fed minutes published, which showed that the debate among the members of the FOMC was lot more fracture than what the final verdict manifested. The Fed decision is a median view and it glosses over the nuances of individual opinion. In most of these high powered meetings, there is a thin line between dissent, hesitation, ambivalence, neutrality, and assent. That was in ample evidence as displayed in the FOMC minutes published during the week. Michelle Bowman may have been the visible opponent of a 50 bps rate cut but the FOMC had its share of other sceptical members too.
Broadly, if you leave out the supporters of the 50 bps rate cut in the FOMC, the rest could be divided into 3 groups; Opponent, Ambivalent, and Indifferent. Let us understand why this sub-classification is important as it shows that the decision was something deeper. Michelle Bowman was firmly opposed to the decision to cut rates by 50 bps; since she felt that 25 bps would have been sufficient. Bowman had pointed to two distinct risks in a 50 bps rate cut. The first risk was that the markets may interpret the move as the Fed declaring victory over inflation. The second risk was giving out the image that the US growth story was in dire straits and it needs a monetary boost from the Fed. Both were distortions of the truth. As Bowman put it, if Fed wanted to send “an end of rate hike” signal; 25 bps was good enough.
Besides the unambiguous opposition of Bowman; there were also the Ambivalent and the Neutral members of the FOMC. The Ambivalent group was not sure if their ambivalence was strong enough reason to oppose the 50 bps rate cut with a dissent note. Then there were the members of the Neutral group. These people were largely sitting on the fence. They gave full support to the 50 bps rate cut, but would have equally done so had the FOMC proposed a 25 bps rate cut. In fact, several members who had voted in favour of the Fed decision to cut rates by 50 bps, appeared to indicating in the debate that they would be more comfortable with the Fed embarking on a 25 bps rate cut. To cut a long story short, the Fed vote may have been decisive, but the view behind the scenes was more fractured.
RECAP – CME FEDWATCH FOR PREVIOUS WEEK ENDED OCTOBER 04, 2024
Let us start with a recap of the week to October 04, 2024; and how the CME Fedwatch panned out during the week. This was a week after the Fed cut rates by 50 bps, so the dovishness of the Fed and the sense of celebration was evident in the probability distribution of rate cut expectations. This week also had the important jobs data.
Fed Meet | 225-250 | 250-275 | 275-300 | 300-325 | 325-350 | 350-375 | 375-400 | 400-425 | 425-450 | 450-475 | 475-500 |
Nov-24 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 97.4 | 2.6% |
Dec-24 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 17.7% | 80.2% | 2.1% | Nil |
Jan-25 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 14.8% | 69.8% | 15.1% | 0.3% | Nil |
Mar-25 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 11.8% | 58.8% | 26.0% | 3.3% | 0.1% | Nil |
May-25 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 6.7% | 38.5% | 40.2% | 13.1% | 1.5% | Nil | Nil |
Jun-25 | Nil | Nil | Nil | 3.9% | 25.2% | 39.5% | 24.4% | 6.3% | 0.6% | Nil | Nil |
Jul-25 | Nil | Nil | 1.3% | 10.9% | 29.9% | 34.5% | 18.5% | 4.5% | 0.4% | Nil | Nil |
Sep-25 | Nil | 0.4% | 4.6% | 17.5% | 31.5% | 29.0% | 13.6% | 3.1% | 0.3% | Nil | Nil |
Oct-25 | 0.1% | 1.4% | 7.6% | 20.8% | 30.9% | 25.4% | 11.1% | 2.4% | 0.2% | Nil | Nil |
Dec-25 | 0.4% | 2.7% | 10.4% | 22.9% | 29.8% | 22.4% | 9.3% | 2.0% | 0.2% | Nil | Nil |
Data source: CME Fedwatch
The week to October 04, 2024 was dominated by the US unemployment numbers announced on Friday. There were 3 key data points in the week gone by.
Let us cut to the current week to October 11, 2024; which saw some very important data points for the CME Fedwatch.
CUT TO PRESENT: CME FEDWATCH IN WEEK TO OCTOBER 11, 2024
The latest week to October 11, 2024 saw the CME Fedwatch continue to factor in 3-4 rate cuts in 2024, but also toned down to just 175-200 bps rate cut by end of 2025.
Fed Meet | 225-250 | 250-275 | 275-300 | 300-325 | 325-350 | 350-375 | 375-400 | 400-425 | 425-450 | 450-475 | 475-500 |
Nov-24 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 89.5% | 10.5% |
Dec-24 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 84.4% | 15.0% | 0.6% |
Jan-25 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 68.5% | 28.0% | 3.3% | 0.1% |
Mar-25 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 65.8% | 29.7% | 4.3% | 0.2% | Nil |
May-25 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 43.5% | 41.9% | 12.9% | 1.6% | 0.1% | Nil |
Jun-25 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 28.2% | 42.5% | 23.1% | 5.6% | 0.6% | Nil | Nil |
Jul-25 | Nil | Nil | Nil | 9.9% | 33.2% | 35.7% | 17.0% | 3.8% | 0.4% | Nil | Nil |
Sep-25 | Nil | Nil | 3.2% | 17.5% | 34.0% | 29.6% | 12.7% | 2.7% | 0.3% | Nil | Nil |
Oct-25 | Nil | 0.8% | 6.6% | 21.4% | 33.0% | 25.6% | 10.4% | 2.2% | 0.2% | Nil | Nil |
Dec-25 | 0.2% | 2.0% | 9.6% | 23.8% | 31.4% | 22.5% | 8.7% | 1.8% | 0.2% | Nil | Nil |
(Data source: CME Fedwatch)
A quick reading of the CME Fedwatch post the inflation announcement tells you that the rate cut probabilities have not really changed much since they stabilized in a tighter range. However, the dovishness is gradually plateauing. Here is a quick summary.
CME Fedwatch is getting less dovish as the growth appears to be a lot more robust and the inflation still looks vulnerable to a sudden spike. The CME Fedwatch is still pencilling 75 bps to 100 bps overall rate cut by end of 2024 and 175 bps to 200 bps overall by end of 2025. Let us now turn to the triggers for the coming week for the CME Fedwatch.
TRIGGERS FOR CME FEDWATCH: NEXT WEEK TO OCTOBER 18, 2024
The coming week to October 18, 2024 will be dominated by the FOMC minutes and the announcement of the consumer inflation by the US.
Let us finally turn to the big story of how all these news flows added up to influence the CME Fedwatch probabilities in the latest week.
RATES TRAJECTORY – MORE UPFRONT, OR MORE BACK-ENDED?
The Fed has clearly opted for front loading of rate cuts and it wants to give a message that the central bank means business and can act decisively, either ways. However, some of the recent data flows are likely to put limits on the extent of dovishness of the Fed. For example, the second quarter final GDP and the recent jobs data are indicating that hard landing may not really be a concern for the US economy. Also, the Fed minutes suggest that, while the Fed cut rates by 50 bps, most FOMC members would have preferred a 25 bps rate cut. Even the recent consumer inflation data shows potential risks to inflation; with the strife in West Asia is getting worse. Rising oil prices have the potential to be inflationary.
Here is a quick look at how the rate cut probabilities panned out after all the recent key data points like the unemployment data, consumer inflation data, minutes of the Fed meeting etc were already factored into the CME Fedwatch. Here is what we read from the CME Fedwatch chart.
Will the Fed adhere to such an aggressive time table? To be fair, the Fed view and the CME Fedwatch vie are now almost in sync. That looks like a fair path ahead, unless inflation spikes sharply due to the oil price effect. Then the equations for the US Federal Reserve could change rapidly. An overall rate cut of 75-100 bps by end of 2024 and an overall rate cut of 175-200 bps by end of 2025 looks like a very plausible scenario!
Related Tags
IIFL Customer Care Number
(Gold/NCD/NBFC/Insurance/NPS)
1860-267-3000 / 7039-050-000
IIFL Capital Services Support WhatsApp Number
+91 9892691696
IIFL Capital Services Limited - Stock Broker SEBI Regn. No: INZ000164132, PMS SEBI Regn. No: INP000002213,IA SEBI Regn. No: INA000000623, SEBI RA Regn. No: INH000000248
ARN NO : 47791 (AMFI Registered Mutual Fund Distributor)
This Certificate Demonstrates That IIFL As An Organization Has Defined And Put In Place Best-Practice Information Security Processes.