iifl-logo-icon 1

Invest wise with Expert advice

By continuing, I accept the T&C and agree to receive communication on Whatsapp

sidebar image

Apr-24 IIP at 4.98%, as manufacturing slows due to higher base

14 Jun 2024 , 11:25 AM


April 2024, once again, saw a rather mixed show in terms of the IIP growth. To be fair, the base moved up from 1.95% to 4.61% in the year-ago period. Hence, the flat IIP growth was totally understandable. However, the previous month’s IIP has been sharply revised upwards, so the current April 2024 IIP is sharply lower than the March 2024 IIP. Remember, IIP is always reported with a lag of one-month. The month saw an improvement in mining and electricity output, but manufacturing output took a knock on account of the higher base and that kept the IIP growth in check.

Let us quickly turn to the IIP revisions. Typically, the IIP growth goes through 2 revisions; the final revision after 3 months and the preliminary revision after 1 month. The month saw the release of final revision for the month of January 2024, wherein the overall IIP growth got upgraded by 7 basis points from 4.14% to 4.21%. At the same time, the first revision for March 2024 saw the IIP figure a sharper upgrade by 47 basis points from 4.94% to 5.41%. Overall, the shifts were positive and that does give some insights into how the future revisions of April 2024 IIP could be. The revision are important as they cover more data points and also adjust for granular categories data coming in.


The regular IIP growth that we see is yoy growth; compared to the year-ago period. However, the yoy number is too vulnerable to the base effect and does not capture the short term eccentricities of IIP data. That gap is filled by MOM high frequency IIP data. How does that look for April 2024? Unlike in March, in April, the high frequency growth across mining and manufacturing was negative while only electricity had positive IIP growth. That is broadly stressful. For the month of April 2024, the high frequency mining IIP was -16.26% lower and the high frequency manufacturing IIP was also down -7.56%. However, electricity bucked the trend; as it showed MOM growth of 3.82%. The pressure on manufacturing means that the end result gravitated towards manufacturing, due to its weight. Thus, the overall MOM (high frequency) IIP reading for April 2024 sharply down  MOM by -7.63%. The MOM numbers have disappointed, especially within mining and manufacturing.


In the last 3 months, the trend in mining, manufacturing, and electricity have been oscillating. For example, in January 2024, it was manufacturing growth that was relatively tepid, while mining and electricity showed robust growth. In February 2024, all 3 showed sharply better levels compared to the previous month. However, in March 2024, Manufacturing and Electricity growth was robust, while mining output fell sharply.

Let us start with mining IIP for April 2024 on yoy basis. The April 2024 mining IIP growth was strong at just 6.7%, compared to just 1.3% in March 2024. If you look at electricity IIP, it stood at 10.2% in April 2024, compared to 8.6% in March 2024. The positive trend could not be sustained by manufacturing, which saw IIP growth in April 2024 taper to 3.9% compared to just 5.8% in March 2024. As a result, the overall IIP for April 2024 at 5.0% was lower than the revised IIP reading of 5.4% for March 2024. Manufacturing proved to be major drag on IIP in April 2024.


Despite the base IIP number between March 2023 and April 2023 shifting sharply higher from 1.95% to 4.61%; the yoy IIP in April is only marginally lower; and that too because the previous data has been revised upwards. This is partially attributed to election related weakness in key output stacks.

Month IIP Growth (%)
Mar-23 1.95%
Apr-23 4.61%
May-23 5.66%
Jun-23 4.05%
Jul-23 6.18%
Aug-23 10.87%
Sep-23 6.35%
Oct-23  11.89%
Nov-23 2.47%
Dec-23 4.39%
Jan-24 4.21%
Feb-24 5.60%
Mar-24 5.41%
Apr-24 4.98%

Data Source: MOSPI

There are 2 positive takeaways from the latest IIP data. Firstly, the Red Sea crisis and the disruption of trade routes, is seeing diminishing impact on IIP. That is good news and it is also not surprising since India continues to be an inward looking economy. However, it must be mentioned that it is the export basket that is pressuring the IIP number this year. The other positive takeaway is the gradual revival in rural demand. Many Indian companies have proactively tweaked packaging sizes to keep rural consumers happy with lower unit sizes. The outcome is that the Indian rural consumer is back with shopping bags. Rural growth could be the X-factor going ahead.


The table captures comparative IIP growth for last 4 months, with respective component weights. Cumulative numbers for mining, manufacturing, and electricity are segregated.

Product Basket Weights Jan-24 Feb-24 Mar-24 Apr-24
Manufacture of food products 5.3025 0.6 2.9 -3.2 -12.7
Manufacture of beverages 1.0354 8.0 14.9 0.6 11.7
Manufacture of tobacco products 0.7985 -8.4 -0.5 -17.9 -8.9
Manufacture of textiles 3.2913 1.7 3.6 -3.4 0.3
Manufacture of wearing apparel 1.3225 -2.3 -2.9 7.6 12.6
Manufacture of leather and related products 0.5021 0.5 1.7 -9.7 -8.6
Manufacture of wood products 0.1930 3.4 7.0 3.1 -5.5
Manufacture of paper products 0.8724 -6.2 4.7 0.1 -4.0
Printing and reproduction of recorded media 0.6798 3.2 6.0 0.7 -5.4
Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products 11.7749 -2.1 4.1 0.9 4.9
Manufacture of chemical products 7.8730 -2.0 1.6 0.2 0.0
Manufacture of pharmaceuticals 4.9810 0.7 -10.6 17.2 3.1
Manufacture of rubber and plastics products 2.4222 7.1 12.6 6.0 3.2
Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products 4.0853 3.0 8.8 8.2 1.7
Manufacture of basic metals 12.8043 7.6 9.1 8.5 8.1
Manufacture of fabricated metal products 2.6549 16.8 14.3 20.3 10.2
Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products 1.5704 -7.6 1.9 0.4 3.9
Manufacture of electrical equipment 2.9983 2.6 9.8 14.4 3.3
Manufacture of machinery and equipment 4.7653 3.0 3.7 2.7 1.0
Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers, and semi-trailers 4.8573 18.9 11.6 6.5 11.4
Manufacture of other transport equipment 1.7763 25.3 24.4 26.2 17.4
Manufacture of furniture 0.1311 15.0 22.7 32.1 38.4
Other manufacturing 0.9415 -6.7 -6.5 -17.1 10.7
MINING 14.3725 6.0 8.1 1.3 6.7
MANUFACTURING 77.6332 3.6 4.9 5.8 3.9
ELECTRICITY 7.9943 5.6 7.5 8.6 10.2
OVERALL IIP 100.0000 4.2 5.6 5.4 5.0

Data Source: MOSPI

The last column shows the most current IIP reading for April 2024. IIP numbers are reported with a lag of 1 month. Here are the key takeaways.

  • The IIP growth of 5.0% in April 2024, is lower than the revised 5.4% in March 2024. However, April is on a much higher base and is prior to revisions. That means, manufacturing has put pressure on the IIP, even as mining and electricity did better. The overall IIP obviously gravitated towards the manufacturing growth, considering its 77.6% weightage in the IIP basket.
  • In the month of April 2024, the products that saw the highest positive growth were furniture, transport equipment, wearing apparel, beverages, motor vehicles / trailers, fabricated metal products, base metals, refined petroleum, and electronics. These are largely domestic demand triggered; although apparel and electronics have a strong export component too. The products that saw the sharpest fall in IIP include food products, tobacco products, leather products, wood products, printing / recorded media, and paper products. Apart from weak demand, the exports are also being hit by the Red Sea crisis and that is slowing this segment.

In April 2024, it was manufacturing that came under stress and that could be partially attributed to the uncertainty surrounding elections. Hopefully, that should not get rectified.


The latest fiscal year FY25 is just the one month of April, so cumulative numbers will correspond with the monthly numbers. The cumulative IIP growth for FY24 at 6.0% was better than FY23 at 5.5%. However, FY22 may not be comparable due to the low base of the previous year resulting in a COVID driven rally in the IIP growth.

Product Basket Weights 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Manufacture of food products 5.3025 5.9 3.8 1.7 -12.7
Manufacture of beverages 1.0354 11.5 23.9 5.7 11.7
Manufacture of tobacco products 0.7985 8.7 1.4 -7.5 -8.9
Manufacture of textiles 3.2913 29.3 -8.4 0.2 0.3
Manufacture of wearing apparel 1.3225 27.4 0.2 -13.8 12.6
Manufacture of leather and related products 0.5021 1.3 -3.9 -0.6 -8.6
Manufacture of wood products 0.1930 15.1 1.1 -5.6 -5.5
Manufacture of paper and paper products 0.8724 17.7 0.8 -3.5 -4.0
Printing and reproduction of recorded media 0.6798 12.4 24.5 -1.0 -5.4
Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum 11.7749 8.9 6.1 4.0 4.9
Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products 7.8730 4.3 7.1 -1.6 0.0
Manufacture of pharmaceuticals 4.9810 1.3 -2.0 9.0 3.1
Manufacture of rubber and plastics products 2.4222 8.0 0.7 4.5 3.2
Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products 4.0853 20.1 7.2 6.7 1.7
Manufacture of basic metals 12.8043 18.6 8.1 11.7 8.1
Manufacture of fabricated metal products 2.6549 10.9 -0.5 8.4 10.2
Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical 1.5704 11.1 -2.8 -10.5 3.9
Manufacture of electrical equipment 2.9983 12.2 0.9 7.8 3.3
Manufacture of machinery and equipment 4.7653 11.0 11.3 6.8 1.0
Manufacture of motor vehicles and trailers 4.8573 18.4 22.1 11.6 11.4
Manufacture of other transport equipment 1.7763 1.6 17.5 14.5 17.4
Manufacture of furniture 0.1311 23.3 21.0 -5.9 38.4
Other manufacturing 0.9415 49.0 -0.7 -5.5 10.7
MINING 14.3725 12.2 5.7 7.9 6.7
MANUFACTURING 77.6332 11.8 5.0 5.5 3.9
ELECTRICITY 7.9943 7.9 9.2 7.2 10.2
OVERALL IIP 100.0000 11.4 5.5 6.0 5.0

Data Source: MOSPI (FY25 is for just one month)

The last column refers to data for FY25; but then it is for just one month, so it corresponds with the month data that we already discussed about. There is only one month data so it is tough to compare with the previous years. However, FY24 IIP growth has been about 50 bps higher than the FY23 IIP growth and that is good news. The second positive takeaway is that if you look at the list of sectors among leaders and laggards; then some of the sectors like electronics and apparels are seeing a revival in demand. This is largely on account of the very aggressive implementation of the PLI (production linked incentive) scheme that has helped boost the exports of these sectors despite global challenges and headwinds. What is interesting is that the IIP data has been robust despite the Red Sea crisis. This can be attributed to the trickle-down effect of the PLI schemes and revival of capital investment cycle. A lot will now predicate on the final budget to be presented by the government in mid-July 2024; and let us not forget that this will be a coalition budget and not a typical majority budget like in the last 10 years.


Central banks always keep price stability as their preamble and growth only comes as a secondary consideration in rate decisions. However, the RBI is in a unique position. It presides over an economy that has been the fastest growing large economy for 3 years in a row. Hence, the RBI is as sensitive to growth, as it is to inflation when taking rate decisions. For instance, the decision to halt rate cuts in February 2023 was taken keeping in mind the pressure of higher rates. However, the time may have finally come, when the RBI needs to move on cutting rates. While the overall GDP growth has been robust in the range of 7-8% in the last 3 years, a boost to manufacturing IIP needs more than just incentive schemes. They need access to low cost funds and that can only be provided if the RBI cuts rates.

At a macro level, there are 2 compelling factors justifying pre-emptive rate cut by the RBI. Firstly, the real rates (interest rates net of inflation) around 2.25%, against a median figure of between 1% and 1.5%. Secondly, at 6.5%, the repo rates are 135 bps above the pre-COVID rate of 5.15%. With the elections over and the new government taking office, the action now shifts to what the RBI can do on its part. While the government is a coalition, it is a stable coalition and rate cuts could be the much needed boost to the Indian companies looking for reduction in funding costs. That, by itself, can trigger pre-emptive rate cuts by the RBI; possibly even as early as the August 2024 policy.

Related Tags

  • GDP
  • IIP
  • IndexofIndustrialProduction
  • inflation
sidebar mobile


Read More

Invest Right News

BSE: Firing on all cylinders
10 Apr 2024|12:07 PM
Read More
Knowledge Centerplus

Logo IIFL Customer Care Number
1860-267-3000 / 7039-050-000

Logo IIFL Securities Support WhatsApp Number
+91 9892691696

Download The App Now

Knowledge Centerplus

Follow us on


2024, IIFL Securities Ltd. All Rights Reserved

  • Prevent Unauthorized Transactions in your demat / trading account Update your Mobile Number/ email Id with your stock broker / Depository Participant. Receive information of your transactions directly from Exchanges on your mobile / email at the end of day and alerts on your registered mobile for all debits and other important transactions in your demat account directly from NSDL/ CDSL on the same day." - Issued in the interest of investors.
  • KYC is one time exercise while dealing in securities markets - once KYC is done through a SEBI registered intermediary (broker, DP, Mutual Fund etc.), you need not undergo the same process again when you approach another intermediary.
  • No need to issue cheques by investors while subscribing to IPO. Just write the bank account number and sign in the application form to authorise your bank to make payment in case of allotment. No worries for refund as the money remains in investor's account."

www.indiainfoline.com is part of the IIFL Group, a leading financial services player and a diversified NBFC. The site provides comprehensive and real time information on Indian corporates, sectors, financial markets and economy. On the site we feature industry and political leaders, entrepreneurs, and trend setters. The research, personal finance and market tutorial sections are widely followed by students, academia, corporates and investors among others.

  • 9 out of 10 individual traders in equity Futures and Options Segment, incurred net losses.
  • On an average, loss makers registered net trading loss close to Rs. 50,000.
  • Over and above the net trading losses incurred, loss makers expended an additional 28% of net trading losses as transaction costs.
  • Those making net trading profits, incurred between 15% to 50% of such profits as transaction cost.
Copyright © IIFL Securities Ltd. All rights Reserved.

Stock Broker SEBI Regn. No: INZ000164132, PMS SEBI Regn. No: INP000002213,IA SEBI Regn. No: INA000000623, SEBI RA Regn. No: INH000000248

We are ISO 27001:2013 Certified.

This Certificate Demonstrates That IIFL As An Organization Has Defined And Put In Place Best-Practice Information Security Processes.