The proposals that limited broadcasters’ bundling flexibility in the earlier NTO 2.0, have been reversed or diluted, while TRAI has ensured that consumer outgo does not jump significantly. TRAI’s deadline for implementation of amended NTO 2.0 is Feb 1st, 2023. Analysts at IIFL Capital Services do not see delay from further litigations; TV subscription revenue growth for broadcasters and DPOs should resume after remaining flattish for three years, due to NTO 2.0 limbo. The industry may tread cautiously on price hikes as it balances reach (ad revenue) and pricing (subscription) amid rural weakness.
TRAI’s balancing act
Key amendments to NTO 2.0 are:
Analysts at IIFL Capital Services do not foresee a significant hit, though DPOs may have to adjust their systems to the new rules.
No further incremental hit to DPOs
With DPOs having implemented a part of the earlier NTO 2.0 (after an unfavorable verdict in the Kerala High Court), they have already taken hit from network capacity fee (NCF) caps. Amended NTO 2.0 does not address this; however, there would be no incremental hit. On the other hand, DPOs would also benefit from pack price increases and higher incentives from broadcasters (which the amended NTO 2.0 also extends to bouquets versus just ala-carte earlier).
Subscription revenue growth may improve modestly in FY24
Since NTO 2.0 implementation was stuck in courts for most of the past three years, the industry could not take price increases and consequently, TV subscription revenue remained flat. Modest subscription revenue growth, coupled with recovery in ad revenue from the low base in FY23, should ensure improved revenue growth for broadcasters and better profitability in FY24.
Key amendments to NTO 2.0 and their implications
Amended NTO 2.0 | Comment |
Customer facing rules | |
If MRP> Rs19, channel cannot be included in bouquet | This is the same as NTO 1.0 and a dilution of Old NTO 2.0 that lowered the MRP threshold to Rs12. Old NTO 2.0 would have forced exclusion of key channels from bouquets, resulting in a shift from bouquet to alaâ€carte. This may have resulted in ad/subscription revenue hit based on the pull of the key channels. |
Max NCF of Rs130 for first 200 SD channels | This is the same as old NTO 2.0. Most DPOs have already implemented this. So, no incremental negative impact. |
Total NCF capped at Rs160 | This is the same as old NTO 2.0. Most DPOs have already implemented this. So, no incremental negative impact. |
NCF of second (and more) TVs in a HH capped at 40% of NCF of the first TV | |
Rules governing broadcaster and DPO transactions | |
Max discount of 45% while pricing bouquet versus sum of alaâ€carte prices | This is a dilution from old NTO 2.0 (max discount of 33%) but still worse than NTO 1.0 (where there was no mandatory cap, but a discount of 50â€60% was observed). However, top broadcasters may be able to keep the hit to a minimum. |
Broadcaster can offer up to 15% incentives on pay channel MRP to DPO for alaâ€carte and bouquets (versus just alaâ€carte earlier) | Extension to bouquets is based on a complex formula, which can result in operational challenges. Broadcaster payouts to DPOs unlikely to change materially, since there is flexibility. |
Source: TRAI, IIFL Research
Related Tags
Invest wise with Expert advice
IIFL Customer Care Number
(Gold/NCD/NBFC/Insurance/NPS)
1860-267-3000 / 7039-050-000
IIFL Capital Services Support WhatsApp Number
+91 9892691696
IIFL Capital Services Limited - Stock Broker SEBI Regn. No: INZ000164132, PMS SEBI Regn. No: INP000002213,IA SEBI Regn. No: INA000000623, SEBI RA Regn. No: INH000000248
ARN NO : 47791 (AMFI Registered Mutual Fund Distributor)
This Certificate Demonstrates That IIFL As An Organization Has Defined And Put In Place Best-Practice Information Security Processes.