AUM ACCRETION – OCTOBER 2024 MACRO STORY
Changes in AUM are triggered by flows and market value change. It is interesting to understand how much of the AUM change was driven by net flows and how much by market shifts (rise and fall in equities and bonds). Let us look at the macro story first. Between September 2024 and October 2024; the AUM of open-ended funds went up from ₹66.82 Trillion to ₹66.99 Trillion. That is an actual AUM accretion of ₹16,767 Crore on MOM basis. However, in October 2024, open-ended funds saw net inflows of ₹2,39,907 Crore. This effectively means that the impact of price depletion on AUM in October 2024 was to the tune of ₹(2,23,140) Crore. Why did market movements neutralized almost the entire net inflows in mutual fund in October 2024? It was a month in which the Nifty cracked over 8% resulting in sharp value depletion across active equity funds, passive equity funds, and hybrid funds. In addition, bond yields also went up; which hit longer duration active and passive debt funds too. The depletion of ₹(2.23) trillion was an outcome of this dual impact.
AUM ACCRETION OF ACTIVE DEBT FUNDS – OCTOBER 2024
Active debt funds in India include a whole range of debt durations. At the long end you have 10-Year G-Sec funds and gilt funds and at the short end you have liquid funds and overnight funds. In this list, we only cover active debt funds, since passive debt funds are clubbed under the passive category. Here is the story of AUM accretion of debt funds in Oct-24.
Active Debt Market Funds |
Net Inflow in the Fund | AUM Closing Value | AUM Accretion | Price Accretion | Price Move Dominance |
Floater Fund | 152.08 | 52,678.42 | 537.04 | 384.97 | 71.68% |
Short Duration Fund | 1,362.43 | 1,15,047.36 | 1,979.18 | 616.75 | 31.16% |
Banking and PSU Fund | 936.54 | 78,067.78 | 1,341.35 | 404.81 | 30.18% |
Corporate Bond Fund | 4,644.40 | 1,68,100.41 | 5,530.14 | 885.74 | 16.02% |
Medium to Long Duration Fund | 99.16 | 11,667.30 | 112.59 | 13.43 | 11.93% |
Low Duration Fund | 5,600.29 | 1,12,924.80 | 6,352.80 | 752.51 | 11.85% |
Ultra Short Duration Fund | 7,053.79 | 1,07,899.35 | 7,719.88 | 666.09 | 8.63% |
Dynamic Bond Fund | 514.54 | 35,073.03 | 560.92 | 46.38 | 8.27% |
Money Market Fund | 25,303.45 | 2,50,832.46 | 26,842.42 | 1,538.96 | 5.73% |
Liquid Fund | 83,863.34 | 5,27,290.58 | 86,958.04 | 3,094.70 | 3.56% |
Overnight Fund | 25,783.59 | 93,589.84 | 26,315.25 | 531.66 | 2.02% |
Long Duration Fund | 1,117.47 | 19,341.65 | 1,065.33 | -52.14 | -4.89% |
Gilt Fund 10-Y Constant Duration | 102.91 | 4,770.66 | 97.66 | -5.24 | -5.37% |
Gilt Fund | 1,375.57 | 39,714.02 | 1,304.62 | -70.95 | -5.44% |
Credit Risk Fund | -357.81 | 21,112.37 | -192.50 | 165.31 | -85.88% |
Medium Duration Fund | -149.46 | 25,585.70 | -16.31 | 133.15 | -816.16% |
Grand Total | 1,57,402.30 | 16,63,695.74 | 1,66,508.42 | 9,106.12 | 5.47% |
Data source: AMFI (absolute figures are ₹ in Crore)
Here is what we read from the AUM shift of active debt funds in October 2024.
Let us now look at active equity funds.
AUM ACCRETION OF ACTIVE EQUITY FUNDS – OCTOBER 2024
Active equity funds in India cover a range from sectoral and thematic funds to active funds based on market capitalization. Here is how the AUM accretion in active equity funds got split between net flows and price movements.
Active Equity Market Funds |
Net Inflow in the Fund | AUM Closing Value | AUM Accretion | Price Accretion | Price Move Dominance |
Sectoral/Thematic Funds | 12,278.78 | 4,52,461.53 | -14,726.39 | -27,005.18 | 183.38% |
Multi Cap Fund | 3,596.91 | 1,74,299.91 | -5,880.76 | -9,477.67 | 161.16% |
Small Cap Fund | 3,771.97 | 3,21,984.81 | -6,852.69 | -10,624.66 | 155.04% |
Large & Mid Cap Fund | 4,857.14 | 2,61,979.74 | -10,829.33 | -15,686.47 | 144.85% |
Dividend Yield Fund | 532.82 | 31,921.80 | -1,517.57 | -2,050.38 | 135.11% |
Value Fund/Contra Fund | 2,456.63 | 1,87,735.88 | -7,877.70 | -10,334.33 | 131.18% |
Mid Cap Fund | 4,682.90 | 3,81,708.83 | -15,300.89 | -19,983.79 | 130.61% |
Flexi Cap Fund | 5,180.69 | 4,27,421.65 | -16,953.78 | -22,134.47 | 130.56% |
Large Cap Fund | 3,452.34 | 3,59,461.12 | -19,548.96 | -23,001.30 | 117.66% |
Focused Fund | 693.16 | 1,46,863.47 | -7,327.51 | -8,020.67 | 109.46% |
ELSS | 383.36 | 2,43,426.44 | -14,397.85 | -14,781.21 | 102.66% |
Grand Total | 41,886.69 | 29,89,265.18 | -1,21,213.44 | -1,63,100.13 | 134.56% |
Data source: AMFI (absolute figures are ₹ in Crore)
No prizes for guessing, but in the case of active equity funds, it was clearly the price effect that more than neutralized the net flows into equity funds. Here are key takeaways.
Let us now shift our focus to hybrid funds.
AUM ACCRETION IN HYBRID FUNDS – OCTOBER 2024
The table below offers a quick impact of price depletion on the overall AUM movement in October 2024. With most hybrid funds trying to mirror equity funds for tax purposes, the impact of price has been severe in the case of hybrid funds too.
Hybrid and Retirement Funds |
Net Inflow in the Fund | AUM Closing Value | AUM Accretion | Price Accretion | Price Move Dominance |
Dynamic Asset Allocation/BAF | 2,456.18 | 2,83,952.73 | -5,149.53 | -7,605.71 | 147.70% |
Retirement Fund | 207.75 | 29,987.70 | -1,059.45 | -1,267.20 | 119.61% |
Children’s Fund | 118.45 | 22,220.81 | -670.76 | -789.21 | 117.66% |
Aggressive Hybrid Fund | 1,370.60 | 2,21,370.43 | -7,926.17 | -9,296.77 | 117.29% |
Arbitrage Fund | 7,181.70 | 1,98,981.23 | 9,118.09 | 1,936.38 | 21.24% |
Equity Savings Fund | 1,747.61 | 40,603.44 | 1,057.05 | -690.56 | -65.33% |
Conservative Hybrid Fund | 310.51 | 28,644.00 | 69.21 | -241.30 | -348.67% |
Multi Asset Allocation Fund | 3,796.69 | 99,116.37 | 600.61 | -3,196.08 | -532.14% |
Grand Total | 17,189.49 | 9,24,876.72 | -3,960.97 | -21,150.47 | 533.97% |
Data source: AMFI (absolute figures are ₹ in Crore)
Like in the case of active funds, even in case of hybrid funds, it is the price effect that has dominated. In fact, in October 2024, the price depletion more than neutralized the net flows into hybrid funds. Here are key takeaways.
Let us now shift our focus to passive funds.
AUM ACCRETION IN PASSIVE FUNDS – OCTOBER 2024
Finally, let us look at how the AUM shift for passive funds got split between net flows and price movements.
Index and Passive Funds |
Net Inflow in the Fund | AUM Closing Value | AUM Accretion | Price Accretion | Price Move Dominance |
Index Funds | 7,931.01 | 2,67,824.06 | -1,867.16 | -9,798.17 | 524.76% |
Fund of funds investing overseas | 93.91 | 25,817.39 | -49.02 | -142.93 | 291.57% |
Other ETFs | 13,441.82 | 7,82,900.10 | -27,372.68 | -40,814.50 | 149.11% |
GOLD ETF | 1,961.57 | 44,545.22 | 4,721.72 | 2,760.16 | 58.46% |
Grand Total | 23,428.31 | 11,21,086.78 | -24,567.14 | -47,995.45 | 195.36% |
Data source: AMFI (absolute figures are ₹ in Crore)
Like in the case of active funds, even in case of passive funds, it is the price effect that has dominated. In fact, in October 2024, the price depletion not only neutralized net flows into hybrid funds; but was nearly twice the net flows. Here are key takeaways.
The correction in stocks and the spike in bond yields has led to a sharply negative price effect across fund classes in October 2024.
Related Tags
IIFL Customer Care Number
(Gold/NCD/NBFC/Insurance/NPS)
1860-267-3000 / 7039-050-000
IIFL Capital Services Support WhatsApp Number
+91 9892691696
IIFL Securities Limited - Stock Broker SEBI Regn. No: INZ000164132, PMS SEBI Regn. No: INP000002213,IA SEBI Regn. No: INA000000623, SEBI RA Regn. No: INH000000248
This Certificate Demonstrates That IIFL As An Organization Has Defined And Put In Place Best-Practice Information Security Processes.
Invest wise with Expert advice