Change of rules
One of the main reasons of an ascending expense ratio is the Securities and Exchange Board's new regulations that took effect from August 2012. As per these rules, Sebi granted MFs the right to charge 30 bps more for tapping money from cities other than 15 major cities. While the move is aimed to increase investor participation from smaller cities, but this amounts to burden for all investors. Also, the service tax load has now been shifted on the investors, unlike the earlier times, when the mutual fund house used to bear the expense. This move alone has raised the expenses by 0.65% to 0.90% on the investors. Also, the sub-limit on expenses has been lifted, which means that earlier the fund houses restricted the expenses to 1.25, but now they have the freedom to charge entire 2 or2.5% as a fund management fee.
Though nothing specific could be done to minimize the impact on returns, but by investing in schemes with a larger corpus like that of Rs. 1,000 crore or more could relieve investors as expense load tends to diminish as fund size increases. Index funds too have lower expense ratio, but it involves little fund management skills and therefore should be opted only if your goal is to track index.