Table of Content
India has stringent rules governing foreign exchange to control money flow and protect its economy. The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and the Foreign Exchange Management Act are the two main laws that control foreign exchange transactions in India. These regulations guarantee the preservation of the nation’s foreign exchange reserves and the oversight of all cross-border transactions. So, let’s explore FEMA and FERA difference in detail.
In order to control foreign exchange operations and protect the nation’s foreign exchange reserves, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) was passed into law in India in 1973. The main goal of FERA, which was enacted during a period of low foreign exchange reserves in India, was to stop the improper use of foreign currency and illicit activities utilizing it. FERA enforced strict regulations on a variety of forex-related transactions, such as:
The act also gave the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) the authority to keep an eye on these activities, regulate them, and, in the event that non-compliance occurs, confiscate assets in addition to harsh penalties and jail. For numerous decades, FERA significantly influenced India’s foreign exchange environment, earning it a reputation for its stringent enforcement methods. Nonetheless, the act faced criticism due to its intricate processes, severe penalties, and perceived impediment to the liberalization of the economy
FEMA’s full form is Foreign Exchange Management Act, also known as FEMA. In order to improve India’s foreign exchange management and structure, it superseded FERA in 1999. FEMA has around 49 sections, and their main aim is to: –
Aspect | FERA | FEMA |
Full Form | Foreign Exchange Regulation Act | Foreign Exchange Management Act |
Enactment Year | Enacted in 1973 | Enacted in 1999 |
Objective | Control and regulate foreign exchange | Manage and facilitate foreign exchange |
Regulatory Authority | Central Government | Reserve Bank of India (RBI) |
Focus | Regulation | Management |
Penalties | Strict penalties and criminal charges for violations | Emphasis on compliance and civil penalties |
Liberalization | Restrictive in nature, aimed at protecting the Indian economy | A more liberal approach, encouraging foreign investment and trade |
Provisions | Stringent controls on foreign exchange transactions, licenses required for various activities | Simplified procedures, fewer restrictions, emphasis on reporting and compliance |
Enforcement | Rigid enforcement, emphasis on punishment for violations | More flexible enforcement, focus on education, and compliance |
Two important laws that control foreign exchange transactions in India are the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and Foreign Exchange Management Act. Let’s talk about their importance in detail: –
Before FEMA, FERA was enacted into law in 1973 to regulate foreign exchange transactions in India. Its intention was to maintain and manage the country’s foreign exchange reserves, which are vital for the health of the economy. Furthermore, under FERA, rigorous regulations were established for all foreign exchange transactions, including investment and remittances.
When FEMA replaced FERA in 1999, the foreign currency management policy of India underwent a radical change. To simplify cross-border trade and investment, FEMA liberalised several foreign exchange transaction areas and aligned them with international economic trends.
While it was in operation, FERA played a crucial role in safeguarding India’s reserves of foreign exchange. FERA attempted to maintain economic stability and prevent an unjustified erosion of reserves by managing the movement of foreign exchange. Its stringent laws, however, at times made it more complicated to conduct business as well as attract foreign investment.
The establishment of FEMA revolutionised the foreign currency management landscape of India. Streamlining processes and deregulating legislation enhanced the environment for foreign investment and trade. Additionally, FEMA facilitated opportunities for foreign investors to explore India, thus driving economic growth and development.
They were active during different eras of the regulation of foreign currency. But both FERA and FEMA are important due to the manner in which India’s regulatory framework evolved. While FEMA adapted to changing global forces with economic growth and liberalisation, FERA laid down the architecture for dealing with foreign exchange in a controlled scenario.
Two significant acts that have governed foreign exchange transactions in India are FEMA and FERA. FEMA aims to liberalise and simplify the process, while FERA was more interested in governing and controlling such types of transactions. These actions have greatly helped shape how India’s economy has evolved and how it has become integrated into the global market. Thus, to avoid any legal action, it is essential that businesses and individuals handling foreign exchange understand these rules and follow the conditions.
The main difference lies in their objectives, with FERA focusing on control and regulation of foreign exchange transactions, while FEMA focuses on management and facilitation.
Yes, residents of India can invest in foreign securities subject to certain conditions and limits prescribed by RBI.
No, FEMA follows the regular judicial system in India.
Under FERA, violations could attract imprisonment for up to seven years and hefty fines.
IIFL Customer Care Number
(Gold/NCD/NBFC/Insurance/NPS)
1860-267-3000 / 7039-050-000
IIFL Capital Services Support WhatsApp Number
+91 9892691696
IIFL Capital Services Limited - Stock Broker SEBI Regn. No: INZ000164132, PMS SEBI Regn. No: INP000002213,IA SEBI Regn. No: INA000000623, SEBI RA Regn. No: INH000000248, DP SEBI Reg. No. IN-DP-185-2016, BSE Enlistment Number (RA): 5016
ARN NO : 47791 (AMFI Registered Mutual Fund Distributor)
This Certificate Demonstrates That IIFL As An Organization Has Defined And Put In Place Best-Practice Information Security Processes.